TAT1RO — CS2 Stats

76561198337243180[U:1:376977452]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

885Tracked matches50%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating15,173Purple band · top ~27.7% of ranked players (population est.)

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning48

Utility39

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY56–40–4Last 10056%Win rateWLLLLLWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression4.4

Utility3.9

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels1.0

Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning4.8

Utility3.9

Mechanics5.1

Opening Duels1.5

Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time589ms−69ms

first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 589ms

Headshot accuracy11.9%−4.7%

first ⅓ avg 16.6% → last ⅓ avg 11.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — inferno 13–4

13–1Biggest win — mirage

8Longest win streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

16Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 44% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	A	28	17–11	61%	0.03
ancient	B	20	10–10	50%	0.01
inferno	B	14	7–7	50%	0.01
nuke	A	12	7–5	58%	0.02
anubis	A	11	6–5	55%	0.01
dust2	C	9	4–5	44%	-0.00
cache	S	5	4–1	80%	0.04
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

27Matches

44%Win rate

0.83Avg K/D

72.5ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Cache	6	33%	0.88	15.2
Dust2	4	75%	1.14	16.3
Ancient	3	67%	1.23	20.0
Mirage	3	33%	0.60	9.3
Inferno	2	50%	0.76	12.0
Anubis	1	0%	0.67	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

12.1%Headshot accuracy

36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.8%Spray accuracy

72.8%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

593msReaction time

26.0%T opening success

42.3%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

3.8%Flash assists

5.83HE damage / grenade

7.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 12.1146% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4328 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.9768% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	13–8	0.06	13%	28 Aug →
nuke	6–13	-0.04	4%	28 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.05	6%	27 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.07	7%	27 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.03	14%	17 Aug →
ancient	4–13	0.03	14%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.06	12%	17 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.12	15%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.04	19%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.15	25%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.06	18%	13 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	11%	13 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	19%	13 Aug →
inferno	4–11	-0.12	0%	12 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.05	18%	10 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.02	12%	10 Aug →
nuke	13–6	0.01	16%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–8	0.02	14%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.03	8%	8 Aug →
anubis	16–13	-0.04	9%	8 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.01	1%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.02	6%	8 Aug →
ancient	5–13	-0.06	12%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.10	8%	8 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.03	11%	7 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	10%	6 Aug →
anubis	0–13	-0.02	13%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.01	10%	6 Aug →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	14%	5 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	20%	5 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.01	10%	5 Aug →
ancient	15–15	0.04	20%	5 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.04	5%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.07	5%	3 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.01	14%	3 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.15	17%	2 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.07	21%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.03	16%	1 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	22%	1 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.01	16%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	8%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–10	0.07	9%	1 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.08	7%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–3	0.08	19%	1 Aug →
ancient	16–14	0.01	10%	31 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	13%	31 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.02	21%	30 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	14%	30 Jul →
inferno	4–13	0.01	11%	30 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	20%	29 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.02	21%	29 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.02	20%	29 Jul →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	14%	28 Jul →
inferno	13–3	0.02	19%	27 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	11%	21 Jul →
ancient	15–15	0.01	7%	20 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.06	16%	20 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.16	12%	20 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.01	15%	20 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.04	16%	19 Jul →
dust2	16–13	0.01	11%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.00	8%	17 Jul →
ancient	13–7	0.02	12%	16 Jul →
inferno	16–12	-0.03	6%	16 Jul →
mirage	16–12	-0.01	8%	16 Jul →
inferno	15–15	-0.01	12%	15 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	19%	15 Jul →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	19%	15 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.02	7%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	32%	13 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.02	11%	13 Jul →
ancient	8–13	0.00	11%	13 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.06	13%	12 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.01	12%	12 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.09	12%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–16	-0.00	19%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–4	0.05	4%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.10	32%	12 Jul →
inferno	13–9	-0.01	22%	12 Jul →
inferno	16–12	0.03	17%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.10	23%	11 Jul →
ancient	14–12	-0.00	17%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–8	0.12	11%	11 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.10	17%	11 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.10	13%	11 Jul →
mirage	4–13	0.00	13%	10 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.02	25%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.09	19%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.15	21%	9 Jul →
cache	4–10	0.00	15%	9 Jul →
anubis	4–13	0.00	18%	9 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.02	16%	8 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	17%	8 Jul →
ancient	16–13	0.05	12%	8 Jul →
cache	16–12	0.01	15%	8 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	-0.01	16%	7 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.03	17%	7 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	11%	7 Jul →
mirage	10–13	0.01	22%	5 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	18%	4 Jul →