kant — CS2 Stats

76561198334238211[U:1:373972483]✓ No bans

3,349Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating13,147Blue band · top ~38.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#32001 of 48523 tracked
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,070 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanSilver I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGkantFACEITLevel 5 · 1,070 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,147 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning41
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50491Last 10050%Win rateLWWLWLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression4.6
Utility5.3
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.1
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.9
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time586ms−74ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 586ms
Headshot accuracy15.0%+1.4%
first ⅓ avg 13.7% → last ⅓ avg 15.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — inferno 13–11
132Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
139In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 73% over 22mirageWeakest map · 35% over 34
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC34122235%-0.02
ancientB24121250%-0.03
infernoS2216673%-0.01
nukeA116555%-0.02
dust2C52340%0.01
anubis31233%-0.03
cache110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 34). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

216Matches
50%Win rate
0.95Avg K/D
73.5ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage6444%0.9214.3
Inferno4262%1.1414.8
Ancient3956%0.9313.2
Dust22658%1.0012.6
Nuke1631%0.8212.7
Anubis1560%0.8913.7
Cache617%0.5210.2
Overpass617%0.9716.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
85.4%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
590msReaction time
26.0%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.54Enemies flashed / flash
3.0%Flash assists
9.39HE damage / grenade
8.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.6911% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9662% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 34 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.090%30 Aug
anubis16–140.0516%30 Aug
mirage13–40.038%29 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0316%29 Aug
inferno13–80.0414%29 Aug
nuke8–130.0115%29 Aug
mirage13–80.0717%29 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0720%29 Aug
mirage16–13-0.0010%28 Aug
mirage13–3-0.0420%28 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0613%28 Aug
inferno10–130.0117%26 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0617%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.067%26 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0110%25 Aug
mirage5–130.0418%25 Aug
inferno13–70.0816%25 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0816%25 Aug
ancient4–13-0.1021%23 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0416%23 Aug
dust215–15-0.0116%22 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0813%21 Aug
ancient13–8-0.0218%21 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0217%21 Aug
ancient10–13-0.057%21 Aug
dust213–50.0512%19 Aug
inferno13–30.0812%19 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0414%17 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0434%17 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0614%17 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0820%17 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0417%16 Aug
ancient11–13-0.0516%16 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0732%16 Aug
inferno10–130.0213%16 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0211%15 Aug
mirage4–130.007%15 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0612%15 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0416%13 Aug
mirage9–13-0.026%13 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0319%13 Aug
ancient5–13-0.045%13 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0313%11 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0619%11 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0314%11 Aug
inferno6–13-0.1210%10 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0615%10 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0611%9 Aug
nuke13–110.0513%9 Aug
ancient16–120.0113%6 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0018%6 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0413%5 Aug
ancient13–2-0.013%5 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0415%5 Aug
mirage10–13-0.032%5 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0124%2 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0112%2 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0318%2 Aug
dust211–13-0.0321%2 Aug
inferno13–11-0.036%2 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0311%1 Aug
nuke13–9-0.048%1 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0222%1 Aug
anubis11–13-0.1014%1 Aug
ancient3–10-0.0215%1 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0914%31 Jul
inferno13–80.0118%30 Jul
mirage13–50.037%30 Jul
ancient13–90.067%25 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0615%24 Jul
mirage13–12-0.0316%24 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0410%24 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0116%24 Jul
inferno13–100.0418%24 Jul
mirage7–13-0.0813%24 Jul
inferno1–7-0.080%24 Jul
ancient13–8-0.0710%24 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0412%24 Jul
ancient13–3-0.0128%23 Jul
dust216–140.0521%23 Jul
mirage13–90.0417%22 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0310%22 Jul
inferno13–10-0.039%22 Jul
mirage5–130.0220%22 Jul
mirage11–130.0218%22 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0116%22 Jul
ancient13–11-0.0110%21 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0217%21 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0720%21 Jul
dust210–130.0116%21 Jul
nuke13–110.057%21 Jul
inferno13–110.0820%21 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0717%21 Jul
inferno13–80.037%20 Jul
inferno13–90.039%20 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0616%16 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0015%16 Jul
mirage13–60.0114%16 Jul
cache13–90.0411%16 Jul
mirage9–13-0.039%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →