sparky✦

sparky✦ — CS2 Stats

76561198733508334[U:1:773242606]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

804Tracked matches54%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating11,255Blue band · top ~48.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#39216 of 56281 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsparky✦FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER11,255 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning51
Utility44

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateWWTWLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression6.6
Utility4.4
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch1.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 579ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.1
Utility4.4
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time590ms−81ms
first ⅓ avg 671ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy10.4%−2.5%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 10.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–3
131Biggest win — nuke
4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 64% over 11anubisWeakest map · 40% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB31141745%0.00
dust2C23101343%0.02
cacheA138562%0.01
infernoA117464%0.02
anubisC104640%0.01
ancientA74357%-0.04
nuke42250%-0.00
vertigo1010%-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

34Matches
62%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
64.2ADR
27%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1362%0.7911.9
Anubis650%0.8213.2
Dust2560%0.8113.6
Ancient3100%0.9210.3
Nuke3100%1.0213.7
Overpass250%0.728.5
Inferno10%0.447.0
Cache10%0.578.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

10.5%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.7%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
579msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
48.8%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
10.15HE damage / grenade
6.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 10.5123% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.383 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.1142% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.039%27 Aug
mirage10–30.1319%27 Aug
dust212–120.1316%27 Aug
cache13–100.0712%26 Aug
mirage5–13-0.073%26 Aug
anubis13–11-0.0418%26 Aug
anubis11–130.0312%25 Aug
mirage10–130.0315%25 Aug
vertigo3–13-0.1015%24 Aug
inferno13–60.0411%24 Aug
mirage12–120.0213%24 Aug
inferno10–13-0.059%23 Aug
cache4–13-0.0225%23 Aug
mirage3–13-0.117%23 Aug
anubis9–13-0.010%23 Aug
cache13–110.096%23 Aug
mirage13–70.027%23 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0112%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.073%23 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0811%23 Aug
ancient6–13-0.043%23 Aug
anubis11–130.056%23 Aug
inferno8–13-0.027%23 Aug
dust213–40.0113%23 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0413%23 Aug
cache13–30.0110%23 Aug
dust210–13-0.0213%22 Aug
nuke13–10.0413%22 Aug
inferno13–1-0.000%20 Aug
dust213–100.0614%20 Aug
dust212–12-0.098%20 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0110%19 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0411%19 Aug
cache11–13-0.096%19 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0510%19 Aug
mirage13–30.1414%19 Aug
dust24–13-0.0316%18 Aug
cache9–130.0118%18 Aug
mirage13–70.049%18 Aug
anubis4–130.0413%18 Aug
inferno13–3-0.008%18 Aug
mirage1–13-0.066%18 Aug
dust213–110.0321%18 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0313%18 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0118%18 Aug
mirage16–130.038%18 Aug
mirage11–130.023%18 Aug
dust22–13-0.0722%17 Aug
mirage13–20.0515%16 Aug
cache10–13-0.0410%16 Aug
ancient5–13-0.063%16 Aug
inferno13–60.0713%8 Aug
anubis13–30.047%8 Aug
cache13–20.0519%8 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0220%8 Aug
mirage5–130.0011%8 Aug
mirage13–100.007%8 Aug
mirage13–100.0518%7 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0123%7 Aug
dust213–80.065%7 Aug
anubis13–50.0514%7 Aug
dust213–30.1416%7 Aug
mirage10–130.0310%6 Aug
dust25–13-0.008%6 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0013%6 Aug
dust211–130.0310%5 Aug
dust213–50.0729%5 Aug
ancient12–10.0110%5 Aug
dust213–30.0818%5 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0412%5 Aug
anubis9–130.0314%5 Aug
dust26–130.0212%4 Aug
nuke13–20.0711%4 Aug
mirage13–10-0.066%4 Aug
inferno10–130.1111%4 Aug
dust24–130.0124%4 Aug
dust24–13-0.0516%3 Aug
dust24–13-0.0717%3 Aug
dust27–13-0.0324%3 Aug
dust213–80.0413%2 Aug
inferno13–60.0526%2 Aug
cache13–40.0424%2 Aug
mirage4–130.0011%2 Aug
inferno13–80.009%2 Aug
mirage13–70.0012%2 Aug
dust213–5-0.026%2 Aug
dust211–130.108%2 Aug
cache13–5-0.0425%1 Aug
mirage1–13-0.038%1 Aug
mirage13–50.0413%1 Aug
cache13–8-0.0216%1 Aug
mirage13–40.019%1 Aug
mirage6–13-0.047%31 Jul
inferno4–13-0.057%31 Jul
cache3–130.084%31 Jul
cache13–4-0.053%31 Jul
dust213–80.0627%31 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0410%30 Jul
mirage11–13-0.034%29 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0811%29 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →