TociDog — CS2 Stats

JP76561198334179214[U:1:373913486]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,204Tracked matches41%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating21,823Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#3909 of 11228 tracked

FaceitLevel 6 · 1,205 ELOTop 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim63

Positioning41

Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD45–43–12Last 10045%Win rateLLLWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.3

Aggression6.1

Utility5.7

Positioning4.1

Opening Duels1.2

Clutch6.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.3

Positioning4.1

Utility5.7

Mechanics6.9

Opening Duels1.2

Win Impact1.9

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.05

first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time578ms+16ms

first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms

Headshot accuracy18.2%−3.3%

first ⅓ avg 21.5% → last ⅓ avg 18.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — vertigo 12–12

13–1Biggest win — vertigo

9Longest win streak

L3Current streak

3–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 50% over 6nukeWeakest map · 33% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	31	14–17	45%	0.02
mirage	B	24	11–13	46%	0.03
inferno	C	12	5–7	42%	0.02
ancient	B	11	5–6	45%	0.02
nuke	D	6	2–4	33%	0.01
cache	B	6	3–3	50%	0.02
vertigo	C	5	2–3	40%	0.03
anubis	—	3	2–1	67%	-0.00
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

65Matches

55%Win rate

1.31Avg K/D

90.6ADR

48%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	21	57%	1.45	19.4
Dust2	20	50%	1.29	18.5
Inferno	8	38%	1.08	15.6
Nuke	5	60%	1.21	14.6
Ancient	5	80%	1.29	19.4
Overpass	4	50%	1.14	12.5
Train	1	100%	2.09	23.0
Vertigo	1	100%	1.00	11.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.6%Headshot accuracy

29.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

33.7%Spray accuracy

81.1%Counter-strafing

8.4°Preaim

604msReaction time

34.9%T opening success

34.8%CT opening success

0.46Enemies flashed / flash

5.0%Flash assists

10.41HE damage / grenade

14.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4561 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 34.872% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	14–16	0.01	14%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.02	16%	15 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.02	21%	15 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.10	27%	12 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.01	15%	9 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.00	18%	9 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.04	22%	9 Aug →
inferno	5–13	0.03	16%	9 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.09	26%	8 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.01	15%	2 Aug →
dust2	14–16	-0.02	8%	2 Aug →
nuke	16–14	-0.05	10%	2 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.02	21%	2 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.06	23%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	20%	31 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.02	20%	30 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	0.02	17%	30 Jul →
dust2	14–16	-0.07	22%	29 Jul →
cache	13–6	0.01	20%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–16	0.03	25%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.13	22%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.05	33%	25 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	32%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.00	10%	25 Jul →
inferno	0–2	-0.09	0%	24 Jul →
dust2	0–13	-0.04	0%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.02	22%	21 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	15%	21 Jul →
mirage	16–13	-0.03	14%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.07	13%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.09	17%	18 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.01	13%	18 Jul →
mirage	15–15	0.02	33%	18 Jul →
ancient	13–7	-0.01	24%	17 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.10	29%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.01	26%	17 Jul →
dust2	13–10	0.06	20%	17 Jul →
ancient	9–13	0.00	19%	17 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.04	14%	16 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.11	13%	16 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.03	38%	16 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.01	28%	15 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	24%	15 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.03	20%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	26%	14 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	30%	14 Jul →
dust2	13–6	0.01	13%	12 Jul →
mirage	16–12	0.05	21%	12 Jul →
cache	8–13	-0.02	15%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.11	38%	12 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.10	31%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–5	0.10	34%	11 Jul →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	26%	10 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.10	12%	8 Jul →
cache	12–12	0.03	17%	5 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.10	32%	5 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.03	17%	3 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.01	15%	3 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.02	23%	2 Jul →
overpass	13–4	0.03	19%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–3	0.17	19%	2 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.07	25%	1 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.03	17%	29 Jun →
inferno	13–7	-0.01	13%	29 Jun →
dust2	16–14	-0.02	15%	27 Jun →
overpass	8–13	0.06	23%	26 Jun →
ancient	13–3	0.01	18%	26 Jun →
nuke	6–13	0.08	13%	26 Jun →
cache	11–13	0.05	16%	25 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.06	18%	25 Jun →
inferno	5–13	0.01	13%	24 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.15	35%	24 Jun →
mirage	12–12	0.11	18%	23 Jun →
ancient	7–13	0.05	15%	23 Jun →
inferno	12–12	0.13	15%	22 Jun →
vertigo	12–12	0.17	14%	22 Jun →
mirage	7–13	0.12	20%	22 Jun →
nuke	4–13	0.03	32%	22 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.08	33%	22 Jun →
inferno	13–8	0.01	32%	21 Jun →
dust2	13–5	0.01	22%	18 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.00	22%	18 Jun →
inferno	12–12	0.04	19%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–3	0.10	25%	10 Jun →
vertigo	13–8	-0.02	56%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–9	-0.00	27%	9 Jun →
vertigo	13–1	0.02	25%	7 Jun →
dust2	4–13	0.02	30%	7 Jun →
mirage	15–15	0.00	15%	7 Jun →
nuke	10–13	0.09	14%	6 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.08	22%	6 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.07	13%	5 Jun →
ancient	11–13	0.01	17%	5 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.04	8%	4 Jun →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	17%	3 Jun →
dust2	11–13	0.04	21%	3 Jun →
dust2	10–13	0.02	27%	3 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.01	18%	2 Jun →
mirage	13–16	0.01	16%	2 Jun →
cache	13–7	-0.04	23%	30 May →