Dyl — CS2 Stats

76561198393861442[U:1:433595714]Steam profile ↗

3,602Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.3 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating20,508Pink band · top ~7.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#9606 of 24499 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,641 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77

Positioning64

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–46–6Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLTLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7

Aggression10.0

Utility5.3

Positioning6.4

Opening Duels5.1

Clutch4.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like device 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7

Positioning6.4

Utility5.3

Mechanics5.9

Opening Duels5.1

Win Impact4.4

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time543ms−70ms

first ⅓ avg 613ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms

Headshot accuracy21.2%−1.6%

first ⅓ avg 22.9% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — mirage 13–7

13–2Biggest win — ancient

6Longest win streak

5–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 9anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	24	10–14	42%	0.01
inferno	C	18	7–11	39%	0.02
cache	B	17	9–8	53%	0.00
ancient	A	13	8–5	62%	0.02
anubis	D	10	3–7	30%	0.01
dust2	S	9	6–3	67%	0.01
nuke	A	7	4–3	57%	-0.01
debris	—	1	1–0	100%	0.13
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

940Matches

51%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

84.0ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	89	46%	1.10	16.4
Dust2	77	64%	1.27	17.6
Ancient	55	53%	1.22	16.8
Inferno	51	47%	1.11	17.3
Nuke	50	50%	1.17	17.5
Anubis	33	48%	0.85	14.5
Vertigo	20	50%	0.87	14.6
Overpass	15	27%	1.07	16.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy

34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.8%Spray accuracy

76.7%Counter-strafing

8.8°Preaim

552msReaction time

39.5%T opening success

61.0%CT opening success

0.51Enemies flashed / flash

7.1%Flash assists

10.10HE damage / grenade

7.51Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.4709% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–16	-0.04	30%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	17%	2 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.01	22%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.02	35%	1 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	29%	1 Aug →
inferno	12–12	0.01	32%	1 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.01	7%	1 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	17%	1 Aug →
dust2	13–10	0.02	17%	1 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.08	12%	31 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.06	16%	31 Jul →
ancient	13–3	0.09	16%	31 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.00	15%	31 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.00	24%	31 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.01	30%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–2	-0.00	38%	30 Jul →
debris	9–5	0.13	16%	30 Jul →
boulder	7–13	0.09	24%	29 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.01	13%	29 Jul →
inferno	12–12	0.03	26%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.05	24%	28 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.06	25%	28 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.06	24%	28 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.03	21%	27 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.00	32%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–8	-0.02	18%	26 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.08	16%	26 Jul →
cache	0–3	-0.02	0%	26 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.11	18%	26 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	27%	26 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	23%	26 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.01	21%	25 Jul →
cache	13–4	-0.00	16%	25 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	23%	25 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.05	30%	25 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.04	21%	25 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	15%	25 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	21%	24 Jul →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	22%	24 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.08	26%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.02	36%	24 Jul →
cache	11–13	0.03	25%	24 Jul →
inferno	10–13	-0.02	25%	23 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.03	27%	23 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.01	27%	23 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.07	17%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.05	14%	22 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	19%	22 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	10%	21 Jul →
inferno	15–15	0.09	24%	21 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.11	29%	21 Jul →
inferno	16–12	0.08	31%	21 Jul →
cache	10–13	-0.00	20%	21 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	18%	20 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.04	11%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	15%	20 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.05	18%	20 Jul →
mirage	9–13	0.01	22%	19 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	20%	19 Jul →
anubis	10–13	0.02	17%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	23%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.18	19%	19 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	25%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.02	31%	19 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.04	19%	19 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	35%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	29%	19 Jul →
inferno	3–13	0.02	28%	19 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	16%	19 Jul →
cache	13–5	-0.01	20%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.02	15%	19 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	10%	19 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	21%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.07	33%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–6	0.07	14%	19 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	19%	18 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	38%	18 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	30%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.07	29%	18 Jul →
ancient	9–13	-0.02	20%	18 Jul →
anubis	7–13	0.02	24%	18 Jul →
nuke	2–13	-0.07	16%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.00	25%	17 Jul →
anubis	9–13	0.00	31%	17 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.06	12%	17 Jul →
nuke	14–16	-0.06	20%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.04	22%	14 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	19%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.05	19%	14 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.00	18%	14 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.05	28%	14 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.01	13%	13 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.11	29%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.01	34%	13 Jul →
ancient	16–14	0.05	22%	13 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.03	17%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	30%	12 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	30%	12 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.03	23%	12 Jul →