Cyrex — CS2 Stats

76561198412314270[U:1:452048542]✓ No bans

1,204Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating15,821Purple band · top ~25.1% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning59

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–42–5Last 10053%Win rateWLWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.3

Aggression7.9

Utility3.1

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels4.4

Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 637ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning5.9

Utility3.1

Mechanics7.4

Opening Duels4.4

Win Impact7.4

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time648ms−20ms

first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 648ms

Headshot accuracy18.9%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 20.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — dust2 12–12

13–0Biggest win — cache

4Longest win streak

9–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 67% over 6mirageWeakest map · 38% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	43	21–22	49%	0.01
mirage	C	13	5–8	38%	-0.00
inferno	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.01
cache	A	12	7–5	58%	0.01
anubis	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.02
ancient	S	6	4–2	67%	0.00
nuke	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
shelter	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

5Matches

40%Win rate

0.88Avg K/D

75.0ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win

50%1v2 clutch win

2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	2	100%	0.82	17.0
Nuke	1	0%	1.00	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy

34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.0%Spray accuracy

83.3%Counter-strafing

7.6°Preaim

637msReaction time

39.5%T opening success

55.9%CT opening success

0.74Enemies flashed / flash

2.6%Flash assists

5.75HE damage / grenade

3.72Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 3.7236 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.4566% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	13–6	0.07	24%	26 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.01	29%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	12%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.01	21%	26 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	18%	25 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.05	19%	25 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.03	19%	24 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.05	21%	24 Aug →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	18%	24 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.04	23%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.03	9%	23 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.05	17%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.03	17%	23 Aug →
cache	13–0	0.12	27%	23 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.03	22%	22 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.04	28%	22 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.09	9%	22 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	24%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.01	17%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.04	16%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–9	0.03	14%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.05	23%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–16	-0.05	13%	2 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.01	32%	1 Aug →
dust2	9–1	0.12	29%	1 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	18%	1 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	30%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.05	15%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–6	-0.06	3%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.03	14%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	16%	1 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.07	13%	31 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	17%	31 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	6%	31 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	25%	31 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	33%	31 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	22%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.03	23%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	18%	30 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.04	21%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–3	-0.07	10%	30 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	6%	29 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.13	38%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.06	8%	29 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	26%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.02	10%	27 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.04	21%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.03	23%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.03	30%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.07	21%	26 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	27%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.04	30%	26 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.05	21%	25 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	16%	25 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.03	28%	25 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.01	21%	25 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.03	9%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	22%	25 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	14%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.03	19%	24 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	12%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.06	32%	24 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.08	17%	22 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	26%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.05	14%	22 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.00	17%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	14%	21 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	20%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	19%	20 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	15%	20 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.04	9%	19 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.02	16%	19 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.02	35%	19 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.05	4%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	31%	18 Jul →
dust2	12–16	0.01	34%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.01	7%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.02	13%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.02	47%	18 Jul →
dust2	16–12	0.10	27%	17 Jul →
dust2	2–13	0.01	30%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	12%	16 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.02	12%	16 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.12	25%	16 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.00	17%	16 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	29%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–5	-0.02	12%	15 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	25%	14 Jul →
cache	1–13	-0.07	11%	14 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	15%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–3	-0.07	14%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.05	31%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.04	15%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.03	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	17%	12 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	30%	12 Jul →
shelter	13–4	-0.01	21%	9 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.05	26%	9 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.03	17%	9 Jul →