◢ Perseus ◤

◢ Perseus ◤ — CS2 Stats

DE76561198353133574[U:1:392867846]Steam profile ↗

1,441Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,520Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16212 of 54201 tracked
FaceitLevel 6 · 1,206 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG◢ Perseus ◤FACEITLevel 6 · 1,206 ELOSTANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER21,520 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim77
Positioning44
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.7
Aggression6.7
Utility5.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch5.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 33 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 609ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.7
Positioning4.4
Utility5.7
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels2.7
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time609ms+20ms
first ⅓ avg 588ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy24.3%+5.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.7% → last ⅓ avg 24.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–2
131Biggest win — train
6Longest win streak
611In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 67% over 6anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA1710759%-0.01
cacheB137654%-0.02
infernoD134931%-0.02
dust2C125742%-0.02
trainA95456%-0.03
overpassC73443%-0.04
vertigoS64267%-0.01
anubisD51420%-0.03
fachwerk43175%-0.00
boulder41325%-0.03
nuke31233%-0.01
ancient31233%-0.02
eldorado110100%0.05
shelter1010%0.07
stronghold110100%0.03
warden110100%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

173Matches
51%Win rate
0.94Avg K/D
75.1ADR
36%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

48%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage978%1.0013.6
Inferno888%1.1615.1
Dust2475%1.0816.5
Ancient250%1.1020.0
Anubis1100%0.9416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.4%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
75.0%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
609msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
8.82HE damage / grenade
13.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.0465% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0132%27 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0816%27 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0129%25 Aug
vertigo11–130.0325%25 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0222%23 Aug
overpass1–13-0.0646%22 Aug
cache13–70.0532%22 Aug
mirage13–20.1040%21 Aug
vertigo9–13-0.0726%21 Aug
train13–4-0.0650%21 Aug
inferno13–100.0118%20 Aug
dust213–6-0.0326%20 Aug
mirage13–20.0527%13 Aug
cache13–10-0.0418%12 Aug
inferno13–90.0022%12 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0126%12 Aug
dust29–13-0.0621%9 Aug
cache13–40.0222%9 Aug
overpass2–13-0.1220%8 Aug
fachwerk13–70.0224%8 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0130%7 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0232%7 Aug
anubis10–130.0123%7 Aug
dust213–10-0.0519%6 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0118%6 Aug
anubis13–7-0.0613%2 Aug
ancient11–130.0214%2 Aug
cache13–8-0.0316%2 Aug
cache2–13-0.0929%2 Aug
dust213–11-0.0218%21 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0425%21 Jul
cache13–20.019%19 Jul
mirage16–130.0314%19 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0714%19 Jul
anubis3–13-0.1010%17 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0120%17 Jul
nuke8–4-0.0450%17 Jul
inferno6–13-0.0413%17 Jul
mirage7–130.0124%16 Jul
boulder9–130.0313%16 Jul
overpass13–11-0.0425%16 Jul
boulder11–13-0.0917%16 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0418%14 Jul
fachwerk6–13-0.0618%14 Jul
train13–11-0.0241%14 Jul
cache8–13-0.0531%13 Jul
dust27–13-0.0426%12 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0030%12 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0216%12 Jul
boulder13–8-0.0124%12 Jul
train10–13-0.0620%12 Jul
vertigo13–60.0417%11 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0112%11 Jul
fachwerk11–10.0050%11 Jul
nuke4–130.0116%10 Jul
dust213–50.0432%10 Jul
train3–13-0.0630%10 Jul
eldorado9–40.0530%10 Jul
inferno0–13-0.1029%10 Jul
shelter11–130.0727%9 Jul
boulder6–13-0.0511%9 Jul
fachwerk13–40.0410%9 Jul
cache13–80.0532%7 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0138%7 Jul
dust213–80.0422%7 Jul
train13–50.0313%7 Jul
cache13–8-0.0012%5 Jul
dust211–13-0.0325%5 Jul
vertigo13–50.0132%5 Jul
overpass13–110.0012%5 Jul
train13–1-0.0020%5 Jul
vertigo13–5-0.0131%5 Jul
dust24–13-0.0623%5 Jul
mirage13–90.0117%5 Jul
stronghold13–100.034%4 Jul
anubis1–130.040%4 Jul
cache9–13-0.056%4 Jul
dust24–13-0.0512%2 Jul
inferno16–120.0413%2 Jul
train0–13-0.0911%2 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0621%1 Jul
overpass11–13-0.078%1 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0728%30 Jun
cache12–12-0.0516%30 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0117%28 Jun
train7–13-0.0120%28 Jun
cache7–13-0.0618%28 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0117%24 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0320%24 Jun
anubis10–13-0.0313%24 Jun
vertigo13–11-0.0415%23 Jun
mirage16–13-0.0332%23 Jun
overpass13–60.0423%22 Jun
mirage13–110.0017%22 Jun
mirage7–13-0.1214%21 Jun
train13–100.0329%21 Jun
cache5–130.0333%21 Jun
warden13–3-0.0522%21 Jun
inferno12–120.0223%20 Jun
dust210–130.0026%20 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →