ZnL. — CS2 Stats

76561198373612335[U:1:413346607]✓ No bans

147Tracked matches73%Win rate2023Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating16,517Purple band · top ~22.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#22038 of 39401 tracked

FaceitLevel 7Top 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85

Positioning53

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT57–35–8Last 10057%Win rateWWWWWLWWWT

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.5

Aggression7.2

Utility4.1

Positioning5.3

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch8.0

Sharp aimerReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5

Positioning5.3

Utility4.1

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time623ms+8ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 623ms

Headshot accuracy21.0%−0.6%

first ⅓ avg 21.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — inferno 9–4

13–0Biggest win — vertigo

7Longest win streak

W5Current streak

5–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

1Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 81% over 16mirageWeakest map · 33% over 15

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	S	20	13–7	65%	0.02
dust2	S	16	13–3	81%	0.00
mirage	D	15	5–10	33%	0.01
inferno	C	14	5–9	36%	-0.01
nuke	S	9	7–2	78%	0.02
anubis	A	7	4–3	57%	0.01
vertigo	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.00
ancient	—	4	1–3	25%	-0.02
train	—	3	3–0	100%	0.02
boulder	—	3	2–1	67%	0.04
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.01
eldorado	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 15). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

146Matches

58%Win rate

1.12Avg K/D

92.9ADR

43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

60%1v1 clutch win

40%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	7	86%	1.82	18.0
Inferno	5	80%	1.52	18.0
Cache	4	100%	1.84	20.3
Mirage	1	0%	0.61	11.0
Anubis	1	100%	1.90	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.0%Headshot accuracy

38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.5%Spray accuracy

87.5%Counter-strafing

8.3°Preaim

612msReaction time

36.9%T opening success

49.0%CT opening success

0.41Enemies flashed / flash

5.5%Flash assists

8.65HE damage / grenade

6.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4093 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.8598% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 15 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
nuke	13–2	0.03	10%	29 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.02	20%	29 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	12%	26 Aug →
cache	16–13	-0.00	37%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–8	-0.01	22%	25 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	22%	24 Aug →
dust2	13–2	0.09	21%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	20%	23 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.00	11%	23 Aug →
cache	12–12	-0.01	20%	22 Aug →
train	13–7	0.04	32%	22 Aug →
vertigo	13–0	0.07	28%	22 Aug →
mirage	12–12	0.04	23%	22 Aug →
anubis	7–0	0.11	24%	22 Aug →
anubis	12–12	0.05	15%	22 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.13	33%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.04	10%	22 Aug →
ancient	12–12	-0.05	12%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.04	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	3–11	0.00	28%	22 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	14%	21 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.02	15%	21 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.03	23%	21 Aug →
nuke	7–13	0.04	28%	21 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.05	20%	21 Aug →
boulder	9–13	0.03	16%	21 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.03	23%	21 Aug →
train	13–7	0.03	26%	20 Aug →
inferno	8–8	0.04	21%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.01	19%	19 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.03	38%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	17%	19 Aug →
mirage	1–13	-0.06	15%	18 Aug →
cache	4–13	-0.00	18%	18 Aug →
boulder	13–4	0.08	24%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.00	16%	16 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.09	17%	16 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.04	22%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–5	0.07	11%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–9	-0.04	33%	16 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.07	9%	16 Aug →
train	13–6	0.00	13%	16 Aug →
overpass	8–8	-0.04	10%	16 Aug →
nuke	9–3	0.05	23%	16 Aug →
vertigo	8–8	0.03	21%	16 Aug →
eldorado	8–8	-0.08	7%	16 Aug →
inferno	5–9	0.02	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.06	22%	15 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.14	26%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.04	21%	15 Aug →
nuke	9–7	0.10	12%	14 Aug →
inferno	9–4	0.21	35%	14 Aug →
vertigo	13–8	0.03	18%	14 Aug →
nuke	7–0	-0.04	0%	14 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	16%	13 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.06	30%	12 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	18%	12 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	30%	11 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.03	21%	11 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	13%	11 Aug →
inferno	6–9	-0.01	26%	10 Aug →
inferno	3–9	-0.11	36%	10 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.05	11%	9 Aug →
mirage	2–13	-0.04	18%	9 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.01	18%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.04	24%	9 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.00	18%	9 Aug →
boulder	13–7	0.03	24%	9 Aug →
mirage	13–1	-0.02	24%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.01	25%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–7	0.01	8%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	20%	8 Aug →
anubis	11–13	-0.07	18%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.07	24%	8 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	10%	8 Aug →
overpass	13–1	0.02	10%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.07	29%	8 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	6%	8 Aug →
vertigo	3–13	-0.04	9%	8 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.04	24%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.04	15%	7 Aug →
mirage	10–3	-0.02	12%	7 Aug →
cache	13–9	-0.05	30%	7 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.04	30%	7 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.02	20%	7 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.01	30%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.02	18%	5 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.04	42%	5 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.04	28%	4 Aug →
anubis	3–13	-0.04	21%	4 Aug →
cache	13–4	0.08	26%	4 Aug →
inferno	9–13	0.04	30%	4 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	19%	3 Aug →
vertigo	2–9	-0.23	13%	3 Aug →
vertigo	9–1	0.12	41%	3 Aug →
nuke	9–4	0.03	21%	3 Aug →
inferno	0–9	-0.27	0%	3 Aug →
mirage	7–13	0.07	29%	3 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	32%	3 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.05	24%	3 Aug →