FuLLeR77 — CS2 Stats

76561198256864328[U:1:296598600]✓ No bans

897Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.9 Learning
Premier CS Rating13,134Blue band · top ~38.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#30474 of 46150 tracked
WingmanSilver IV
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFuLLeR77PREMIER13,134 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim42
Positioning41
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43525Last 10043%Win rateWLWLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.2
Aggression4.4
Utility5.7
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels1.3
Clutch1.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 51% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 640ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 70% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.2
Positioning4.1
Utility5.7
Mechanics4.4
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact2.8

Composite 3.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03−0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time639ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 628ms → last ⅓ avg 639ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+2.3%
first ⅓ avg 19.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — mirage 13–5
132Biggest win — mirage
4Longest win streak
86In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 52% over 27mirageWeakest map · 33% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB27141352%-0.03
mirageD2481633%-0.04
ancientC23101343%-0.02
nukeB168850%-0.03
overpass32167%0.00
anubis21150%-0.02
cache2020%-0.08
dust22020%-0.06
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

28Matches
32%Win rate
0.77Avg K/D
65.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2633%0.558.5
Inferno633%0.8612.8
Ancient650%0.6810.3
Mirage50%0.6811.0
Overpass20%1.1317.5
Nuke2100%1.4418.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
29.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.6%Spray accuracy
69.6%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
640msReaction time
20.0%T opening success
50.7%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.7%Flash assists
5.91HE damage / grenade
20.10Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 19.9999% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–40.0227%29 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0232%29 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0318%29 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0624%29 Aug
ancient11–130.0115%28 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0414%26 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1124%25 Aug
inferno13–7-0.1012%25 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0634%19 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0829%19 Aug
mirage13–20.1032%19 Aug
nuke13–8-0.0214%17 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0223%17 Aug
mirage1–13-0.1423%17 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0424%15 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0620%15 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0216%14 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0021%13 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0123%12 Aug
mirage4–13-0.129%12 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0021%7 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0023%6 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0523%5 Aug
ancient11–130.0020%4 Aug
inferno13–8-0.0335%2 Aug
ancient1–13-0.0620%2 Aug
mirage6–13-0.057%1 Aug
ancient13–9-0.0120%25 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0631%24 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0318%24 Jul
ancient13–90.0719%22 Jul
ancient6–13-0.0730%22 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0422%21 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0426%16 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0221%15 Jul
nuke12–16-0.0320%14 Jul
cache6–13-0.0519%14 Jul
nuke15–150.0220%14 Jul
mirage15–15-0.0217%13 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0415%13 Jul
inferno13–60.0124%12 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0321%12 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0023%11 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0219%9 Jul
inferno13–90.0321%9 Jul
vertigo6–13-0.0223%8 Jul
cache5–13-0.1018%8 Jul
ancient8–13-0.060%6 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0719%6 Jul
mirage16–14-0.0419%5 Jul
inferno10–130.0241%5 Jul
inferno15–15-0.0510%3 Jul
nuke3–13-0.0944%3 Jul
inferno6–130.0123%3 Jul
ancient13–7-0.0018%2 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0228%1 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0613%30 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0617%30 Jun
inferno15–15-0.0227%28 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0120%28 Jun
nuke13–7-0.0316%25 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0821%25 Jun
inferno6–13-0.0510%25 Jun
overpass0–13-0.0615%22 Jun
dust23–13-0.0621%22 Jun
inferno2–13-0.1114%22 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0919%20 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0727%20 Jun
overpass13–80.0220%20 Jun
dust25–13-0.078%19 Jun
inferno16–13-0.0317%18 Jun
nuke13–110.0622%18 Jun
ancient11–130.0214%17 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0114%11 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0610%11 Jun
overpass13–60.0531%10 Jun
ancient13–70.0520%10 Jun
mirage13–11-0.079%9 Jun
inferno10–130.0212%8 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0529%7 Jun
mirage13–50.1020%7 Jun
ancient16–13-0.0222%7 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0826%6 Jun
inferno10–13-0.0227%6 Jun
anubis13–8-0.0113%6 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0323%4 Jun
inferno3–130.0423%4 Jun
inferno13–30.0129%2 Jun
nuke13–9-0.0322%1 Jun
inferno13–6-0.0420%1 Jun
nuke13–11-0.0529%31 May
inferno4–13-0.129%31 May
ancient11–13-0.0116%29 May
ancient13–7-0.0617%28 May
ancient13–9-0.028%28 May
nuke5–13-0.0626%26 May
mirage7–13-0.0625%26 May
inferno13–60.0329%26 May
ancient13–9-0.0411%25 May
ancient8–13-0.0218%25 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →