Camo — CS2 Stats

76561198391511728[U:1:431246000]

642Tracked matches45%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCamoFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning52
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateWLTLWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +50pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3
Aggression6.3
Utility4.5
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 569ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning5.2
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.3

Composite 5.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time595ms−10ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 595ms
Headshot accuracy20.4%−3.1%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 20.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 9–2
133Biggest win — overpass
7Longest win streak
116In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 14nukeWeakest map · 8% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2316770%0.03
mirageC145936%0.01
ancientS1410471%0.04
nukeD121118%0.01
dust2A106460%0.01
cacheD93633%0.00
anubisA95456%0.04
overpass32167%0.02
vertigo31233%0.05
train3030%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (8% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

19Matches
37%Win rate
1.31Avg K/D
ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2100%1.9615.0
Nuke1100%1.4124.0
Anubis1100%2.8014.0
Inferno10%1.6441.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
35.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.0%Spray accuracy
79.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
569msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
51.4%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
7.08HE damage / grenade
8.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4581 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2054% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

8% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–90.0718%23 Aug
dust25–13-0.0620%23 Aug
cache15–150.0134%6 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0417%30 Jul
anubis13–100.0823%27 Jul
inferno9–20.2118%27 Jul
nuke5–9-0.0522%21 Jul
inferno9–60.0414%21 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0622%20 Jul
anubis13–70.0710%19 Jul
cache7–13-0.0516%19 Jul
cache9–13-0.0421%18 Jul
dust216–140.0217%17 Jul
inferno8–80.0331%16 Jul
cache5–13-0.026%13 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0112%13 Jul
inferno13–16-0.0020%13 Jul
cache8–13-0.0015%7 Jul
cache7–13-0.0017%27 Jun
nuke7–90.0223%27 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0518%24 Jun
ancient7–130.0624%24 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0512%23 Jun
inferno9–40.1017%23 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0033%22 Jun
dust27–130.0319%22 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0126%22 Jun
overpass13–110.0525%18 Jun
inferno2–00.1340%18 Jun
anubis13–11-0.0022%18 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0124%18 Jun
ancient13–80.0612%17 Jun
nuke11–130.1126%17 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0622%16 Jun
overpass13–3-0.0019%16 Jun
anubis13–100.0415%16 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0225%15 Jun
mirage13–70.0327%3 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0010%25 May
nuke9–13-0.0517%25 May
dust213–90.0428%25 May
inferno13–100.0411%24 May
mirage3–13-0.0315%24 May
mirage13–60.0125%24 May
inferno3–13-0.0321%24 May
ancient13–100.0112%17 May
cache13–90.1016%17 May
ancient13–11-0.0624%16 May
dust213–7-0.0021%16 May
inferno13–30.0327%10 May
cache13–90.0320%2 May
cache13–110.0027%2 May
anubis8–13-0.0323%28 Apr
ancient13–60.0215%28 Apr
inferno0–9-0.110%28 Apr
dust211–130.0333%28 Apr
ancient16–140.0514%27 Apr
vertigo7–130.0219%26 Apr
ancient7–10.0517%26 Apr
inferno13–100.0915%26 Apr
anubis13–70.1418%26 Apr
ancient11–130.0315%26 Apr
vertigo9–130.0718%26 Apr
train9–130.1126%26 Apr
train7–130.0226%26 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0118%25 Apr
inferno13–50.0722%25 Apr
dust213–7-0.0022%25 Apr
ancient8–130.0322%25 Apr
mirage13–90.0722%25 Apr
nuke9–130.0423%25 Apr
ancient13–110.0921%23 Apr
nuke8–130.0114%23 Apr
anubis12–160.0320%23 Apr
mirage8–130.0229%23 Apr
nuke5–130.0321%12 Apr
ancient8–130.0513%12 Apr
overpass11–130.0319%12 Apr
inferno13–4-0.0533%12 Apr
ancient13–50.0717%12 Apr
anubis10–130.0318%5 Apr
mirage6–130.0222%5 Apr
dust216–13-0.0517%5 Apr
inferno13–40.1636%29 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0016%29 Jan
inferno13–110.1114%23 Dec
nuke3–13-0.0721%20 Oct
train5–13-0.0521%19 Oct
mirage8–130.0133%19 Oct
ancient13–8-0.0030%19 Oct
inferno9–70.1121%19 Oct
nuke13–70.0931%18 Oct
vertigo13–50.0732%18 Oct
mirage13–30.0116%28 Sept
ancient13–90.1330%28 Sept
inferno11–2-0.0123%28 Sept
dust26–130.0419%28 Sept
mirage5–130.0743%23 Aug
nuke8–120.1136%8 Aug
inferno5–9-0.0221%8 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →