BenchPressBernhardt — CS2 Stats

76561198453136000[U:1:492870272]

826Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,037Purple band · top ~12.3% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#15417 of 33622 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71

Positioning54

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–48–2Last 10050%Win rateLLWLLLLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.07 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.1

Aggression6.8

Utility5.7

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels2.1

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1

Positioning5.4

Utility5.7

Mechanics6.3

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time536ms−47ms

first ⅓ avg 583ms → last ⅓ avg 536ms

Headshot accuracy18.1%+5.0%

first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — cache 13–6

13–1Biggest win — anubis

5Longest win streak

L2Current streak

3–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 36% over 25

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	C	25	9–16	36%	-0.00
inferno	C	23	10–13	43%	-0.01
cache	A	22	12–10	55%	-0.01
ancient	A	22	14–8	64%	-0.01
dust2	S	6	4–2	67%	0.04
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy

33.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.3%Spray accuracy

78.5%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

528msReaction time

31.3%T opening success

45.2%CT opening success

0.52Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

13.57HE damage / grenade

4.26Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.2993% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	3–13	-0.06	22%	29 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.01	21%	29 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	6%	28 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.04	13%	28 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.12	25%	27 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.08	43%	27 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	9%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.04	26%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–9	-0.07	4%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	12%	25 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.04	17%	25 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.03	18%	25 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	15%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.04	9%	21 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	8%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.06	20%	21 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.07	36%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.03	16%	20 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.06	24%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	25%	20 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	25%	19 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.02	16%	19 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.04	16%	18 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	10%	18 Aug →
anubis	16–12	-0.02	12%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–4	-0.05	7%	16 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	15%	14 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	25%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.05	11%	12 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.01	11%	12 Aug →
anubis	4–13	0.00	27%	11 Aug →
anubis	7–13	0.00	32%	11 Aug →
cache	16–12	0.05	24%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.01	12%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.06	19%	9 Aug →
ancient	16–12	0.01	13%	9 Aug →
ancient	12–16	0.03	11%	9 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.09	14%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.00	7%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.01	25%	8 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.04	33%	8 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	10%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.05	15%	8 Aug →
dust2	2–13	0.01	15%	8 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.10	16%	6 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.08	10%	6 Aug →
ancient	8–13	0.01	24%	4 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.05	12%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	10%	3 Aug →
dust2	16–13	0.09	24%	2 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	25%	2 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	21%	1 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.01	20%	31 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.04	8%	31 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.00	4%	30 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.04	2%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.06	17%	30 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.05	14%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.05	19%	30 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	24%	29 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	12%	29 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.01	14%	28 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.06	7%	28 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.08	0%	27 Jul →
anubis	15–15	-0.03	18%	27 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	17%	22 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	8%	22 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.11	0%	21 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.05	18%	21 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.04	22%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.00	13%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.10	12%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.10	18%	18 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.04	8%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.04	16%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.07	13%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.07	7%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.09	22%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.00	19%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.04	15%	16 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.01	12%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.03	9%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.00	29%	16 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.01	13%	16 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.03	8%	15 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.02	7%	15 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.01	6%	15 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	18%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.03	15%	12 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	13%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.02	29%	12 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.09	16%	11 Jul →
anubis	3–13	0.00	11%	11 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	6%	9 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.02	10%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	14%	9 Jul →
cache	7–0	-0.04	0%	8 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.06	11%	8 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.06	10%	7 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.05	14%	7 Jul →