Enzo Gorlami — CS2 Stats

VE76561198300687874[U:1:340422146]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,088Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating14,889Blue band · top ~29% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#33600 of 55124 tracked

FaceitLevel 8 · 1,592 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72

Positioning54

Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–44–8Last 10048%Win rateLWLWLWTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2

Aggression6.8

Utility4.6

Positioning5.4

Opening Duels3.0

Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2

Positioning5.4

Utility4.6

Mechanics6.5

Opening Duels3.0

Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time547ms−112ms

first ⅓ avg 659ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms

Headshot accuracy17.6%−5.5%

first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 17.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.30Best rating — vertigo 9–2

13–1Biggest win — mirage

5Longest win streak

7–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

5Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 80% over 10dust2Weakest map · 38% over 16

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	22	11–11	50%	-0.00
dust2	C	16	6–10	38%	-0.01
inferno	B	13	6–7	46%	0.01
cache	A	10	6–4	60%	-0.02
anubis	C	10	4–6	40%	-0.02
nuke	S	10	8–2	80%	-0.00
train	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
vertigo	—	4	2–2	50%	0.02
eldorado	—	2	1–1	50%	-0.05
ancient	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.00
italy	—	2	1–1	50%	0.02
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.08
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02
poseidon	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

447Matches

50%Win rate

1.04Avg K/D

77.3ADR

47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win

19%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	155	52%	1.04	14.9
Dust2	96	52%	1.06	15.4
Nuke	58	52%	1.08	15.0
Inferno	42	50%	1.07	14.8
Ancient	33	45%	0.99	13.9
Anubis	27	41%	0.98	15.7
Cache	16	50%	1.00	18.2
Overpass	11	36%	0.82	12.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.7%Headshot accuracy

33.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

37.3%Spray accuracy

79.2%Counter-strafing

8.9°Preaim

548msReaction time

47.8%T opening success

36.5%CT opening success

0.40Enemies flashed / flash

3.5%Flash assists

4.81HE damage / grenade

7.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4029 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.
CT opening duels 36.5018% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	10–13	0.08	19%	30 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.04	11%	30 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.00	19%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.00	11%	30 Aug →
inferno	13–16	-0.03	9%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.03	11%	27 Aug →
eldorado	8–8	0.04	29%	27 Aug →
debris	4–9	-0.08	12%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–10	0.02	14%	27 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.01	15%	26 Aug →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	14%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.05	5%	26 Aug →
nuke	19–17	-0.09	13%	25 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.06	15%	25 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	5%	25 Aug →
inferno	5–13	-0.00	25%	25 Aug →
mirage	17–19	-0.04	13%	24 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.03	13%	24 Aug →
dust2	1–13	-0.08	20%	22 Aug →
nuke	12–1	0.07	44%	22 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.02	17%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.11	23%	22 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.06	23%	21 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.05	20%	21 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	32%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.06	15%	21 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.03	20%	21 Aug →
cache	7–13	-0.11	18%	21 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.05	15%	20 Aug →
inferno	13–9	0.09	19%	20 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.05	21%	20 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	32%	19 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.05	13%	19 Aug →
italy	13–4	0.02	27%	19 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.04	22%	18 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	6%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	21%	17 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.01	20%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.04	23%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.00	20%	17 Aug →
nuke	25–23	-0.00	13%	16 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	36%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	25%	16 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.03	19%	16 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.02	14%	16 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.04	16%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.00	13%	16 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.00	23%	15 Aug →
vertigo	9–2	0.30	26%	15 Aug →
nuke	9–1	0.18	23%	15 Aug →
inferno	8–8	0.11	26%	15 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	15%	14 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.03	21%	14 Aug →
train	12–12	0.00	13%	13 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.00	21%	13 Aug →
vertigo	13–2	-0.01	32%	13 Aug →
mirage	0–13	-0.08	29%	13 Aug →
train	13–3	0.09	14%	13 Aug →
fachwerk	12–12	-0.03	16%	13 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	27%	12 Aug →
train	7–13	-0.06	13%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.00	17%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.05	21%	12 Aug →
train	2–13	-0.06	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.06	16%	11 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.06	23%	9 Aug →
anubis	12–12	0.02	17%	9 Aug →
dust2	12–12	-0.01	23%	9 Aug →
cache	13–11	-0.08	23%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.04	50%	6 Aug →
inferno	13–4	0.04	21%	4 Aug →
italy	9–13	0.02	20%	4 Aug →
train	13–6	0.06	27%	4 Aug →
vertigo	12–12	-0.07	13%	2 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.02	43%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–4	-0.01	8%	2 Aug →
mirage	6–13	-0.01	15%	25 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.04	20%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–8	-0.06	10%	25 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	14%	25 Jul →
overpass	13–10	-0.02	26%	25 Jul →
mirage	13–1	0.07	12%	25 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.05	17%	25 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	13%	19 Jul →
nuke	13–3	-0.04	3%	19 Jul →
mirage	8–13	0.06	19%	19 Jul →
eldorado	9–7	-0.14	17%	19 Jul →
vertigo	2–9	-0.14	100%	19 Jul →
nuke	8–8	-0.04	18%	19 Jul →
inferno	3–9	-0.12	25%	19 Jul →
poseidon	6–9	-0.04	44%	19 Jul →
dust2	16–14	-0.05	15%	14 Jul →
inferno	13–7	-0.05	20%	12 Jul →
anubis	10–13	-0.09	19%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.03	21%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–7	-0.01	24%	7 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	17%	7 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.06	9%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.01	33%	30 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.02	23%	30 Jun →