DrMonkeyMan — CS2 Stats

76561198300135322[U:1:339869594]✓ No bans

1,474Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating14,636Blue band · top ~30.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#24978 of 39874 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDrMonkeyManPREMIER14,636 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning41
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46513Last 10046%Win rateLWWWLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.3
Aggression3.7
Utility2.7
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 77% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 42 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 38% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.1
Utility2.7
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels1.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time541ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 560ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy29.5%+8.0%
first ⅓ avg 21.4% → last ⅓ avg 29.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.24Best rating — dust2 13–3
131Biggest win — ancient
4Longest win streak
713In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 56% over 27anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC31131842%0.01
dust2A27151256%0.01
infernoC114736%-0.03
cacheA95456%0.03
ancientC94544%0.01
anubisD71614%0.01
overpass42250%0.01
nuke220100%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.6%Headshot accuracy
33.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.6%Spray accuracy
86.9%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
534msReaction time
22.0%T opening success
37.9%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
5.4%Flash assists
9.70HE damage / grenade
1.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4113 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.9849% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage9–13-0.0532%30 Aug
dust213–110.0142%29 Aug
anubis13–60.1030%29 Aug
nuke13–100.1243%29 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0544%29 Aug
cache6–130.0237%29 Aug
mirage9–130.0241%29 Aug
mirage11–13-0.025%29 Aug
cache13–30.1221%27 Aug
cache11–13-0.0316%27 Aug
dust213–30.2421%27 Aug
anubis5–130.0131%26 Aug
dust213–40.0145%26 Aug
mirage9–130.0218%26 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0432%26 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0519%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0018%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0331%25 Aug
mirage7–130.0633%24 Aug
dust213–20.0333%24 Aug
cache13–70.0643%24 Aug
cache13–50.0435%23 Aug
mirage11–13-0.028%23 Aug
mirage13–7-0.0056%23 Aug
mirage7–130.0131%23 Aug
nuke16–130.0234%23 Aug
mirage13–20.1521%22 Aug
dust213–90.0013%22 Aug
cache13–4-0.0325%22 Aug
cache13–160.0131%22 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0628%22 Aug
dust210–13-0.0811%22 Aug
inferno13–100.0143%22 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0524%21 Aug
dust213–9-0.0623%21 Aug
mirage5–13-0.1010%20 Aug
dust213–160.0223%20 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0028%20 Aug
inferno13–3-0.0114%16 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0342%16 Aug
dust211–13-0.0122%15 Aug
dust213–10-0.0517%15 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0624%15 Aug
ancient13–80.0422%15 Aug
anubis6–13-0.1025%6 Aug
dust211–130.0524%4 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0823%4 Aug
cache13–60.0939%4 Aug
dust211–130.0238%4 Aug
dust26–50.1741%4 Aug
dust213–16-0.0525%4 Aug
dust213–70.0029%4 Aug
anubis7–130.0312%25 Jul
dust213–7-0.0113%25 Jul
mirage13–20.0753%25 Jul
ancient13–10.0819%25 Jul
anubis6–130.0619%13 Jul
cache7–13-0.0324%12 Jul
dust215–150.0115%11 Jul
mirage13–60.0132%11 Jul
anubis3–13-0.0219%11 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0527%11 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0221%10 Jul
dust213–7-0.0217%10 Jul
dust24–13-0.0622%6 Jul
dust213–50.0430%6 Jul
mirage13–160.0524%4 Jul
mirage13–50.0420%3 Jul
dust213–100.0111%3 Jul
mirage13–90.0522%3 Jul
inferno14–16-0.0525%2 Jul
dust213–90.0723%2 Jul
overpass11–130.0125%2 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0228%2 Jul
ancient13–110.0713%2 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0431%2 Jul
inferno10–130.0027%1 Jul
mirage12–120.0621%28 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0817%28 Jun
ancient9–13-0.0317%27 Jun
inferno14–16-0.0626%27 Jun
ancient13–50.0236%27 Jun
mirage13–100.0814%26 Jun
mirage14–160.0225%26 Jun
dust215–15-0.0119%25 Jun
overpass13–110.0712%25 Jun
mirage13–70.0116%25 Jun
overpass5–13-0.0514%24 Jun
mirage7–130.0110%23 Jun
mirage6–130.0024%23 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0219%23 Jun
ancient14–16-0.0121%23 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0427%21 Jun
inferno13–90.016%21 Jun
dust213–11-0.0122%21 Jun
mirage13–20.0329%21 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0035%21 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0123%21 Jun
mirage13–50.1029%21 Jun
dust213–110.0421%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →