Jonathan Rodrickson Esquire III

Jonathan Rodrickson Esquire III — CS2 Stats

US76561198377710144[U:1:417444416]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

793Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating12,948Blue band · top ~39.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#36819 of 55643 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,131 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJonathan Rodrickson Esqui…FACEITLevel 5 · 1,131 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER12,948 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning60
Utility11

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41536Last 10041%Win rateWLLLLTWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression9.8
Utility1.1
Positioning6.0
Opening Duels4.2
Clutch1.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

device

Plays most like device 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 645ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning6.0
Utility1.1
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels4.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.06
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time627ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 627ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%+6.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.4% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — inferno 9–3
133Biggest win — cache
4Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 29% over 14
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB22101245%0.01
dust2C1761135%-0.01
cacheC156940%0.01
anubisA149564%-0.00
mirageD1441029%-0.00
nukeC114736%-0.02
ancientD72529%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

29Matches
48%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
59.8ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage862%0.7811.6
Inferno667%0.8613.0
Ancient650%0.7313.2
Dust2540%0.498.6
Nuke30%0.467.3
Overpass10%0.8315.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.3%Headshot accuracy
36.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.4%Spray accuracy
76.3%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
645msReaction time
47.5%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.27Enemies flashed / flash
1.2%Flash assists
8.52HE damage / grenade
0.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2685 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0212%30 Aug
cache8–13-0.0011%30 Aug
inferno4–130.0214%30 Aug
dust210–130.0713%30 Aug
dust26–130.0316%29 Aug
dust212–120.0817%29 Aug
cache13–90.1123%29 Aug
cache10–130.1013%25 Aug
cache11–130.0619%25 Aug
inferno13–50.0018%24 Aug
nuke12–120.0528%24 Aug
anubis13–50.0623%24 Aug
nuke8–1-0.0730%24 Aug
cache13–5-0.0615%23 Aug
nuke13–80.0125%22 Aug
mirage14–160.0510%22 Aug
dust212–12-0.0323%22 Aug
inferno8–80.0136%22 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0717%22 Aug
inferno9–70.0522%21 Aug
inferno6–9-0.0618%21 Aug
inferno5–9-0.125%21 Aug
inferno9–40.2220%21 Aug
inferno3–90.0119%21 Aug
inferno9–50.1330%21 Aug
inferno11–130.1324%21 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0420%21 Aug
inferno4–9-0.0919%21 Aug
inferno9–30.3021%21 Aug
dust210–13-0.0120%15 Aug
inferno13–100.0111%14 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0119%10 Aug
mirage13–50.1236%9 Aug
anubis13–5-0.047%6 Aug
dust213–100.0217%5 Aug
mirage3–130.0111%5 Aug
anubis15–150.0023%5 Aug
dust27–130.0529%4 Aug
cache13–3-0.0314%4 Aug
dust216–120.0216%4 Aug
mirage1–40.1450%4 Aug
ancient7–13-0.067%2 Aug
ancient12–12-0.019%2 Aug
anubis13–6-0.0019%2 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0117%2 Aug
dust211–130.0613%2 Aug
dust210–13-0.0214%1 Aug
cache8–13-0.0815%1 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0318%1 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0722%1 Aug
inferno13–90.0015%1 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0313%31 Jul
cache8–130.0919%30 Jul
anubis9–130.0118%29 Jul
anubis8–13-0.0510%26 Jul
mirage9–13-0.098%26 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0117%26 Jul
dust213–11-0.054%26 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0913%25 Jul
cache2–130.0117%22 Jul
nuke5–130.1111%22 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0511%19 Jul
cache11–13-0.0715%19 Jul
dust213–9-0.0319%19 Jul
nuke16–14-0.0521%19 Jul
anubis13–90.0113%19 Jul
cache13–70.0422%19 Jul
ancient1–13-0.1110%18 Jul
cache9–130.0121%18 Jul
dust28–13-0.0818%18 Jul
anubis13–30.0836%18 Jul
dust22–13-0.066%17 Jul
dust23–13-0.120%17 Jul
mirage13–60.019%17 Jul
anubis13–7-0.048%16 Jul
nuke13–6-0.079%16 Jul
anubis7–13-0.059%16 Jul
nuke12–160.0011%15 Jul
cache13–40.0716%15 Jul
anubis13–90.0012%15 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0421%15 Jul
anubis13–110.0519%14 Jul
cache8–13-0.0714%14 Jul
mirage11–13-0.059%14 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0121%13 Jul
cache13–110.0011%13 Jul
ancient13–90.0114%13 Jul
inferno13–10-0.049%13 Jul
anubis13–11-0.0521%13 Jul
mirage4–13-0.088%13 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0017%12 Jul
inferno9–13-0.055%12 Jul
dust213–5-0.0117%12 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0713%12 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0811%12 Jul
dust216–14-0.038%12 Jul
mirage13–70.0213%12 Jul
nuke2–13-0.0722%12 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0412%11 Jul
nuke6–13-0.0611%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →