SiZU

SiZU — CS2 Stats

FR76561198785487530[U:1:825221802]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

719Tracked matches62%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.2 StrongEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating21,679Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15984 of 55459 tracked
FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSiZUFACEITLevel 7STANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER21,679 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning66
Utility35

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55369Last 10055%Win rateTWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.7
Aggression10.0
Utility3.5
Positioning6.6
Opening Duels6.0
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 65% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 65% on CT to 43% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning6.6
Utility3.5
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels6.0
Win Impact9.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time552ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 552ms
Headshot accuracy27.6%+4.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.5% → last ⅓ avg 27.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — inferno 9–3
130Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
103In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13dust2Weakest map · 41% over 17
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA27161159%0.01
mirageB189950%0.02
dust2C1771041%0.03
nukeB147750%0.02
ancientS139469%0.02
anubisA106460%0.02
vertigo110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (41% over 17). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

198Matches
49%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
85.2ADR
57%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient4865%1.3819.7
Mirage3951%1.2918.4
Anubis3951%1.3018.3
Dust23647%1.1918.2
Nuke1839%1.2317.8
Inferno1010%0.9815.9
Cache617%0.8813.7
Overpass10%0.7613.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.3%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.2%Spray accuracy
83.6%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
553msReaction time
43.3%T opening success
64.6%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
7.26HE damage / grenade
6.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3791 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

41% win rate across 17 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage15–150.0427%30 Aug
ancient13–80.0535%30 Aug
ancient13–90.0225%29 Aug
nuke3–9-0.1729%29 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0120%27 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0216%27 Aug
anubis10–130.0441%26 Aug
nuke8–130.0627%23 Aug
dust212–80.1217%23 Aug
vertigo13–40.0127%23 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0632%21 Aug
inferno9–60.0939%21 Aug
nuke8–130.0136%20 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0617%16 Aug
mirage8–130.0929%15 Aug
mirage13–100.0027%15 Aug
dust211–130.0215%9 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0222%9 Aug
mirage13–60.1021%8 Aug
mirage13–50.0950%30 Jul
anubis1–13-0.0413%30 Jul
ancient0–13-0.0432%30 Jul
dust210–130.0031%30 Jul
inferno13–100.0425%29 Jul
anubis13–80.0822%26 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0024%19 Jul
mirage13–90.0125%19 Jul
anubis16–140.0332%18 Jul
dust213–110.0936%18 Jul
mirage6–130.0126%17 Jul
inferno13–100.0636%17 Jul
ancient13–80.0620%17 Jul
anubis13–40.1539%17 Jul
dust213–100.0832%17 Jul
mirage13–70.0826%17 Jul
nuke13–30.2036%17 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0122%13 Jul
dust216–140.0623%13 Jul
mirage6–130.0620%13 Jul
nuke13–70.0233%13 Jul
dust215–150.0130%12 Jul
dust210–130.0232%12 Jul
dust20–13-0.0733%12 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0320%11 Jul
dust24–13-0.0318%11 Jul
anubis16–140.0027%11 Jul
ancient13–60.0430%7 Jul
inferno5–9-0.1326%5 Jul
inferno9–20.1435%5 Jul
inferno9–7-0.0024%5 Jul
inferno9–70.0924%5 Jul
inferno9–40.1122%5 Jul
inferno8–80.0839%5 Jul
inferno9–60.0335%5 Jul
inferno9–60.1418%5 Jul
inferno9–30.2046%5 Jul
inferno9–40.0829%5 Jul
ancient5–130.0024%28 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0731%28 Jun
dust213–90.0517%28 Jun
nuke13–80.1215%28 Jun
mirage4–13-0.0632%28 Jun
dust29–130.0120%27 Jun
anubis15–150.0231%27 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0019%27 Jun
ancient13–80.0123%27 Jun
mirage7–130.0727%25 Jun
inferno13–9-0.0117%21 Jun
dust216–130.0925%21 Jun
ancient13–40.1018%21 Jun
mirage13–3-0.0221%21 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0526%21 Jun
inferno9–60.0032%15 Jun
inferno1–9-0.350%15 Jun
inferno8–80.0526%15 Jun
inferno9–60.0212%14 Jun
inferno0–9-0.240%14 Jun
nuke9–30.0130%14 Jun
nuke7–9-0.0239%14 Jun
inferno9–50.0933%14 Jun
ancient13–70.0320%14 Jun
mirage13–100.0123%14 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0215%14 Jun
dust215–150.0130%14 Jun
nuke13–110.1034%14 Jun
ancient3–13-0.0221%14 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0429%12 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0027%12 Jun
ancient13–16-0.067%11 Jun
dust210–13-0.0022%10 Jun
dust212–12-0.0224%10 Jun
ancient13–00.0731%10 Jun
inferno2–9-0.2522%10 Jun
inferno8–80.0425%10 Jun
nuke1–9-0.2130%10 Jun
inferno8–80.0339%10 Jun
nuke9–60.1517%10 Jun
inferno9–10.0733%10 Jun
dust213–110.1317%9 Jun
nuke13–20.1331%9 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →