GAO YELLOW

GAO YELLOW — CS2 Stats

VN76561198299750420[U:1:339484692]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

293Tracked matches33%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,498Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#14079 of 46031 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGAO YELLOWPREMIER21,498 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning56
Utility75

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD21754Last 10021%Win rateLLLWWWTLTL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.8
Aggression7.3
Utility7.5
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch0.0

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 96% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 75 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 58% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning5.6
Utility7.5
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time541ms−102ms
first ⅓ avg 643ms → last ⅓ avg 541ms
Headshot accuracy20.0%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 20.7% → last ⅓ avg 20.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.15Best rating — mirage 13–9
131Biggest win — mirage
3Longest win streak
L3Current streak
48In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 30% over 27anubisWeakest map · 11% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageD3082227%0.01
infernoD2781930%0.01
ancientD2532212%0.02
anubisD91811%0.01
dust2D81713%0.01
overpass1010%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches
38%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
82.3ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21100%1.008.0
Anubis10%1.1919.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.6%Headshot accuracy
40.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
540msReaction time
21.8%T opening success
58.1%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
12.2%Flash assists
12.33HE damage / grenade
14.61Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.8032% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient11–130.0616%27 Aug
inferno7–130.0118%27 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0515%27 Aug
mirage13–20.0131%27 Aug
mirage13–70.0623%25 Aug
inferno13–60.0325%25 Aug
dust212–12-0.0133%25 Aug
dust22–13-0.1211%23 Aug
inferno12–120.0629%23 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0219%22 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0138%22 Aug
inferno13–90.0926%22 Aug
ancient13–30.0612%22 Aug
inferno13–80.0423%19 Aug
ancient6–130.0113%19 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0023%19 Aug
ancient9–130.0214%18 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0213%18 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0324%18 Aug
ancient10–130.0515%17 Aug
anubis7–13-0.0115%17 Aug
anubis9–130.0124%17 Aug
ancient4–130.0118%17 Aug
mirage6–130.0419%16 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0217%16 Aug
ancient12–120.0114%15 Aug
ancient6–130.0113%14 Aug
dust213–50.0731%14 Aug
mirage5–130.0022%14 Aug
inferno13–20.0923%14 Aug
mirage9–130.0412%13 Aug
inferno10–13-0.0116%13 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0116%13 Aug
anubis11–130.049%12 Aug
mirage0–130.0230%12 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0333%12 Aug
mirage4–130.0316%12 Aug
inferno13–6-0.0226%10 Aug
mirage13–100.0126%10 Aug
mirage13–110.0512%9 Aug
ancient11–130.0610%9 Aug
ancient13–60.0810%8 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0224%8 Aug
mirage11–130.0514%8 Aug
mirage1–13-0.0932%7 Aug
anubis8–130.0712%6 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0119%5 Aug
mirage4–130.087%5 Aug
ancient6–130.0113%5 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0612%5 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0426%4 Aug
inferno9–130.0230%3 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0624%3 Aug
mirage6–13-0.029%3 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0128%2 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0319%2 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0511%1 Aug
ancient4–130.0013%1 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0132%1 Aug
mirage8–13-0.0012%30 Jul
ancient7–130.0117%22 Jul
anubis9–13-0.0130%22 Jul
anubis13–100.0218%20 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0411%20 Jul
mirage13–10.0941%19 Jul
ancient16–140.0516%19 Jul
anubis8–130.0319%19 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0617%18 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0420%18 Jul
mirage16–130.0117%15 Jul
mirage11–130.0224%15 Jul
ancient4–130.0013%15 Jul
ancient2–130.0123%14 Jul
mirage5–130.0419%13 Jul
inferno13–11-0.0312%13 Jul
dust27–130.0713%13 Jul
inferno13–110.0818%12 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0135%12 Jul
mirage7–130.0820%12 Jul
inferno3–130.0422%11 Jul
inferno5–130.0329%11 Jul
mirage7–130.0118%11 Jul
dust210–130.0323%7 Jul
inferno11–130.0420%7 Jul
ancient7–13-0.0425%7 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0519%6 Jul
ancient10–130.0131%5 Jul
dust25–13-0.0428%5 Jul
inferno12–16-0.0211%5 Jul
anubis5–130.0318%3 Jul
inferno9–130.0719%2 Jul
ancient4–130.0128%30 Jun
dust21–13-0.0127%29 Jun
ancient11–130.1518%25 Jun
overpass9–130.0525%21 Jun
dust29–130.0714%7 Jun
inferno12–12-0.0426%3 Jun
ancient7–130.0213%2 Jun
mirage13–90.1523%31 May
inferno13–70.0816%29 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →