℮

— CS2 Stats

76561198311141848[U:1:350876120]Steam profile ↗

1,127Tracked matches55%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,416Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#3546 of 14184 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER23,416 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim82
Positioning37
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51463Last 10051%Win rateWWLLWTLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.2
Aggression4.4
Utility2.7
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels0.9
Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 45 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.2
Positioning3.7
Utility2.7
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact6.7

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.04
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time520ms−50ms
first ⅓ avg 570ms → last ⅓ avg 520ms
Headshot accuracy23.6%−0.9%
first ⅓ avg 24.5% → last ⅓ avg 23.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — mirage 13–11
132Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
79In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 78% over 9nukeWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB26131350%0.01
dust2B22101245%0.01
infernoA138562%-0.00
ancientA127558%-0.00
nukeD113827%0.00
cacheS97278%0.01
anubisD62433%0.00
train110100%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

177Matches
58%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
78.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5461%1.2115.7
Dust22662%1.3217.5
Ancient1963%1.2415.9
Inferno1958%1.2315.9
Anubis1547%1.0814.1
Nuke1450%1.1617.4
Vertigo933%1.1112.4
Train450%1.4118.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.8%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.0%Spray accuracy
79.5%Counter-strafing
8.0°Preaim
510msReaction time
21.7%T opening success
45.5%CT opening success
0.36Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
6.82HE damage / grenade
4.05Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3596 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.7046% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–6-0.0320%28 Aug
cache13–60.1031%28 Aug
mirage6–13-0.1127%28 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0527%28 Aug
cache13–80.0126%28 Aug
cache15–15-0.0524%27 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0013%27 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0022%27 Aug
dust26–13-0.0031%27 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0324%27 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0218%27 Aug
mirage13–110.0429%27 Aug
anubis13–60.0320%26 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0023%26 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0322%26 Aug
inferno13–7-0.0414%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0122%26 Aug
inferno3–13-0.1037%24 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0418%24 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0022%24 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0221%24 Aug
ancient13–7-0.0225%24 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0634%24 Aug
cache13–8-0.0238%24 Aug
dust20–6-0.100%24 Aug
anubis13–16-0.0314%24 Aug
dust213–40.0638%24 Aug
ancient13–100.0120%24 Aug
ancient13–100.0123%23 Aug
mirage13–4-0.0022%23 Aug
mirage13–20.0222%23 Aug
dust213–10-0.0220%23 Aug
dust213–8-0.0630%23 Aug
dust213–60.0313%23 Aug
dust210–130.0115%22 Aug
mirage0–13-0.0426%22 Aug
mirage4–130.0647%20 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0132%20 Aug
mirage13–110.2023%20 Aug
inferno11–130.0415%20 Aug
cache13–80.1030%20 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0329%20 Aug
mirage8–130.0924%20 Aug
nuke7–130.0124%20 Aug
anubis14–160.0223%20 Aug
ancient13–70.0216%20 Aug
dust22–13-0.0730%20 Aug
cache13–60.0328%20 Aug
train13–70.0425%13 Aug
nuke5–130.0333%13 Aug
nuke13–70.0318%10 Aug
dust210–13-0.0320%10 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0214%9 Aug
inferno13–40.0135%9 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0523%9 Aug
dust215–15-0.0317%9 Aug
inferno13–60.0525%9 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0113%9 Aug
cache13–7-0.0631%9 Aug
mirage16–12-0.0312%9 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0440%8 Aug
anubis13–60.0523%8 Aug
ancient16–130.0321%8 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0223%5 Aug
ancient13–60.0319%5 Aug
mirage5–130.0223%5 Aug
inferno13–50.0723%4 Aug
dust21–80.0245%4 Aug
dust213–110.1020%30 Jul
dust213–100.0826%30 Jul
nuke8–130.0519%30 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0333%29 Jul
nuke9–130.0431%27 Jul
nuke13–7-0.0221%27 Jul
dust213–70.0221%27 Jul
mirage6–130.1225%16 Jul
cache11–13-0.0223%15 Jul
nuke13–110.0523%15 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0123%15 Jul
mirage13–110.0329%14 Jul
anubis14–16-0.0319%14 Jul
dust25–130.0326%14 Jul
ancient11–130.0220%14 Jul
nuke0–13-0.075%14 Jul
dust213–70.1031%14 Jul
inferno13–30.0528%14 Jul
nuke14–16-0.0129%14 Jul
inferno8–130.0026%14 Jul
mirage11–130.0132%14 Jul
mirage13–110.0126%13 Jul
dust211–130.0416%13 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0222%13 Jul
inferno13–8-0.0022%13 Jul
dust215–15-0.0223%13 Jul
dust213–80.0421%13 Jul
dust216–140.0421%13 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0518%13 Jul
dust213–16-0.0231%13 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0024%13 Jul
mirage13–70.0229%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →