Aloof64 — CS2 Stats

76561198309113598[U:1:348847870]

3,063Tracked matches47%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidAggressive Rifler
FaceitLevel 10 · 1,879 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAloof64FACEITLevel 10 · 1,879 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning51
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY5347Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.6
Aggression6.7
Utility7.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.1
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.1
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time570ms−17ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 570ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 19.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.08Best rating — inferno 13–5
132Biggest win — ancient
5Longest win streak
1010In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 19dust2Weakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisB23121152%0.00
ancientA1912763%-0.01
infernoA1710759%0.00
mirageB136746%-0.01
dust2D103730%-0.03
nukeC94544%-0.02
overpassA53260%-0.03
cache43175%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,761Matches
51%Win rate
1.01Avg K/D
75.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage46151%0.9914.4
Anubis38652%1.0614.9
Inferno37551%1.0314.8
Ancient34349%0.9314.7
Nuke20353%1.0415.8
Vertigo18950%0.9514.0
Dust215846%0.8513.2
Overpass9248%0.9814.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.0%Headshot accuracy
34.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
8.4°Preaim
575msReaction time
25.0%T opening success
52.0%CT opening success
0.66Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
12.65HE damage / grenade
9.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.02% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis1–13-0.0614%27 Jun
anubis13–80.0518%16 Jun
ancient13–90.0318%16 Jun
inferno13–50.0828%16 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0413%16 Jun
dust29–13-0.0229%16 Jun
inferno13–70.0016%16 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0512%13 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0713%11 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0215%7 Jun
ancient6–13-0.089%3 Jun
inferno13–50.0541%31 May
dust211–13-0.0330%29 May
mirage9–13-0.0523%29 May
dust23–13-0.0617%29 May
anubis13–60.0619%28 May
anubis10–13-0.0316%26 May
ancient13–8-0.0624%25 May
anubis19–160.0318%23 May
ancient13–90.0822%23 May
ancient10–13-0.0510%23 May
ancient8–13-0.0115%22 May
anubis16–140.0026%22 May
mirage13–11-0.046%22 May
ancient9–13-0.1018%22 May
anubis9–13-0.0218%21 May
anubis3–13-0.0336%20 May
nuke13–6-0.0313%20 May
anubis16–12-0.0022%20 May
cache13–70.0213%13 May
overpass6–13-0.103%13 May
anubis13–90.0313%13 May
nuke13–16-0.0229%12 May
ancient13–100.0419%6 May
cache13–110.0324%2 May
ancient13–10-0.0125%2 May
mirage10–130.0717%30 Apr
cache14–16-0.0532%29 Apr
cache13–60.0121%28 Apr
inferno13–80.0220%27 Apr
inferno13–80.0120%26 Apr
inferno13–30.0844%25 Apr
ancient13–2-0.0521%24 Apr
inferno7–13-0.068%23 Apr
ancient13–11-0.0220%23 Apr
anubis8–13-0.0325%23 Apr
overpass9–13-0.048%19 Apr
nuke13–100.0213%19 Apr
anubis5–13-0.0318%19 Apr
inferno13–8-0.0319%17 Apr
ancient13–6-0.0018%16 Apr
anubis3–13-0.0225%14 Apr
anubis13–100.0517%12 Apr
dust213–5-0.0214%11 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0529%11 Apr
inferno13–110.0828%11 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0513%11 Apr
mirage13–90.0414%10 Apr
anubis6–130.0423%5 Apr
ancient13–40.0039%5 Apr
anubis13–30.0415%5 Apr
anubis16–140.0216%4 Apr
nuke13–9-0.0415%4 Apr
dust25–13-0.0524%4 Apr
ancient13–4-0.0019%1 Apr
ancient9–130.0113%31 Mar
anubis13–70.0232%31 Mar
mirage14–16-0.0210%30 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0229%30 Mar
nuke17–19-0.0626%23 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0618%22 Mar
anubis11–13-0.0517%21 Mar
inferno8–13-0.0426%21 Mar
dust24–13-0.0219%18 Mar
anubis13–30.0512%15 Mar
anubis6–13-0.049%14 Mar
ancient13–80.0525%11 Mar
nuke11–130.0320%11 Mar
inferno2–13-0.0126%10 Mar
overpass13–7-0.0415%7 Mar
inferno13–3-0.0123%7 Mar
mirage6–13-0.0627%25 Feb
anubis9–13-0.016%22 Feb
overpass13–11-0.0212%22 Feb
ancient13–16-0.0220%21 Feb
mirage8–130.0020%21 Feb
dust216–14-0.0516%15 Feb
ancient13–60.0525%15 Feb
anubis13–110.0218%8 Feb
dust213–11-0.018%7 Feb
inferno13–8-0.0013%4 Feb
dust29–13-0.0218%4 Feb
nuke13–60.0025%17 Nov
mirage13–100.0620%15 Nov
mirage13–2-0.0527%15 Nov
mirage13–5-0.0016%15 Nov
dust211–13-0.0012%10 Nov
overpass13–60.0115%9 Nov
mirage13–9-0.0033%17 Oct
inferno14–160.0229%17 Oct

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →