Setna — CS2 Stats

76561198338383845[U:1:378118117]✓ No bans

2,478Tracked matches43%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.7 Learning
Premier CS Rating13,252Blue band · top ~37.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#21299 of 31725 tracked
FaceitLevel 2 · 392 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

13,252Peak Premier on CSDB
392Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 392
  • Next: Level 2 at 501 109 to go

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 13,252
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 1,748 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGSetnaFACEITLevel 2 · 392 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER13,252 · Blue bandPEAK ELO392csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim35
Positioning47
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50473Last 10050%Win rateLWLWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.5
Aggression6.7
Utility6.3
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch0.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 65% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.5
Positioning4.7
Utility6.3
Mechanics3.4
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.6

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time626ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 610ms → last ⅓ avg 626ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — nuke 13–1
131Biggest win — cache
6Longest win streak
117In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 16nukeWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB24111346%-0.02
infernoA1810856%-0.02
nukeC1661038%-0.00
dust2S1611569%-0.02
ancientB147750%-0.02
anubisC73443%0.02
cacheC52340%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

101Matches
50%Win rate
0.72Avg K/D
66.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

21%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3352%0.7311.4
Dust22654%0.6811.3
Inferno1533%0.598.9
Ancient967%0.9315.4
Nuke560%0.738.8
Anubis540%0.8315.0
Overpass560%0.8015.4
Train333%0.5611.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
28.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
28.2%Spray accuracy
65.1%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
624msReaction time
33.5%T opening success
42.4%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
12.0%Flash assists
9.89HE damage / grenade
6.30Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 33.4864% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage14–160.0412%27 Aug
anubis13–70.0418%27 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0126%27 Aug
nuke13–50.0418%27 Aug
cache5–13-0.0811%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0413%27 Aug
anubis6–130.0718%27 Aug
dust211–13-0.0515%27 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0811%27 Aug
cache13–4-0.0223%27 Aug
nuke0–5-0.070%27 Aug
nuke10–130.0010%27 Aug
ancient16–130.006%26 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0140%26 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0618%26 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0237%25 Aug
ancient15–15-0.0113%25 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0526%25 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0317%24 Aug
dust213–110.0217%24 Aug
dust213–16-0.0515%24 Aug
mirage10–13-0.037%24 Aug
ancient10–130.0113%24 Aug
mirage13–4-0.007%24 Aug
inferno13–40.0315%24 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0417%24 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0514%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0418%23 Aug
mirage13–60.0320%23 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0622%23 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0213%23 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0614%23 Aug
dust213–110.0111%22 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0919%22 Aug
nuke16–140.0215%22 Aug
dust24–13-0.0426%22 Aug
dust213–11-0.0225%22 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0123%22 Aug
dust213–4-0.0226%21 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0526%21 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0313%21 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0017%21 Aug
cache13–10.0114%21 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0621%21 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0122%21 Aug
inferno6–130.0310%21 Aug
inferno13–80.0410%21 Aug
dust210–30.0611%21 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0320%20 Aug
inferno13–7-0.029%20 Aug
dust213–6-0.0212%20 Aug
dust213–60.0314%20 Aug
nuke10–130.0512%20 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0326%20 Aug
anubis9–130.0313%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0921%19 Aug
dust213–7-0.0615%19 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0415%19 Aug
mirage13–60.0520%19 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0324%18 Aug
dust213–50.067%18 Aug
inferno13–50.0225%18 Aug
cache4–13-0.0621%18 Aug
dust213–50.0230%18 Aug
mirage13–60.0817%18 Aug
mirage8–13-0.115%18 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0318%18 Aug
dust29–13-0.1112%17 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0219%17 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0021%17 Aug
anubis10–130.0120%14 Aug
mirage13–11-0.033%14 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0314%14 Aug
nuke7–13-0.020%14 Aug
inferno2–13-0.0624%14 Aug
dust213–7-0.079%14 Aug
cache8–13-0.0811%14 Aug
mirage9–130.0318%14 Aug
mirage13–40.0514%14 Aug
inferno13–30.0214%14 Aug
mirage9–13-0.1027%14 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0128%14 Aug
inferno13–11-0.0311%14 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0415%14 Aug
mirage10–130.0213%14 Aug
inferno3–13-0.034%13 Aug
ancient5–130.049%13 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0920%13 Aug
mirage13–30.0716%13 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1014%13 Aug
ancient11–2-0.0411%13 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0214%13 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0115%13 Aug
nuke13–10.0824%13 Aug
nuke11–130.0229%13 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0211%13 Aug
nuke13–70.0617%12 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0415%12 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0517%12 Aug
anubis16–140.0018%12 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →