-bray — CS2 Stats

76561198416422732[U:1:456157004]

5,595Tracked matches67%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,806Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.1% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,395 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning54

Utility78

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–38Last 10062%Win rateWWWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression6.9

Utility7.8

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels3.3

Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 64% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 78 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.6° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 64% on CT to 23% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.4

Utility7.8

Mechanics5.2

Opening Duels4.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time541ms−61ms

first ⅓ avg 602ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms

Headshot accuracy26.0%+0.3%

first ⅓ avg 25.8% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.12Best rating — inferno 13–3

13–1Biggest win — ancient

7Longest win streak

W7Current streak

15–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 22dust2Weakest map · 50% over 8

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
anubis	S	22	16–6	73%	0.01
ancient	A	21	13–8	62%	-0.00
cache	S	17	12–5	71%	-0.00
inferno	B	15	8–7	53%	0.01
nuke	A	12	7–5	58%	0.00
dust2	B	8	4–4	50%	0.00
mirage	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.01
overpass	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5,003Matches

52%Win rate

1.13Avg K/D

81.4ADR

50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	565	53%	1.12	16.6
Inferno	362	54%	1.12	16.7
Ancient	259	45%	0.98	16.1
Anubis	256	49%	1.07	16.8
Nuke	248	56%	1.12	16.8
Dust2	163	40%	0.94	15.1
Overpass	68	51%	1.09	16.0
Train	59	51%	1.00	17.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.9%Headshot accuracy

36.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.8%Spray accuracy

73.3%Counter-strafing

10.6°Preaim

536msReaction time

22.6%T opening success

63.8%CT opening success

0.78Enemies flashed / flash

14.1%Flash assists

12.76HE damage / grenade

12.94Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.6315% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	13–8	0.02	26%	27 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.02	32%	26 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.07	23%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.06	36%	26 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.02	43%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.02	31%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	18%	25 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.05	17%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.05	26%	24 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.02	29%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	20%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.07	25%	21 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.03	24%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.07	31%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.12	21%	21 Aug →
anubis	12–16	-0.05	17%	21 Aug →
ancient	19–16	0.04	19%	21 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.05	18%	21 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	27%	20 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.04	15%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.03	27%	18 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.02	42%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.02	28%	17 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.04	33%	17 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.07	32%	15 Aug →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	18%	15 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	35%	15 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.09	10%	15 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.11	36%	15 Aug →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	23%	14 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.05	21%	13 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.01	32%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.00	25%	13 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.05	26%	13 Aug →
anubis	22–20	0.03	25%	12 Aug →
overpass	7–9	-0.12	6%	12 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	40%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–6	0.06	14%	12 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.09	31%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.07	32%	12 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.00	18%	11 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	15%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–5	0.08	30%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	25%	11 Aug →
cache	13–16	-0.03	19%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.02	20%	6 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.07	38%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.07	21%	6 Aug →
inferno	16–13	-0.02	19%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.06	13%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	17%	4 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.06	29%	4 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.01	27%	4 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	23%	3 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.05	36%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	29%	1 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	25%	1 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	22%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	13%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	30%	31 Jul →
cache	19–17	-0.06	15%	30 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	21%	30 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.04	27%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.03	16%	30 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.01	34%	30 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.04	40%	29 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.06	23%	28 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.00	25%	28 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	35%	24 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.01	39%	23 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.03	24%	23 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.08	33%	22 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	35%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.05	31%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.04	18%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	26%	16 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.01	31%	15 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.03	21%	15 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.07	32%	14 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.02	36%	14 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.07	30%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–1	0.09	15%	14 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.02	23%	13 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	13%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	35%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–10	-0.02	23%	12 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.00	27%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	21%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.05	19%	12 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	24%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.06	11%	11 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	31%	11 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.01	22%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.04	23%	11 Jul →
ancient	19–16	-0.01	32%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	7%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	30%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.04	25%	11 Jul →
dust2	16–14	0.02	19%	10 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.03	35%	10 Jul →