Essplass

Essplass — CS2 Stats

GB76561198336256055[U:1:375990327]Steam profile ↗2 game bans

261Tracked matches21%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.1 Learning
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEssplassFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim43
Positioning39
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45523Last 10045%Win rateLLWLLWLLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.3
Aggression2.3
Utility2.1
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 68% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 34% on CT to 18% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.3
Positioning3.9
Utility2.1
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels0.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 3.1/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time605ms−1ms
first ⅓ avg 606ms → last ⅓ avg 605ms
Headshot accuracy15.7%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 12.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.21Best rating — mirage 15–15
132Biggest win — mirage
9Longest win streak
L2Current streak
82In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 16anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC41152637%-0.00
ancientS1611569%0.01
anubisD134931%-0.03
infernoA127558%0.00
dust2A85363%-0.04
nuke41325%-0.03
cache31233%-0.03
overpass2020%-0.05
train110100%0.18

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
50%Win rate
0.49Avg K/D
42.9ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage450%0.457.3
Dust21100%0.678.0
Ancient10%0.447.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
71.4%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
602msReaction time
18.0%T opening success
34.4%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
0.6%Flash assists
5.20HE damage / grenade
2.37Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.013° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4843 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage10–130.0012%16 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0823%12 Jul
ancient13–60.0415%12 Jul
cache3–13-0.0226%12 Jul
mirage4–130.0134%24 May
mirage13–6-0.0010%22 May
mirage2–13-0.110%20 May
inferno3–13-0.0116%20 May
mirage15–15-0.0311%18 May
mirage5–13-0.085%15 May
mirage4–13-0.0817%12 May
nuke2–13-0.0821%11 May
mirage11–130.0420%9 May
anubis9–130.0018%9 May
mirage2–8-0.0540%9 May
mirage13–40.0112%9 May
anubis5–13-0.0319%7 May
mirage2–13-0.0122%7 May
inferno1–13-0.049%7 May
inferno5–130.0213%5 May
anubis10–13-0.0113%5 May
mirage3–13-0.0719%5 May
mirage4–13-0.047%4 May
cache7–13-0.0611%2 May
cache13–70.0122%2 May
dust27–13-0.0820%2 May
anubis13–80.0319%2 May
mirage6–13-0.1011%2 May
ancient13–90.019%2 May
inferno4–13-0.0712%2 May
ancient3–13-0.0320%2 May
dust23–130.015%1 May
mirage7–13-0.037%1 May
mirage0–13-0.0850%1 May
mirage5–130.184%30 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0412%30 Apr
inferno13–11-0.0417%30 Apr
mirage12–16-0.0723%28 Apr
ancient13–9-0.0318%28 Apr
ancient13–50.1345%27 Apr
mirage15–150.2127%26 Apr
inferno13–70.0924%26 Apr
inferno13–90.0912%26 Apr
inferno11–30.1725%25 Apr
mirage7–13-0.0612%24 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0529%24 Apr
inferno13–8-0.016%24 Apr
dust213–10-0.0513%20 Apr
mirage13–9-0.049%19 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0819%18 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0239%18 Apr
anubis1–13-0.0517%11 Apr
ancient10–130.0318%11 Apr
overpass3–13-0.080%1 Apr
anubis6–13-0.109%21 Feb
train13–50.1834%21 Feb
mirage13–50.1124%21 Feb
ancient13–80.1316%18 Feb
anubis10–13-0.018%15 Feb
mirage13–100.0844%15 Feb
ancient13–30.0663%15 Feb
mirage13–70.0812%12 Feb
mirage13–100.0231%11 Feb
ancient16–140.0212%10 Feb
ancient13–60.004%10 Feb
mirage8–130.0312%9 Feb
ancient13–8-0.009%9 Feb
mirage4–13-0.020%9 Feb
ancient13–40.0429%9 Feb
mirage12–120.0416%8 Feb
mirage13–8-0.0213%8 Feb
anubis13–7-0.034%8 Feb
mirage13–20.1715%8 Feb
mirage13–90.0718%8 Feb
nuke13–110.067%8 Feb
dust216–14-0.039%7 Feb
mirage13–11-0.089%7 Feb
dust213–9-0.0717%7 Feb
dust213–3-0.0713%7 Feb
dust28–13-0.0113%6 Feb
ancient9–13-0.0514%5 Feb
inferno13–11-0.0910%5 Feb
ancient13–8-0.027%4 Feb
dust216–14-0.0114%4 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0910%3 Feb
mirage13–20.009%2 Feb
ancient3–13-0.040%2 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0312%2 Feb
nuke6–13-0.056%2 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0710%2 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0412%1 Feb
mirage7–130.0520%1 Feb
overpass10–13-0.029%31 Jan
anubis13–10-0.0410%31 Jan
mirage13–20.0218%31 Jan
mirage13–70.1319%31 Jan
mirage8–13-0.0220%31 Jan
inferno16–13-0.037%30 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0810%30 Jan
anubis13–8-0.0415%30 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →