wOndеrful — CS2 Stats

76561198779916668[U:1:819650940]

805Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 9 · 953 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGwOndеrfulFACEITLevel 9 · 953 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning57
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52399Last 10052%Win rateLLWWWWTWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.9
Aggression9.1
Utility2.2
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 35% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning5.7
Utility2.2
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.05+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.05
Reaction time585ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%−3.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — mirage 13–7
130Biggest win — inferno
7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 75% over 12infernoWeakest map · 43% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B32171553%0.05
cacheB22101245%0.02
infernoC146843%0.04
mirageS129375%0.02
nukeC94544%0.09
anubisA74357%0.03
ancient42250%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

132Matches
63%Win rate
1.42Avg K/D
90.1ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
33%1v2 clutch win
15Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4665%1.4617.3
Dust22966%1.2717.2
Ancient2255%1.3716.5
Nuke1275%1.7323.5
Anubis956%1.2618.1
Inferno757%1.1917.9
Cache560%1.7320.0
Overpass250%2.1521.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
35.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.1%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
575msReaction time
34.6%T opening success
57.3%CT opening success
0.39Enemies flashed / flash
0.3%Flash assists
3.11HE damage / grenade
3.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3915 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.5896% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–130.0318%3 Aug
cache7–13-0.0021%1 Aug
dust213–4-0.0312%1 Aug
mirage13–100.0221%1 Aug
anubis13–50.0223%1 Aug
dust213–60.0814%31 Jul
dust212–120.1831%25 Jul
nuke13–90.0724%25 Jul
nuke10–130.0716%25 Jul
dust213–70.0521%25 Jul
nuke13–20.1030%25 Jul
inferno11–130.0712%25 Jul
inferno8–130.0620%24 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0413%24 Jul
dust213–110.1119%20 Jul
cache13–5-0.0017%20 Jul
dust213–80.0528%19 Jul
dust211–130.1518%19 Jul
dust213–70.0823%19 Jul
nuke7–80.1613%19 Jul
dust25–130.0217%18 Jul
inferno11–130.1027%18 Jul
dust26–130.0327%18 Jul
inferno13–100.0631%18 Jul
dust27–130.1315%17 Jul
mirage12–12-0.0118%17 Jul
mirage13–90.0516%17 Jul
inferno6–130.0119%17 Jul
dust28–130.0320%12 Jul
dust28–13-0.0328%12 Jul
dust212–120.0125%12 Jul
dust213–20.0520%12 Jul
inferno13–00.0526%12 Jul
dust24–130.0622%12 Jul
cache13–11-0.0410%12 Jul
dust213–30.0423%12 Jul
cache13–20.0937%11 Jul
dust213–90.0125%11 Jul
ancient12–120.0523%11 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0225%11 Jul
cache10–130.0331%11 Jul
inferno13–110.0612%11 Jul
anubis13–100.0119%11 Jul
cache6–130.0714%9 Jul
mirage13–8-0.0718%9 Jul
mirage11–130.0020%9 Jul
cache3–130.1118%9 Jul
anubis12–120.1030%9 Jul
nuke13–70.1025%9 Jul
inferno13–50.0232%9 Jul
ancient13–70.0430%9 Jul
dust213–4-0.0225%9 Jul
dust213–50.0525%8 Jul
dust213–100.0925%8 Jul
dust213–90.0853%8 Jul
anubis8–130.0119%8 Jul
cache3–130.0216%8 Jul
anubis13–60.0225%8 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0020%8 Jul
mirage13–90.0317%8 Jul
cache10–13-0.0718%8 Jul
dust22–13-0.0136%8 Jul
cache6–13-0.094%8 Jul
inferno12–120.0823%8 Jul
ancient13–100.0110%8 Jul
cache6–10-0.0218%8 Jul
inferno5–130.0734%7 Jul
cache3–13-0.0532%7 Jul
cache13–4-0.0423%7 Jul
anubis13–30.0142%7 Jul
cache13–110.1017%7 Jul
cache3–13-0.0125%7 Jul
cache2–00.03100%7 Jul
ancient9–130.0427%7 Jul
cache13–90.0432%6 Jul
cache13–8-0.0120%6 Jul
mirage13–30.0414%6 Jul
cache10–130.0818%6 Jul
dust213–40.1627%5 Jul
nuke2–130.0830%5 Jul
dust213–50.0427%5 Jul
dust213–50.1023%5 Jul
mirage13–70.2332%4 Jul
nuke13–110.1223%4 Jul
mirage13–20.0433%4 Jul
dust26–13-0.0621%4 Jul
dust213–6-0.0210%4 Jul
dust23–10-0.0314%4 Jul
cache13–50.0717%3 Jul
dust212–120.0019%3 Jul
inferno13–80.0118%3 Jul
inferno2–13-0.0716%3 Jul
cache13–80.1013%3 Jul
dust211–130.0014%3 Jul
nuke6–130.0419%3 Jul
anubis9–130.0232%3 Jul
inferno13–30.0633%3 Jul
inferno12–120.0413%2 Jul
nuke12–120.0210%2 Jul
dust211–130.0715%2 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →