Celery — CS2 Stats

76561198407880159[U:1:447614431]✓ No bans

2,148Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,405Purple band · top ~26.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#12784 of 20395 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCeleryFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER15,405 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning52
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49483Last 10049%Win rateLLLWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression7.1
Utility3.1
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 53% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.2
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time620ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy21.3%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 21.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — vertigo 9–7
131Biggest win — cache
8Longest win streak
L3Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC31131842%0.03
nukeB189950%0.03
cacheC167944%0.04
dust2C146843%0.02
anubisA117464%0.03
infernoC52340%0.03
ancient330100%-0.01
vertigo220100%0.17

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

60Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
83.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
100%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage956%0.9815.6
Vertigo667%1.0515.7
Ancient667%0.9215.0
Anubis540%0.8214.6
Inferno560%1.1513.8
Nuke367%1.1615.7
Dust2333%1.0417.3
Overpass2100%1.1427.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.5%Headshot accuracy
33.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.1%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
621msReaction time
32.7%T opening success
52.7%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
2.6%Flash assists
8.22HE damage / grenade
3.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4798 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.6684% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0222%29 Aug
mirage4–130.0124%29 Aug
cache9–130.0519%28 Aug
cache16–140.0522%25 Aug
ancient13–40.0320%22 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0820%22 Aug
dust24–130.0524%18 Aug
dust210–130.0533%18 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0216%16 Aug
dust23–13-0.0632%16 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0724%16 Aug
dust26–130.0528%15 Aug
inferno4–130.0126%15 Aug
mirage13–70.0420%15 Aug
mirage0–10-0.0514%15 Aug
anubis6–130.0719%13 Aug
mirage1–13-0.105%13 Aug
anubis13–9-0.0112%11 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0213%11 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0116%11 Aug
nuke16–130.039%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.0020%10 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0510%10 Aug
nuke3–130.0218%10 Aug
inferno13–60.1530%10 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1125%10 Aug
mirage7–130.1721%9 Aug
cache13–160.0232%8 Aug
vertigo9–70.2252%8 Aug
mirage3–130.0914%8 Aug
mirage10–130.0827%8 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0023%8 Aug
cache11–13-0.0117%4 Aug
nuke13–90.0411%4 Aug
mirage13–60.0523%4 Aug
nuke8–130.0124%4 Aug
mirage4–130.0310%3 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0320%31 Jul
nuke11–130.1218%30 Jul
cache13–100.0714%30 Jul
anubis13–8-0.062%28 Jul
cache13–90.0421%28 Jul
nuke9–130.0423%27 Jul
cache13–90.0118%24 Jul
nuke13–11-0.034%24 Jul
mirage13–160.018%23 Jul
dust213–40.1023%23 Jul
nuke13–16-0.0419%23 Jul
nuke13–110.0710%23 Jul
mirage5–130.0117%23 Jul
anubis13–60.078%22 Jul
mirage8–13-0.039%22 Jul
ancient13–7-0.025%22 Jul
cache7–13-0.0129%22 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0511%22 Jul
cache13–10.0427%22 Jul
mirage13–60.0215%21 Jul
inferno11–130.0317%21 Jul
cache14–16-0.0214%21 Jul
mirage13–80.0012%20 Jul
mirage9–130.0023%20 Jul
cache13–70.1225%20 Jul
anubis13–70.1217%19 Jul
cache9–130.0128%19 Jul
cache13–30.1118%19 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0524%18 Jul
anubis7–130.0717%18 Jul
cache15–150.0822%18 Jul
mirage13–110.0018%18 Jul
inferno13–60.0528%17 Jul
cache7–130.0317%17 Jul
dust213–80.0416%17 Jul
mirage4–130.0925%16 Jul
mirage6–10.0124%16 Jul
mirage10–130.1020%16 Jul
cache15–150.0520%15 Jul
mirage13–70.0420%14 Jul
nuke13–110.0167%8 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0044%8 Jul
nuke12–120.0654%8 Jul
nuke13–90.0644%8 Jul
dust213–40.0024%8 Jul
mirage13–20.0823%8 Jul
dust213–100.0318%8 Jul
dust213–20.0518%8 Jul
mirage13–20.1615%8 Jul
dust213–30.0710%8 Jul
vertigo13–90.1223%7 Jul
mirage7–130.1021%7 Jul
mirage13–80.0720%7 Jul
nuke13–80.0514%7 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0114%6 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0119%6 Jul
dust26–13-0.0224%6 Jul
dust25–13-0.0115%6 Jul
anubis13–110.0316%6 Jul
nuke13–110.0519%6 Jul
anubis10–20.0512%5 Jul
anubis13–90.1423%5 Jul
mirage13–110.0513%5 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →