TASTE THE RAINBOW — CS2 Stats

76561198304730941[U:1:344465213]

1,412Tracked matches48%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 4 · 1,005 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTASTE THE RAINBOWFACEITLevel 4 · 1,005 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning40
Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT483814Last 10048%Win rateTLWWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression6.1
Utility5.1
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch0.0

Excellent counter-strafingStrong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 39 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 634ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.0
Utility5.1
Mechanics8.8
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact4.3

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time631ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 665ms → last ⅓ avg 631ms
Headshot accuracy26.4%−2.8%
first ⅓ avg 29.2% → last ⅓ avg 26.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — dust2 6–0
131Biggest win — mirage
8Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 65% over 20dust2Weakest map · 43% over 70
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C70304043%0.01
cacheS2013765%0.03
nukeC73443%-0.01
boulder1010%-0.00
train110100%-0.06
mirage110100%0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 70). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

21Matches
48%Win rate
1.18Avg K/D
82.0ADR
60%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win
60%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage450%0.8614.0
Dust2367%2.1319.3
Inferno367%0.9918.7
Ancient250%1.3017.0
Vertigo10%0.7710.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
32.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.8%Spray accuracy
89.5%Counter-strafing
8.5°Preaim
634msReaction time
32.1%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
6.3%Flash assists
9.98HE damage / grenade
9.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.0764% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 70 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust212–12-0.0623%27 Aug
dust27–13-0.0630%21 Aug
dust213–10-0.0123%16 Aug
dust213–9-0.029%6 Aug
dust213–70.0529%27 Jul
dust213–40.0416%25 Jul
dust213–50.0614%20 Jul
dust211–130.0633%19 Jul
dust213–10-0.0514%19 Jul
dust213–30.0524%18 Jul
dust211–130.0519%17 Jul
dust213–10-0.0520%17 Jul
nuke10–13-0.0122%16 Jul
dust22–13-0.0538%15 Jul
dust210–130.0312%15 Jul
cache13–5-0.0418%14 Jul
dust212–120.0725%14 Jul
dust212–120.0327%14 Jul
dust213–60.0822%13 Jul
dust213–50.0538%13 Jul
dust28–13-0.0525%12 Jul
dust210–13-0.0321%12 Jul
dust213–80.0536%11 Jul
dust212–12-0.0432%10 Jul
boulder12–12-0.0037%9 Jul
dust28–13-0.0640%8 Jul
dust21–70.0060%7 Jul
dust29–13-0.0248%5 Jul
dust210–13-0.0427%3 Jul
dust28–13-0.0318%2 Jul
dust213–5-0.0121%1 Jul
dust213–11-0.0219%1 Jul
dust211–130.0431%29 Jun
dust26–130.0217%28 Jun
dust22–13-0.0738%27 Jun
dust212–120.0427%26 Jun
dust213–3-0.0050%26 Jun
dust24–130.0533%23 Jun
dust210–130.0337%22 Jun
dust26–130.0419%21 Jun
dust213–40.0541%18 Jun
dust210–130.0922%16 Jun
dust27–130.0230%15 Jun
dust213–90.0330%14 Jun
dust26–13-0.0420%13 Jun
dust213–60.0511%10 Jun
dust213–80.1517%9 Jun
dust213–40.0723%9 Jun
dust212–12-0.0014%8 Jun
dust211–13-0.0328%7 Jun
dust211–13-0.0630%3 Jun
dust29–13-0.0824%21 May
dust27–13-0.0430%17 May
dust211–13-0.0135%16 May
dust24–13-0.0524%14 May
train13–8-0.0611%11 May
dust213–6-0.0525%11 May
dust213–110.0232%11 May
nuke13–9-0.0223%10 May
cache12–120.0233%10 May
dust26–00.1820%10 May
dust213–8-0.0736%10 May
dust213–9-0.0123%10 May
cache12–120.0632%9 May
dust28–130.0525%9 May
dust212–12-0.0227%9 May
dust213–70.1049%8 May
cache13–60.0416%8 May
dust27–130.0440%7 May
dust28–13-0.0231%7 May
nuke13–5-0.0517%7 May
cache10–13-0.0728%6 May
mirage13–10.0956%6 May
dust213–100.1128%6 May
dust26–13-0.0228%6 May
cache12–120.0736%6 May
dust213–60.0150%6 May
dust213–8-0.0231%6 May
nuke12–120.0219%6 May
cache13–100.0429%6 May
dust20–13-0.0119%5 May
dust213–90.0330%5 May
cache13–110.0340%5 May
cache13–1-0.0031%4 May
cache9–13-0.0235%3 May
dust212–120.0625%2 May
nuke9–130.0813%2 May
cache13–30.0340%2 May
dust213–40.0129%1 May
cache13–10.1145%1 May
cache13–11-0.0227%1 May
cache13–100.1437%30 Apr
cache13–90.1332%30 Apr
nuke13–2-0.0623%30 Apr
cache10–20.0622%30 Apr
cache3–13-0.0516%30 Apr
cache13–110.0239%30 Apr
cache5–13-0.0318%30 Apr
nuke12–12-0.0217%29 Apr
cache13–60.0318%29 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →