Troll — CS2 Stats

76561198356602621[U:1:396336893]

875Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 Developing

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning52

Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateLTWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.05 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression6.7

Utility3.1

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels2.6

Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 611ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning5.2

Utility3.1

Mechanics4.9

Opening Duels2.6

Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00

first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time614ms−16ms

first ⅓ avg 630ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms

Headshot accuracy16.7%−0.3%

first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–0Biggest win — anubis

8Longest win streak

9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

14Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 65% over 17ancientWeakest map · 48% over 21

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	40	21–19	53%	-0.01
ancient	B	21	10–11	48%	-0.02
nuke	S	17	11–6	65%	-0.02
anubis	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.02
office	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.07
inferno	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.06
dust2	—	1	1–0	100%	0.03
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (48% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

926Matches

51%Win rate

1.00Avg K/D

67.1ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win

16%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	31	74%	1.02	14.4
Ancient	15	33%	0.90	15.1
Nuke	8	50%	0.62	11.0
Anubis	7	86%	1.10	15.0
Dust2	5	40%	1.06	16.4
Inferno	1	100%	0.47	8.0
Vertigo	1	0%	1.12	18.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.3%Headshot accuracy

33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.4%Spray accuracy

72.1%Counter-strafing

9.5°Preaim

611msReaction time

31.3%T opening success

49.7%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

3.4%Flash assists

4.31HE damage / grenade

4.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.487 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 31.3404% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

48% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	-0.06	9%	12 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.03	7%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.01	25%	9 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.00	15%	19 Apr →
nuke	2–13	-0.09	32%	19 Apr →
mirage	13–4	-0.05	22%	5 Apr →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	22%	1 Apr →
anubis	13–2	-0.05	25%	1 Apr →
nuke	13–3	-0.09	5%	31 Mar →
mirage	13–7	-0.03	25%	31 Mar →
mirage	13–9	-0.01	11%	30 Mar →
mirage	13–6	0.06	17%	30 Mar →
anubis	13–9	0.04	26%	30 Mar →
ancient	16–12	0.03	19%	30 Mar →
anubis	13–10	0.06	13%	29 Mar →
ancient	7–13	0.01	20%	29 Mar →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	20%	26 Mar →
mirage	13–4	-0.04	12%	25 Mar →
mirage	15–15	0.03	15%	25 Mar →
mirage	13–8	0.03	31%	24 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.07	6%	24 Mar →
mirage	16–14	-0.02	20%	19 Mar →
office	8–13	-0.09	12%	19 Mar →
office	3–13	-0.08	13%	19 Mar →
office	13–4	-0.04	16%	19 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	12%	18 Mar →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	11%	17 Mar →
ancient	13–16	-0.02	10%	16 Mar →
inferno	13–7	-0.07	14%	15 Mar →
dust2	13–10	0.03	18%	14 Mar →
nuke	13–11	-0.04	15%	14 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	17%	14 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.02	19%	14 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.12	12%	14 Mar →
anubis	13–0	0.04	7%	12 Mar →
overpass	13–10	-0.05	15%	12 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	21%	11 Mar →
mirage	8–13	0.03	14%	11 Mar →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	12%	10 Mar →
mirage	13–9	0.04	18%	8 Mar →
ancient	5–13	-0.03	17%	8 Mar →
nuke	13–11	0.03	19%	8 Mar →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	3%	8 Mar →
mirage	16–14	0.06	22%	8 Mar →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	11%	5 Mar →
mirage	13–7	0.02	29%	5 Mar →
anubis	9–13	-0.06	9%	4 Mar →
mirage	13–10	0.03	22%	4 Mar →
ancient	13–7	0.01	12%	4 Mar →
nuke	3–13	-0.02	17%	3 Mar →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	9%	2 Mar →
mirage	15–15	0.06	24%	2 Mar →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	16%	1 Mar →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	5%	1 Mar →
mirage	16–13	-0.04	15%	1 Mar →
mirage	11–13	0.03	7%	1 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	15%	28 Feb →
mirage	13–5	0.01	19%	28 Feb →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	14%	28 Feb →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	6%	28 Feb →
mirage	5–13	-0.04	10%	28 Feb →
anubis	13–4	0.03	18%	28 Feb →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	13%	28 Feb →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	14%	27 Feb →
nuke	13–10	0.01	16%	27 Feb →
ancient	16–14	0.01	14%	27 Feb →
anubis	9–13	-0.07	15%	26 Feb →
mirage	13–6	-0.00	20%	26 Feb →
ancient	13–9	-0.08	13%	26 Feb →
mirage	7–13	-0.03	31%	26 Feb →
nuke	13–4	-0.03	8%	26 Feb →
ancient	13–7	0.01	22%	24 Feb →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	15%	24 Feb →
nuke	13–3	0.11	15%	23 Feb →
anubis	16–14	-0.01	10%	23 Feb →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	32%	23 Feb →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	11%	23 Feb →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	14%	23 Feb →
mirage	13–3	0.13	22%	23 Feb →
ancient	13–7	0.03	21%	23 Feb →
nuke	11–13	-0.05	20%	22 Feb →
nuke	13–5	-0.04	4%	22 Feb →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	31%	22 Feb →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	12%	22 Feb →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	17%	22 Feb →
ancient	13–6	0.02	16%	22 Feb →
mirage	13–7	-0.02	23%	22 Feb →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	8%	22 Feb →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	10%	22 Feb →
mirage	10–13	0.04	15%	22 Feb →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	11%	19 Feb →
anubis	13–8	0.04	28%	19 Feb →
ancient	12–16	-0.07	23%	19 Feb →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	16%	17 Feb →
ancient	16–13	-0.03	9%	17 Feb →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	16%	17 Feb →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	22%	17 Feb →
ancient	13–6	0.08	13%	17 Feb →
ancient	3–13	-0.14	17%	17 Feb →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	18%	16 Feb →