NightKnight

NightKnight — CS2 Stats

IL76561198294842786[U:1:334577058]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

548Tracked matches41%Win rate2022Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating8,354Light Blue band · top ~62.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#22461 of 30138 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGNightKnightFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER8,354 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim65
Positioning47
Utility21

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42535Last 10042%Win rateLWWLWWLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.5
Aggression5.6
Utility2.1
Positioning4.7
Opening Duels2.5
Clutch6.0

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 636ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.5
Positioning4.7
Utility2.1
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time622ms−19ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 622ms
Headshot accuracy23.0%+3.0%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 23.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — nuke 13–3
130Biggest win — inferno
4Longest win streak
64In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 31% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27121544%0.01
dust2C2181338%-0.00
anubisD134931%0.00
ancientC114736%0.01
nukeS107370%0.02
infernoC83538%0.01
cache42250%-0.02
office2020%-0.03
italy1010%-0.10
shelter1010%0.01
fachwerk110100%-0.05
boulder110100%0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

6Matches
50%Win rate
0.61Avg K/D
57.4ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win
50%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2367%0.569.0
Anubis250%0.6810.5
Inferno10%0.6312.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.4%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.8%Spray accuracy
84.4%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
636msReaction time
34.2%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
3.4%Flash assists
6.19HE damage / grenade
2.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.382 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 34.2283% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–130.0212%29 Aug
dust213–80.038%29 Aug
mirage13–60.1226%29 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0350%28 Aug
mirage13–90.0124%28 Aug
dust213–70.0216%28 Aug
mirage8–130.0030%28 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0018%27 Aug
dust29–13-0.05100%27 Aug
inferno4–13-0.0227%26 Aug
cache13–6-0.0213%25 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0114%24 Aug
mirage13–10.0422%24 Aug
dust28–20.0131%24 Aug
cache13–4-0.0026%24 Aug
italy0–7-0.100%22 Aug
ancient13–70.0230%22 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0121%22 Aug
office12–3-0.0321%22 Aug
office8–13-0.0223%22 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0411%21 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0332%21 Aug
dust29–13-0.0423%19 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0321%19 Aug
mirage5–130.0128%19 Aug
ancient13–70.0918%16 Aug
mirage2–10.000%15 Aug
nuke13–100.0717%15 Aug
anubis13–110.0223%15 Aug
mirage3–13-0.050%15 Aug
mirage13–20.0528%15 Aug
mirage11–130.0126%14 Aug
cache10–130.0520%14 Aug
mirage13–100.0313%14 Aug
dust213–110.0412%14 Aug
anubis13–160.0316%14 Aug
cache6–13-0.1017%14 Aug
mirage9–130.0326%11 Aug
dust213–90.1120%11 Aug
nuke13–60.0117%10 Aug
dust27–130.0829%10 Aug
nuke13–30.1624%10 Aug
dust22–13-0.0225%10 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0412%9 Aug
inferno8–130.018%9 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0215%8 Aug
anubis12–160.0421%8 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0017%5 Aug
mirage13–70.0117%5 Aug
dust27–130.0031%5 Aug
dust213–11-0.0814%4 Aug
anubis4–13-0.0721%4 Aug
inferno6–130.0735%3 Aug
anubis15–15-0.0111%3 Aug
ancient1–13-0.044%1 Aug
mirage13–11-0.0119%31 Jul
dust26–13-0.0114%30 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0611%29 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0920%29 Jul
mirage13–90.0610%29 Jul
ancient10–130.0220%28 Jul
anubis16–14-0.150%27 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0417%27 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0625%26 Jul
anubis9–10.0830%26 Jul
mirage15–150.0210%26 Jul
inferno13–00.1117%26 Jul
mirage13–70.0724%24 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0132%23 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0332%23 Jul
inferno8–130.0121%22 Jul
dust28–13-0.0319%22 Jul
dust215–15-0.0227%22 Jul
mirage4–130.0431%21 Jul
ancient10–130.0419%21 Jul
dust210–13-0.0413%19 Jul
mirage7–13-0.087%18 Jul
dust25–13-0.0818%17 Jul
dust28–13-0.069%17 Jul
nuke13–100.0518%16 Jul
ancient13–40.048%16 Jul
dust28–13-0.0422%15 Jul
mirage13–50.0514%15 Jul
mirage13–40.0225%15 Jul
anubis9–130.0327%15 Jul
shelter11–130.0113%15 Jul
nuke13–90.0525%15 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0113%14 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0024%14 Jul
nuke13–10-0.0510%14 Jul
mirage7–130.0223%14 Jul
dust210–130.0434%14 Jul
dust213–60.0018%14 Jul
nuke9–6-0.0324%13 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0010%13 Jul
dust212–30.0622%13 Jul
anubis10–130.0219%13 Jul
ancient4–130.0213%13 Jul
fachwerk13–10-0.0521%13 Jul
boulder13–50.0824%13 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →