> Blackbird <

> Blackbird < — CS2 Stats

76561198133962555[U:1:173696827]Steam profile ↗

3,615Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating15,116Purple band · top ~27.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15989 of 25547 tracked
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG> Blackbird <FACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER15,116 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning37
Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD49474Last 10049%Win rateLLWTWLLLWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression2.0
Utility4.7
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-fight frequency.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 654ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning3.7
Utility4.7
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels0.0
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time666ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 664ms → last ⅓ avg 666ms
Headshot accuracy14.8%+2.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — ancient 13–5
132Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
122In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 67% over 12infernoWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2081240%-0.00
ancientB1991047%-0.02
anubisA159660%-0.02
infernoD134931%-0.01
dust2S128467%0.01
cacheA117464%-0.00
nukeD93633%-0.03
overpass110100%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.9%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
86.4%Counter-strafing
7.6°Preaim
654msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
28.3%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
5.97HE damage / grenade
7.57Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.9447% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 23.995% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0022%21 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0016%21 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0112%21 Jul
mirage15–150.0411%21 Jul
inferno16–12-0.0215%21 Jul
cache10–13-0.0516%21 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0415%20 Jul
cache6–13-0.0414%20 Jul
anubis13–110.0720%20 Jul
dust215–150.0213%20 Jul
ancient4–13-0.048%20 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0615%18 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0723%18 Jul
nuke2–13-0.1114%17 Jul
inferno13–5-0.018%17 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0613%17 Jul
cache13–11-0.069%17 Jul
dust216–130.0213%16 Jul
mirage7–13-0.029%15 Jul
dust213–11-0.0326%15 Jul
cache7–13-0.0132%15 Jul
mirage13–11-0.019%14 Jul
anubis13–7-0.0114%14 Jul
cache13–40.0422%14 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0111%14 Jul
ancient13–90.0116%13 Jul
cache10–13-0.0016%13 Jul
inferno16–13-0.039%11 Jul
cache13–90.0014%11 Jul
anubis13–110.0019%11 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0216%10 Jul
inferno8–130.0614%10 Jul
mirage10–13-0.056%10 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0515%10 Jul
dust213–7-0.0311%10 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0216%10 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0311%10 Jul
cache13–40.0523%10 Jul
ancient16–130.0016%10 Jul
cache13–60.0113%10 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0419%9 Jul
mirage9–130.016%9 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0317%9 Jul
mirage9–130.0412%9 Jul
ancient13–50.1011%9 Jul
cache13–30.045%9 Jul
anubis13–16-0.0020%8 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0816%8 Jul
inferno8–13-0.046%8 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0413%6 Jul
overpass16–12-0.025%6 Jul
ancient6–13-0.114%6 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0118%6 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0326%5 Jul
ancient13–2-0.0326%5 Jul
mirage13–11-0.026%3 Jul
ancient10–13-0.029%3 Jul
nuke5–13-0.0313%1 Jul
dust213–7-0.0113%29 Jun
mirage13–80.0514%29 Jun
anubis10–5-0.0318%29 Jun
dust25–130.0417%29 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0411%29 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0519%27 Jun
dust213–40.0414%27 Jun
dust213–160.0213%27 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0411%26 Jun
ancient13–5-0.029%26 Jun
ancient13–11-0.092%26 Jun
anubis13–10-0.008%25 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0314%24 Jun
anubis13–70.0112%24 Jun
cache13–8-0.039%23 Jun
inferno7–13-0.038%23 Jun
anubis13–9-0.016%23 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0415%23 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0111%22 Jun
nuke13–100.0213%22 Jun
mirage13–100.0225%22 Jun
inferno11–130.088%22 Jun
inferno13–40.0420%21 Jun
dust213–110.0218%21 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0416%21 Jun
mirage13–80.0914%21 Jun
mirage3–130.0126%21 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0817%20 Jun
ancient13–16-0.0712%20 Jun
anubis13–100.0015%20 Jun
mirage7–130.0313%20 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0716%20 Jun
ancient13–70.0110%20 Jun
nuke9–130.057%20 Jun
dust213–90.0620%20 Jun
nuke13–10-0.0514%16 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0717%16 Jun
inferno8–13-0.049%12 Jun
dust27–13-0.083%12 Jun
nuke10–13-0.008%12 Jun
dust213–110.0619%12 Jun
ancient13–90.079%12 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →