me1o — CS2 Stats

76561198434627431[U:1:474361703]

816Tracked matches70%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating24,039Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#2252 of 10007 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGme1oPREMIER24,039 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning33
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY64342Last 10064%Win rateWWWWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.5
Aggression4.3
Utility4.0
Positioning3.3
Opening Duels0.5

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 52 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 577ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning3.3
Utility4.0
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.1
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time584ms−26ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.25Best rating — mirage 13–0
130Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
W4Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6anubisWeakest map · 57% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS30201067%0.03
dust2A2213959%0.01
ancientS1711665%0.01
infernoA117464%0.04
anubisA74357%0.02
cacheS65183%0.02
overpass43175%-0.01
nuke31233%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (57% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2Matches
0%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
0Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis10%0.9415.0
Inferno10%1.4320.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
35.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
85.8%Counter-strafing
7.5°Preaim
577msReaction time
17.0%T opening success
46.6%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
4.9%Flash assists
6.54HE damage / grenade
7.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3779 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 17.0019% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0430%5 Aug
cache13–20.0329%29 Jul
ancient13–110.0321%16 Jul
cache13–60.0113%16 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0624%16 Jul
anubis8–130.1014%14 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0217%14 Jul
dust28–00.000%14 Jul
mirage13–100.0219%13 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0119%13 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0210%13 Jul
mirage13–100.0614%12 Jul
ancient13–90.0327%10 Jul
cache13–50.0124%10 Jul
mirage13–20.1321%10 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0315%10 Jul
dust216–13-0.0116%9 Jul
cache0–3-0.040%9 Jul
mirage13–70.0121%5 Jul
anubis13–10-0.019%4 Jul
dust211–13-0.0228%3 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0225%3 Jul
overpass1–13-0.0619%2 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0413%2 Jul
mirage13–50.0814%29 Jun
mirage13–1-0.0450%28 Jun
mirage13–10-0.0516%28 Jun
dust213–5-0.0514%28 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0315%28 Jun
dust213–1-0.010%27 Jun
dust28–13-0.0128%27 Jun
dust213–70.077%27 Jun
mirage13–40.1925%24 Jun
dust211–13-0.0115%21 Jun
dust211–13-0.0421%20 Jun
inferno13–80.0418%20 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0021%19 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0116%19 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0111%18 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0624%18 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0811%18 Jun
ancient4–13-0.1326%17 Jun
inferno11–13-0.039%17 Jun
overpass13–60.0317%17 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0822%17 Jun
dust213–1-0.0120%17 Jun
ancient13–7-0.1011%15 Jun
mirage13–60.1116%15 Jun
dust214–160.0716%15 Jun
dust213–9-0.0116%6 Jun
inferno13–110.0827%6 Jun
mirage13–80.1722%6 Jun
inferno11–130.1030%5 Jun
overpass13–5-0.0028%5 Jun
mirage13–00.2525%4 Jun
ancient13–60.1126%4 Jun
mirage9–130.0718%4 Jun
ancient13–40.1022%3 Jun
nuke5–0-0.050%3 Jun
mirage7–13-0.0622%3 Jun
dust28–13-0.0325%2 Jun
ancient13–70.0625%2 Jun
ancient13–60.0218%2 Jun
mirage13–16-0.0221%2 Jun
mirage13–50.0413%2 Jun
inferno9–130.0331%2 Jun
mirage13–100.1024%1 Jun
ancient13–110.0419%1 Jun
mirage16–14-0.0225%31 May
dust213–60.1117%31 May
dust213–80.0111%31 May
inferno13–40.1039%29 May
mirage7–130.0233%29 May
cache13–20.1327%27 May
inferno13–110.0527%27 May
mirage13–3-0.058%27 May
ancient10–3-0.0116%27 May
mirage13–100.0315%27 May
dust213–40.0211%27 May
dust210–13-0.0218%26 May
ancient5–13-0.0517%26 May
mirage13–50.0519%26 May
ancient10–130.0519%26 May
overpass13–4-0.0313%26 May
mirage13–11-0.0516%25 May
nuke6–13-0.0621%25 May
anubis13–70.0617%24 May
dust213–50.0921%24 May
nuke0–13-0.0317%24 May
inferno13–90.0223%24 May
ancient6–130.0512%24 May
dust213–110.0524%21 May
mirage7–13-0.0112%14 May
dust212–12-0.0317%14 May
ancient13–60.0520%8 May
anubis13–80.0422%8 May
cache13–60.0029%6 May
anubis13–20.0514%3 May
inferno13–20.1538%2 May
dust29–13-0.0213%2 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →