Hog Mama

Hog Mama — CS2 Stats

US76561198314038704[U:1:353772976]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,347Tracked matches44%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating7,658Light Blue band · top ~66.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#40227 of 53945 tracked
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHog MamaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER7,658 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim78
Positioning38
Utility22

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41554Last 10041%Win rateWLLLWTWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.8
Aggression2.3
Utility2.2
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-fight frequency; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 16% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 610ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.8
Positioning3.8
Utility2.2
Mechanics7.3
Opening Duels0.8
Win Impact3.1

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time606ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 605ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy17.2%+3.1%
first ⅓ avg 14.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — mirage 13–10
130Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
5Overtime games

Map breakdown

officeBest map · 100% over 6anubisWeakest map · 0% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeD2161529%-0.01
cacheC1771041%-0.01
dust2B168850%0.02
infernoC135838%-0.03
ancientD103730%-0.00
officeS660100%0.01
anubisD6060%-0.05
vertigo42250%-0.03
mirage21150%0.02
debris21150%-0.03
train1010%0.05
shelter110100%-0.06
eldorado110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

119Matches
45%Win rate
0.71Avg K/D
63.6ADR
34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust22433%0.6010.0
Nuke2241%0.6110.3
Mirage1856%0.8213.3
Inferno1833%0.6510.3
Anubis1765%0.8312.0
Ancient1560%0.8713.4
Train333%0.8516.0
Overpass20%0.478.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.2%Headshot accuracy
43.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
45.7%Spray accuracy
82.9%Counter-strafing
12.9°Preaim
610msReaction time
15.6%T opening success
36.5%CT opening success
0.20Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
12.43HE damage / grenade
0.55Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.8633° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2001 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–30.0214%28 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0515%28 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0114%28 Aug
ancient9–130.0419%28 Aug
dust213–80.0214%28 Aug
nuke15–15-0.0111%27 Aug
office13–110.005%26 Aug
vertigo10–13-0.0215%26 Aug
ancient13–10.0522%26 Aug
anubis5–130.0017%26 Aug
cache11–13-0.0127%26 Aug
cache13–1-0.0225%26 Aug
ancient12–12-0.088%26 Aug
nuke7–130.0024%26 Aug
nuke13–50.049%25 Aug
inferno9–60.0410%25 Aug
cache13–9-0.0215%25 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0915%25 Aug
ancient8–130.0313%25 Aug
cache13–80.0410%25 Aug
inferno8–80.1020%24 Aug
vertigo4–9-0.0412%24 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0327%24 Aug
cache4–13-0.0514%24 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0316%24 Aug
cache13–7-0.0014%24 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0517%24 Aug
office13–8-0.0422%24 Aug
ancient16–14-0.0230%23 Aug
dust23–130.0938%22 Aug
dust213–00.0125%22 Aug
anubis5–13-0.1014%22 Aug
cache15–150.0016%22 Aug
nuke4–9-0.0920%22 Aug
train11–130.0528%22 Aug
office13–110.0437%22 Aug
nuke3–13-0.039%22 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0017%22 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0628%22 Aug
nuke13–10-0.009%21 Aug
dust211–130.0320%21 Aug
vertigo9–6-0.0725%21 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0431%21 Aug
anubis3–13-0.063%21 Aug
dust24–13-0.0129%21 Aug
mirage13–100.1318%21 Aug
cache12–20.0921%21 Aug
office13–4-0.0218%21 Aug
cache14–16-0.0427%21 Aug
cache8–13-0.0512%21 Aug
shelter13–9-0.0628%20 Aug
nuke7–90.0333%20 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0218%20 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0821%19 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0633%19 Aug
cache9–13-0.0116%19 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0825%19 Aug
office13–30.0418%19 Aug
office13–110.0219%19 Aug
dust21–130.0416%19 Aug
dust210–20.0814%18 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0018%18 Aug
eldorado9–20.0429%18 Aug
debris9–4-0.0213%18 Aug
dust213–10-0.0420%18 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0521%18 Aug
vertigo13–7-0.0119%18 Aug
cache7–130.014%18 Aug
debris6–9-0.0414%18 Aug
anubis9–13-0.056%17 Aug
nuke13–50.0212%17 Aug
cache13–2-0.068%17 Aug
inferno7–13-0.025%17 Aug
dust26–130.0125%17 Aug
dust212–16-0.0721%17 Aug
mirage4–13-0.098%16 Aug
cache6–130.029%16 Aug
dust22–13-0.0221%16 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0712%16 Aug
inferno13–11-0.025%16 Aug
nuke8–130.0411%16 Aug
ancient9–130.0219%16 Aug
dust213–80.0516%15 Aug
cache6–13-0.0038%15 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0021%15 Aug
inferno7–9-0.0921%15 Aug
nuke13–7-0.038%14 Aug
nuke13–10-0.0423%14 Aug
dust213–50.0820%14 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0615%14 Aug
cache6–13-0.070%14 Aug
dust213–100.0217%14 Aug
dust24–13-0.094%13 Aug
ancient13–11-0.009%13 Aug
nuke4–130.1015%12 Aug
inferno13–80.0318%12 Aug
inferno5–9-0.1325%12 Aug
ancient7–130.036%12 Aug
nuke13–40.0314%12 Aug
dust213–10.0615%12 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →