toothbrush

toothbrush — CS2 Stats

AU76561198312389723[U:1:352123995]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,596Tracked matches47%Win rate2025Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGtoothbrushFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning57
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48475Last 10048%Win rateLLLLLWLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.3
Aggression8.9
Utility3.6
Positioning5.7
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 54% on CT to 37% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 617ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning5.7
Utility3.6
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels3.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time614ms+51ms
first ⅓ avg 563ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy23.4%+4.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 23.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 13–5
132Biggest win — dust2
5Longest win streak
L5Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 56% over 34infernoWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA34191556%0.03
dust2B26131350%0.02
anubisD134931%0.02
ancientB126650%0.03
infernoD61517%-0.04
nukeC52340%0.04
overpass43175%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

17Matches
29%Win rate
0.60Avg K/D
56.8ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage617%0.509.2
Dust2520%0.6313.4
Ancient20%0.5312.0
Anubis2100%0.9212.0
Inferno1100%0.6210.0
Nuke10%0.6312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
86.1%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
617msReaction time
36.7%T opening success
53.9%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
5.28HE damage / grenade
4.11Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4561 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.6551% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust23–13-0.0928%5 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0913%30 Jun
dust210–13-0.037%18 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0332%8 May
nuke5–13-0.0417%27 Apr
mirage13–90.0220%26 Apr
mirage7–130.0827%26 Apr
anubis13–50.0815%25 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0424%25 Apr
mirage9–130.0530%24 Apr
inferno6–13-0.1150%21 Apr
ancient16–14-0.0119%21 Apr
dust213–8-0.0224%21 Apr
mirage13–80.0214%20 Apr
mirage7–130.0826%20 Apr
ancient6–13-0.0413%20 Apr
dust213–80.0527%20 Apr
ancient13–40.1326%20 Apr
inferno4–13-0.0018%20 Apr
mirage13–70.1225%20 Apr
mirage13–30.0122%20 Apr
overpass13–90.0411%19 Apr
anubis3–130.0420%19 Apr
nuke10–130.0624%19 Apr
mirage9–130.0428%19 Apr
anubis6–130.0426%19 Apr
inferno13–9-0.0153%18 Apr
anubis13–70.0418%18 Apr
dust213–20.0624%18 Apr
dust213–90.0121%17 Apr
mirage13–40.1219%17 Apr
anubis7–13-0.0426%17 Apr
mirage13–90.0525%17 Apr
mirage12–16-0.009%16 Apr
overpass13–110.1416%16 Apr
ancient13–60.0831%16 Apr
dust213–160.1021%15 Apr
mirage8–130.0015%15 Apr
ancient15–150.1220%15 Apr
dust213–90.0321%15 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0326%15 Apr
dust28–13-0.0426%15 Apr
dust213–90.0515%15 Apr
mirage13–110.0518%15 Apr
dust215–150.0323%15 Apr
ancient13–70.1020%15 Apr
mirage13–20.0414%14 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0422%14 Apr
mirage14–160.0323%14 Apr
ancient4–13-0.0523%14 Apr
dust24–13-0.0617%14 Apr
dust213–20.0922%14 Apr
mirage15–15-0.0112%13 Apr
dust213–20.0924%13 Apr
dust213–70.1925%13 Apr
dust213–9-0.032%13 Apr
overpass12–120.0216%13 Apr
nuke13–70.1928%13 Apr
anubis16–120.0322%12 Apr
inferno14–16-0.0414%12 Apr
dust213–60.0026%12 Apr
dust210–130.0629%12 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0526%11 Apr
mirage13–50.2022%10 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0024%10 Apr
ancient9–13-0.0820%10 Apr
dust26–130.0118%8 Apr
dust24–130.054%8 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0813%7 Apr
dust29–13-0.0710%7 Apr
mirage10–13-0.0010%7 Apr
dust212–12-0.044%7 Apr
ancient3–130.0211%6 Apr
anubis10–13-0.065%6 Apr
nuke13–90.0720%6 Apr
overpass13–30.1028%6 Apr
inferno8–13-0.050%2 Apr
anubis7–130.0321%2 Apr
mirage16–140.0120%2 Apr
mirage13–30.0313%2 Apr
mirage14–16-0.0218%1 Apr
ancient13–100.0315%1 Apr
dust213–30.0820%1 Apr
dust213–100.0820%1 Apr
mirage10–130.0522%1 Apr
anubis8–130.0518%1 Apr
mirage13–20.0127%1 Apr
mirage11–130.0319%1 Apr
dust25–13-0.0429%1 Apr
mirage13–70.1027%1 Apr
dust25–13-0.0518%31 Mar
anubis13–100.0623%31 Mar
anubis14–160.0020%31 Mar
mirage13–70.0119%31 Mar
mirage13–100.1022%31 Mar
ancient1–13-0.0738%31 Mar
mirage13–50.0333%31 Mar
mirage13–60.0328%31 Mar
mirage9–130.1032%31 Mar
ancient10–10.1118%31 Mar

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →