Dukc Draper — CS2 Stats

76561198355452952[U:1:395187224]

1,405Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,679Purple band · top ~13.8% of ranked players (population est.)

FaceitLevel 5 · 1,133 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67

Positioning61

Utility52

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–46Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.7

Aggression7.2

Utility5.2

Positioning6.1

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 576ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7

Positioning6.1

Utility5.2

Mechanics6.6

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time569ms+4ms

first ⅓ avg 565ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms

Headshot accuracy18.3%+3.1%

first ⅓ avg 15.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — mirage 13–4

13–1Biggest win — inferno

6Longest win streak

L3Current streak

9–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 69% over 16dust2Weakest map · 29% over 14

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
nuke	B	17	8–9	47%	0.00
cache	S	16	11–5	69%	-0.01
ancient	A	15	9–6	60%	0.01
anubis	A	14	9–5	64%	0.02
dust2	D	14	4–10	29%	-0.01
mirage	C	13	5–8	38%	0.01
inferno	A	7	4–3	57%	0.02
overpass	—	4	4–0	100%	0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 14). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

146Matches

51%Win rate

0.99Avg K/D

74.9ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

26%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	24	54%	0.96	14.5
Mirage	23	43%	0.87	13.5
Anubis	22	41%	0.94	14.1
Nuke	21	52%	1.23	17.0
Train	19	79%	0.98	14.0
Dust2	17	47%	0.88	11.9
Ancient	16	44%	1.16	18.0
Overpass	3	33%	0.90	17.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.4%Spray accuracy

79.9%Counter-strafing

11.8°Preaim

576msReaction time

39.0%T opening success

44.6%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

7.3%Flash assists

8.69HE damage / grenade

9.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.484 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 39.0477% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 14 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	7–13	0.02	18%	16 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	29%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	17%	16 Aug →
cache	13–2	0.14	18%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.01	19%	16 Aug →
anubis	13–2	0.02	21%	16 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.00	18%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	17%	15 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.07	26%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.00	13%	9 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	20%	9 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.04	11%	9 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.04	15%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–5	-0.02	16%	9 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.06	18%	9 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.07	21%	8 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.03	18%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.01	18%	8 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.05	20%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	20%	8 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.02	20%	8 Aug →
cache	13–7	-0.02	12%	8 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	23%	8 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.07	27%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.02	11%	7 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.02	21%	26 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	6–13	0.03	13%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.05	16%	26 Jul →
nuke	11–13	0.01	28%	26 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.00	15%	25 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	12%	25 Jul →
anubis	14–16	0.00	9%	25 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	7%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	19%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.03	16%	25 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.01	13%	24 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.07	15%	24 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	20%	19 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	18%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.04	17%	19 Jul →
nuke	6–1	0.04	19%	18 Jul →
inferno	13–1	0.04	12%	18 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.03	15%	18 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.16	15%	18 Jul →
cache	13–3	-0.02	13%	18 Jul →
ancient	0–13	-0.03	0%	18 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	8%	11 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	17%	11 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	11%	11 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.01	14%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.07	10%	11 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.03	22%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.03	17%	10 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.07	15%	10 Jul →
nuke	8–13	0.03	18%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–11	0.01	18%	5 Jul →
overpass	13–10	0.02	15%	5 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.02	15%	5 Jul →
anubis	16–14	-0.03	15%	5 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.05	15%	4 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.04	17%	4 Jul →
anubis	8–13	0.04	14%	28 Jun →
nuke	13–8	0.01	8%	28 Jun →
overpass	16–14	0.02	24%	28 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	11%	28 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	28%	28 Jun →
inferno	13–5	0.06	24%	27 Jun →
nuke	9–2	0.05	21%	27 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.03	11%	27 Jun →
ancient	16–12	0.04	10%	27 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.02	11%	27 Jun →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	17%	27 Jun →
ancient	9–13	-0.06	10%	27 Jun →
nuke	13–3	0.08	11%	26 Jun →
anubis	13–7	0.06	19%	21 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.02	18%	21 Jun →
mirage	13–7	-0.01	13%	21 Jun →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	22%	21 Jun →
overpass	13–7	0.00	14%	21 Jun →
nuke	5–13	-0.06	18%	21 Jun →
cache	13–9	-0.01	21%	20 Jun →
nuke	13–16	-0.02	19%	14 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	13%	14 Jun →
anubis	5–13	0.00	16%	14 Jun →
mirage	16–13	-0.00	18%	14 Jun →
ancient	3–13	-0.05	17%	14 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.01	13%	13 Jun →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	15%	7 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	17%	7 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.07	14%	7 Jun →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	19%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–6	0.01	14%	7 Jun →
dust2	4–13	-0.08	3%	6 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.04	16%	6 Jun →
ancient	8–13	0.01	10%	6 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.00	15%	6 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.02	12%	6 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.04	17%	5 Jun →
ancient	16–14	-0.03	13%	31 May →