Pew — CS2 Stats

76561198397487581[U:1:437221853]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,511Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,832Purple band · top ~13.1% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#8033 of 15746 tracked

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64

Positioning42

Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–53–5Last 10042%Win rateLLTWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.4

Aggression4.3

Utility2.1

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 614ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4

Positioning4.2

Utility2.1

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels1.2

Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.04

Reaction time611ms−32ms

first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 611ms

Headshot accuracy19.8%−2.0%

first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 19.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 9–4

13–1Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

7–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6dust2Weakest map · 32% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	23	9–14	39%	-0.01
dust2	D	19	6–13	32%	-0.01
ancient	C	17	7–10	41%	-0.02
nuke	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.03
cache	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.04
anubis	A	9	5–4	56%	-0.02
inferno	S	6	4–2	67%	0.02
overpass	—	4	3–1	75%	0.00
train	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

519Matches

51%Win rate

1.01Avg K/D

72.7ADR

42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	41	41%	0.84	14.8
Nuke	37	57%	1.16	14.9
Ancient	31	61%	0.86	14.6
Anubis	30	53%	1.29	14.4
Inferno	24	38%	0.90	14.0
Dust2	13	38%	0.92	13.3
Vertigo	6	67%	1.10	14.8
Overpass	4	50%	0.84	13.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.1%Headshot accuracy

31.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.3%Spray accuracy

79.2%Counter-strafing

9.9°Preaim

614msReaction time

29.6%T opening success

39.2%CT opening success

0.27Enemies flashed / flash

3.3%Flash assists

6.95HE damage / grenade

3.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2741 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.5879% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	2–13	-0.09	15%	26 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.12	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	15–15	0.02	23%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.07	14%	25 Jul →
ancient	0–12	-0.07	0%	24 Jul →
cache	1–2	-0.12	0%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	18%	24 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	38%	24 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	25%	23 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.04	21%	23 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	25%	23 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.09	60%	23 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.05	27%	22 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.06	9%	22 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.01	17%	19 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.00	17%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	21%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	45%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.00	18%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.04	16%	15 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	24%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.01	31%	15 Jul →
ancient	16–12	-0.01	14%	15 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.00	5%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–16	-0.04	21%	13 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.11	0%	12 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.01	20%	12 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–2	-0.07	11%	10 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.01	21%	10 Jul →
train	2–13	-0.06	17%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	-0.00	23%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	19%	8 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	28%	6 Jul →
cache	4–13	-0.05	18%	6 Jul →
anubis	16–13	-0.06	20%	6 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	18%	6 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	20%	5 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.09	21%	3 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.09	22%	1 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.07	16%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–7	0.02	39%	1 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.04	28%	1 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	20%	28 Jun →
overpass	13–8	0.05	19%	28 Jun →
overpass	13–7	-0.01	11%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–1	0.14	27%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.02	25%	28 Jun →
train	13–11	0.01	19%	28 Jun →
cache	1–13	-0.08	36%	28 Jun →
anubis	13–6	0.00	29%	26 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.04	18%	26 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.03	20%	25 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	27%	24 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.07	19%	24 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.05	14%	24 Jun →
ancient	13–9	0.04	28%	24 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.05	22%	24 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	32%	24 Jun →
nuke	13–7	0.08	20%	24 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.07	23%	24 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	18%	24 Jun →
dust2	16–13	0.03	38%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.04	19%	22 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	17%	22 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	18%	22 Jun →
nuke	9–7	0.01	19%	22 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	29%	21 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.02	16%	21 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.06	24%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.05	28%	21 Jun →
inferno	5–13	-0.10	17%	20 Jun →
ancient	12–12	0.04	37%	20 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.00	22%	17 Jun →
overpass	8–13	-0.06	19%	17 Jun →
inferno	4–13	-0.01	15%	17 Jun →
anubis	16–14	0.00	17%	17 Jun →
ancient	1–13	-0.09	8%	17 Jun →
nuke	10–13	-0.05	18%	16 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.00	21%	15 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.02	17%	14 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.00	8%	14 Jun →
nuke	0–8	-0.08	14%	14 Jun →
inferno	9–4	0.16	20%	14 Jun →
nuke	9–5	0.01	29%	14 Jun →
mirage	10–13	0.07	25%	14 Jun →
cache	13–3	0.07	9%	14 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	31%	14 Jun →
mirage	8–13	0.04	20%	14 Jun →
dust2	12–12	0.04	21%	14 Jun →
dust2	16–13	-0.04	11%	10 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.01	29%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	33%	5 Jun →
ancient	8–1	-0.05	31%	5 Jun →
ancient	13–8	-0.01	10%	5 Jun →
inferno	13–10	0.09	34%	4 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.12	18%	4 Jun →
ancient	4–13	-0.06	55%	3 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.09	25%	31 May →
nuke	10–13	-0.04	12%	31 May →