󠀡󠀡󠀡

󠀡󠀡󠀡 — CS2 Stats

76561198725371793[U:1:765106065]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

550Tracked matches74%Win rate2026Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongEntry Fragger
Premier CS Rating19,504Purple band · top ~10.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11302 of 24927 tracked
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG󠀡󠀡󠀡PREMIER19,504 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim86
Positioning65
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT59338Last 10059%Win rateLWTWWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry FraggerHigh opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.6
Aggression10.0
Utility3.6
Positioning6.5
Opening Duels6.7
Clutch4.2

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 86 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 66% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 66% on CT to 47% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 584ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.6
Positioning6.5
Utility3.6
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels6.7
Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time603ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 603ms
Headshot accuracy22.2%+3.2%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — poseidon 9–5
130Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
84In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 20anubisWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
poseidonC33141942%-0.01
nukeS2016480%0.03
mirageA169756%0.03
vertigoB63350%0.07
anubisC52340%0.00
ancient42250%0.03
cache43175%0.04
dust2440100%-0.00
office43175%-0.01
italy220100%0.09
eldorado1010%0.09
inferno110100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

167Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
83.2ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage4643%1.0115.9
Dust24439%0.9514.1
Ancient2162%1.1317.3
Anubis2152%1.0217.1
Inferno1267%1.2114.3
Nuke1080%1.1018.3
Cache944%1.0014.9
Overpass250%0.7413.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.5%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.6%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
8.1°Preaim
584msReaction time
47.0%T opening success
66.3%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
8.9%Flash assists
8.82HE damage / grenade
4.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient10–130.0618%28 Aug
nuke13–50.0424%26 Aug
cache15–150.0022%26 Aug
mirage13–110.0022%26 Aug
cache13–20.0933%26 Aug
cache13–60.0217%26 Aug
ancient13–100.0135%26 Aug
mirage11–00.1416%25 Aug
dust213–40.0328%25 Aug
nuke16–120.0219%24 Aug
mirage15–150.0615%24 Aug
vertigo12–120.0424%24 Aug
mirage8–130.0614%24 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0326%24 Aug
anubis6–130.0618%23 Aug
mirage13–90.0819%23 Aug
nuke13–80.0523%23 Aug
nuke13–80.0334%22 Aug
mirage13–50.0415%22 Aug
mirage5–70.1132%21 Aug
mirage13–40.0919%21 Aug
dust213–8-0.0118%21 Aug
nuke13–40.0019%20 Aug
nuke13–11-0.0715%20 Aug
nuke13–30.0625%20 Aug
nuke13–100.0117%19 Aug
anubis13–100.0020%19 Aug
nuke7–130.0719%19 Aug
nuke13–90.0317%19 Aug
nuke5–130.0434%19 Aug
nuke5–4-0.0424%18 Aug
nuke13–40.0720%17 Aug
nuke11–30.0432%17 Aug
vertigo9–130.0424%16 Aug
nuke13–110.0821%16 Aug
poseidon0–9-0.1550%16 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0616%13 Aug
italy13–100.0415%13 Aug
cache13–90.0619%10 Aug
vertigo13–40.0817%10 Aug
italy13–60.1515%10 Aug
poseidon6–9-0.1118%10 Aug
nuke13–30.0920%10 Aug
nuke13–70.0016%9 Aug
dust213–00.0415%9 Aug
poseidon9–10.0921%9 Aug
mirage8–1-0.017%9 Aug
mirage13–50.0510%9 Aug
office13–4-0.0120%8 Aug
nuke13–110.1324%8 Aug
anubis12–12-0.0116%8 Aug
nuke13–100.0223%7 Aug
poseidon4–9-0.0721%7 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0811%7 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0520%7 Aug
office13–4-0.079%7 Aug
office13–3-0.0042%6 Aug
office8–130.0323%6 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0219%5 Aug
vertigo13–90.0833%5 Aug
poseidon4–9-0.0824%4 Aug
mirage13–70.0616%4 Aug
poseidon8–8-0.0415%3 Aug
poseidon9–50.2812%2 Aug
poseidon3–9-0.2319%2 Aug
vertigo4–90.004%2 Aug
poseidon2–9-0.130%2 Aug
poseidon4–9-0.097%31 Jul
dust213–11-0.0624%26 Jul
poseidon5–9-0.0216%23 Jul
poseidon5–90.0827%22 Jul
poseidon8–80.0526%22 Jul
poseidon4–90.1731%22 Jul
ancient13–50.1216%21 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0713%20 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0115%18 Jul
mirage13–50.0222%18 Jul
anubis13–70.0014%18 Jul
poseidon9–30.0325%18 Jul
poseidon9–60.2310%18 Jul
poseidon8–8-0.0918%16 Jul
poseidon9–50.2018%16 Jul
vertigo9–00.1621%16 Jul
poseidon5–9-0.0313%16 Jul
poseidon9–50.1111%16 Jul
eldorado7–90.0928%16 Jul
poseidon8–8-0.1011%16 Jul
poseidon9–5-0.0015%16 Jul
poseidon0–9-0.2116%16 Jul
poseidon9–40.1811%16 Jul
poseidon9–7-0.0519%16 Jul
poseidon0–9-0.257%15 Jul
poseidon9–10.0612%15 Jul
poseidon9–20.1224%15 Jul
poseidon6–9-0.1216%15 Jul
poseidon9–0-0.02100%15 Jul
poseidon9–60.0613%15 Jul
inferno9–70.0213%13 Jul
poseidon9–70.126%13 Jul
poseidon3–9-0.1310%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →