TheTrueShay

TheTrueShay — CS2 Stats

76561198357435113[U:1:397169385]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,092Tracked matches59%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,434Top 50% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#9774 of 37451 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,939 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTheTrueShayFACEITLevel 7 · 1,939 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER22,434 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning55
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT53452Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.6
Aggression5.4
Utility7.0
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch3.6

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 674ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning5.5
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time677ms+25ms
first ⅓ avg 652ms → last ⅓ avg 677ms
Headshot accuracy20.6%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 19.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.19Best rating — nuke 13–7
131Biggest win — ancient
6Longest win streak
813In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 40% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB28151354%0.01
dust2C2081240%-0.01
infernoB136746%0.00
nukeS107370%0.03
anubisS97278%0.02
ancientC94544%0.01
cacheB63350%0.01
overpass43175%0.06
vertigo1010%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,011Matches
49%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
77.3ADR
48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage30745%1.0215.0
Dust216542%1.0615.2
Inferno14161%1.2316.8
Anubis12147%1.1215.4
Ancient10852%1.0314.9
Nuke8249%1.0916.2
Overpass3158%1.1617.9
Vertigo2774%1.2116.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
32.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
81.5%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
674msReaction time
32.5%T opening success
38.0%CT opening success
0.75Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
11.23HE damage / grenade
12.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.5082% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust24–13-0.0944%26 Aug
dust213–7-0.0717%26 Aug
mirage13–80.0815%20 Aug
nuke13–100.0217%19 Aug
cache5–13-0.0129%13 Aug
anubis13–80.0512%10 Aug
dust214–16-0.0721%4 Aug
mirage13–50.0321%29 Jul
dust213–90.0719%29 Jul
dust213–30.0429%29 Jul
inferno13–50.0112%29 Jul
cache13–80.0323%29 Jul
dust24–130.0020%29 Jul
cache4–13-0.0715%28 Jul
inferno15–150.0119%28 Jul
mirage13–80.0324%28 Jul
anubis13–80.0325%26 Jul
anubis2–13-0.0616%26 Jul
mirage7–130.0121%22 Jul
cache13–90.0530%22 Jul
nuke13–100.0624%21 Jul
dust213–3-0.0113%21 Jul
vertigo5–13-0.0024%20 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0212%17 Jun
inferno4–13-0.1315%29 May
inferno14–160.0226%28 May
dust24–13-0.0513%27 May
dust213–20.0221%27 May
mirage11–130.0317%21 May
dust213–100.0525%20 May
nuke11–13-0.0213%20 May
mirage14–16-0.0228%12 May
mirage7–130.0222%9 May
mirage10–13-0.0615%5 May
cache13–9-0.0222%4 May
cache9–130.0617%3 May
anubis13–11-0.0315%2 May
anubis13–110.0319%1 May
ancient8–130.0320%1 May
mirage13–10-0.0325%30 Apr
dust210–13-0.0332%30 Apr
mirage13–50.0616%29 Apr
mirage6–13-0.0520%29 Apr
ancient16–130.0119%29 Apr
mirage13–6-0.0114%28 Apr
dust210–13-0.0429%28 Apr
nuke13–80.0123%27 Apr
dust211–130.0025%23 Apr
mirage13–80.0917%21 Apr
mirage13–80.0027%21 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0119%20 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0410%19 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0226%17 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0419%15 Apr
ancient9–130.0016%14 Apr
dust25–13-0.0550%14 Apr
mirage3–13-0.0910%14 Apr
mirage13–50.0418%13 Apr
anubis13–9-0.0211%13 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0114%12 Apr
mirage13–60.0329%12 Apr
inferno10–130.0315%12 Apr
mirage23–250.0220%11 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0730%9 Apr
mirage13–110.0522%8 Apr
inferno13–110.0218%2 Apr
nuke13–70.0331%31 Mar
mirage10–13-0.0322%31 Mar
nuke4–13-0.0715%30 Mar
ancient13–10.0812%30 Mar
nuke13–80.0021%30 Mar
mirage9–130.0216%30 Mar
anubis14–160.0418%30 Mar
mirage16–14-0.0222%28 Mar
dust211–13-0.0223%28 Mar
nuke13–70.1923%27 Mar
nuke13–80.0724%27 Mar
overpass13–50.0313%27 Mar
mirage13–50.0127%27 Mar
dust27–13-0.0736%27 Mar
mirage11–13-0.0311%25 Mar
ancient13–100.0317%23 Mar
overpass13–90.1440%23 Mar
dust213–80.1218%23 Mar
inferno13–30.1126%23 Mar
anubis13–50.1323%19 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0218%19 Mar
dust211–130.0314%18 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0218%13 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0220%13 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0317%13 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0419%13 Mar
dust28–13-0.0115%6 Mar
dust213–110.0115%4 Mar
mirage13–20.0518%3 Mar
overpass16–140.0214%2 Mar
inferno13–80.0421%2 Mar
inferno13–110.0218%2 Mar
inferno13–70.0319%28 Feb
overpass15–150.0318%27 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →