Bla1se_ — CS2 Stats

76561198400941960[U:1:440676232]✓ No bans

4,424Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.7 SolidHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,306 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim89

Positioning55

Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT48–50–2Last 10048%Win rateLWWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.9

Aggression6.2

Utility6.4

Positioning5.5

Opening Duels1.4

Clutch3.2

Sharp aimerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 95% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 89 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 553ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.9

Positioning5.5

Utility6.4

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels1.5

Win Impact6.1

Composite 6.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time555ms−2ms

first ⅓ avg 557ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms

Headshot accuracy28.1%−0.2%

first ⅓ avg 28.3% → last ⅓ avg 28.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — dust2 13–4

13–3Biggest win — dust2

5Longest win streak

10–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 63% over 16infernoWeakest map · 29% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	A	21	12–9	57%	-0.01
anubis	A	16	10–6	63%	0.01
mirage	B	15	7–8	47%	0.01
ancient	B	15	8–7	53%	0.03
inferno	D	14	4–10	29%	0.02
cache	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.02
nuke	—	4	2–2	50%	0.00
eldorado	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.13
debris	—	2	1–1	50%	0.04
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,461Matches

50%Win rate

1.17Avg K/D

81.2ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	472	47%	1.24	17.0
Anubis	414	55%	1.19	16.6
Inferno	398	54%	1.21	16.6
Mirage	368	50%	1.13	16.6
Ancient	240	48%	1.15	16.8
Nuke	134	49%	1.09	16.3
Vertigo	81	51%	1.12	15.8
Overpass	43	47%	1.07	15.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

27.6%Headshot accuracy

34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.5%Spray accuracy

86.5%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

553msReaction time

29.0%T opening success

42.3%CT opening success

0.70Enemies flashed / flash

11.1%Flash assists

7.82HE damage / grenade

11.35Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.0476% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	8–13	-0.00	46%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.02	35%	25 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	30%	25 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.06	24%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.04	38%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.02	39%	20 Aug →
anubis	15–19	-0.04	23%	18 Aug →
cache	13–4	-0.07	20%	17 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.04	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	15%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.08	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.00	30%	11 Aug →
dust2	13–3	0.03	44%	11 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	31%	11 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.09	15%	8 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.03	37%	8 Aug →
cache	2–13	-0.03	37%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	12%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	17%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	17%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.04	39%	7 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.04	29%	7 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.09	19%	7 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.09	19%	7 Aug →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	18%	6 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.04	29%	29 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.05	26%	29 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	29%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.10	48%	26 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.05	26%	25 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.02	24%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.08	26%	24 Jul →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	42%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–16	0.07	17%	22 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.06	19%	22 Jul →
inferno	1–13	-0.03	30%	22 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.03	27%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.05	24%	21 Jul →
dust2	9–13	0.03	24%	21 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.03	27%	21 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.03	18%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.10	22%	16 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.03	36%	16 Jul →
ancient	3–13	-0.04	24%	16 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.04	20%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.01	27%	15 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	14%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	16%	15 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	28%	15 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	14%	15 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	19%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	25%	14 Jul →
anubis	22–20	0.02	27%	13 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.00	16%	13 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.08	30%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.14	47%	13 Jul →
cache	16–14	-0.05	34%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	23%	13 Jul →
eldorado	5–9	0.02	40%	13 Jul →
debris	8–8	0.01	19%	13 Jul →
poseidon	8–8	-0.00	22%	13 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.06	22%	13 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.03	33%	13 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	67%	13 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.02	34%	12 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	27%	12 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	16%	12 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	40%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.02	44%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.04	17%	12 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.04	19%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.09	35%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	29%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	33%	11 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	10%	11 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.01	14%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.05	29%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.12	31%	11 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.01	40%	11 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.04	27%	11 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	30%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.08	25%	10 Jul →
inferno	6–13	0.02	18%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.12	31%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.00	30%	10 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.02	17%	10 Jul →
mirage	19–17	0.02	27%	10 Jul →
eldorado	0–9	-0.29	50%	10 Jul →
debris	9–5	0.07	34%	10 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.08	26%	9 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	55%	9 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	19%	9 Jul →
inferno	10–13	0.01	28%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	33%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–8	0.02	23%	9 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.00	14%	9 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.05	22%	9 Jul →
inferno	14–16	-0.02	17%	9 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.01	40%	8 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.04	26%	8 Jul →