HIGH IQ PLAYS — CS2 Stats

CN76561198314321278[U:1:354055550]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,158Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.4 Developing

FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim45

Positioning42

Utility14

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateWWLWLWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim4.5

Aggression5.5

Utility1.4

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.5

Positioning4.2

Utility1.4

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels2.3

Win Impact7.9

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.05−0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.04 → last ⅓ avg -0.05

Reaction time667ms+11ms

first ⅓ avg 656ms → last ⅓ avg 667ms

Headshot accuracy9.5%−1.3%

first ⅓ avg 10.8% → last ⅓ avg 9.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating — mirage 13–6

13–1Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

5–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 58% over 33mirageWeakest map · 50% over 40

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	40	20–20	50%	-0.03
inferno	A	33	19–14	58%	-0.03
cache	B	20	10–10	50%	-0.05
dust2	—	3	1–2	33%	-0.05
anubis	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.09
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.12
ancient	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 40). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

270Matches

50%Win rate

0.89Avg K/D

—ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win

—1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	7	43%	0.86	13.9
Vertigo	3	33%	0.81	14.0
Inferno	3	67%	1.81	11.0
Ancient	2	100%	1.00	15.0
Anubis	1	100%	1.67	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.9%Headshot accuracy

31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.1%Spray accuracy

77.7%Counter-strafing

9.8°Preaim

659msReaction time

25.6%T opening success

48.7%CT opening success

0.25Enemies flashed / flash

2.3%Flash assists

3.67HE damage / grenade

1.50Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 9.859% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.2475 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 25.6308% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
dust2	13–6	-0.09	8%	11 Jul →
anubis	13–10	-0.09	6%	11 Jul →
dust2	3–13	0.00	10%	2 Jul →
mirage	13–6	-0.08	15%	28 Jun →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	18%	27 Jun →
vertigo	13–7	-0.12	7%	19 Jun →
mirage	4–13	-0.06	13%	27 May →
inferno	7–13	-0.06	10%	23 May →
mirage	4–13	-0.07	20%	23 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.05	11%	22 May →
cache	9–13	-0.04	11%	22 May →
cache	6–13	-0.08	3%	20 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.09	0%	20 May →
inferno	13–11	0.05	13%	19 May →
cache	13–8	-0.04	0%	19 May →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	12%	19 May →
cache	13–7	-0.03	0%	19 May →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	12%	14 May →
cache	8–13	-0.05	11%	14 May →
mirage	13–6	0.07	12%	12 May →
cache	13–8	-0.02	10%	12 May →
cache	7–13	-0.07	6%	11 May →
cache	5–13	-0.11	7%	10 May →
inferno	13–4	-0.01	13%	10 May →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	16%	9 May →
mirage	13–7	-0.04	8%	9 May →
inferno	13–3	0.01	11%	8 May →
cache	12–12	-0.06	14%	8 May →
mirage	13–4	-0.03	13%	8 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.02	8%	8 May →
cache	7–0	0.01	0%	8 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.08	11%	7 May →
inferno	4–13	-0.09	5%	7 May →
cache	13–8	0.01	16%	7 May →
mirage	6–8	-0.04	3%	6 May →
inferno	13–9	-0.02	11%	6 May →
cache	2–13	-0.10	25%	6 May →
inferno	12–12	-0.08	5%	6 May →
cache	13–9	-0.05	15%	6 May →
inferno	13–2	-0.02	11%	5 May →
cache	3–13	-0.03	8%	5 May →
cache	13–6	-0.04	9%	5 May →
mirage	13–11	0.04	18%	4 May →
cache	13–5	-0.03	8%	4 May →
inferno	12–12	-0.03	4%	30 Apr →
cache	5–13	-0.08	0%	30 Apr →
cache	13–1	-0.02	2%	30 Apr →
mirage	13–7	0.01	6%	29 Apr →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	22%	29 Apr →
cache	13–8	-0.04	13%	29 Apr →
cache	5–13	-0.07	21%	29 Apr →
inferno	13–10	-0.08	5%	28 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	5%	28 Apr →
inferno	6–13	0.03	11%	28 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.08	5%	24 Apr →
inferno	13–1	0.02	31%	24 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.02	23%	24 Apr →
inferno	13–5	-0.04	12%	24 Apr →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	11%	24 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.00	16%	23 Apr →
inferno	13–8	0.01	33%	23 Apr →
inferno	13–8	-0.03	8%	21 Apr →
mirage	7–2	-0.01	13%	21 Apr →
ancient	10–13	-0.08	5%	21 Apr →
mirage	11–3	0.00	0%	19 Apr →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	11%	19 Apr →
inferno	10–13	-0.05	11%	18 Apr →
mirage	8–13	-0.05	0%	18 Apr →
mirage	13–1	-0.05	12%	17 Apr →
inferno	13–6	0.01	10%	17 Apr →
mirage	13–5	-0.03	17%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.08	8%	16 Apr →
mirage	13–11	0.04	11%	15 Apr →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	5%	14 Apr →
inferno	7–13	-0.11	18%	14 Apr →
mirage	11–13	0.01	13%	13 Apr →
inferno	13–9	-0.03	9%	13 Apr →
office	12–12	-0.04	5%	11 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.09	0%	11 Apr →
mirage	13–9	-0.08	25%	11 Apr →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	0%	8 Apr →
inferno	6–13	-0.03	14%	8 Apr →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	13%	8 Apr →
inferno	1–5	-0.05	10%	8 Apr →
inferno	11–13	-0.03	11%	7 Apr →
mirage	3–7	-0.03	9%	7 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.09	6%	5 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	10%	2 Apr →
inferno	13–10	-0.04	8%	2 Apr →
inferno	13–10	-0.02	31%	31 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.03	10%	31 Mar →
mirage	6–13	-0.11	4%	30 Mar →
inferno	13–7	-0.02	33%	30 Mar →
inferno	13–10	-0.06	7%	29 Mar →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	9%	29 Mar →
mirage	13–2	-0.00	2%	28 Mar →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	11%	28 Mar →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	8%	27 Mar →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	20%	27 Mar →
mirage	7–13	-0.06	5%	27 Mar →