._. — CS2 Stats

76561198294299771[U:1:334034043]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

952Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating6.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating24,278Top 25% of 17,162 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#4489 of 25017 tracked

FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim94

Positioning62

Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–41–6Last 10053%Win rateTWWLLLTLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim9.4

Aggression5.8

Utility4.1

Positioning6.2

Opening Duels1.1

Clutch1.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 94 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim9.4

Positioning6.2

Utility4.1

Mechanics8.3

Opening Duels1.1

Win Impact6.2

Composite 6.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time505ms−47ms

first ⅓ avg 551ms → last ⅓ avg 505ms

Headshot accuracy20.1%+1.7%

first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — cache 13–9

13–0Biggest win — nuke

4Longest win streak

12–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 83% over 6nukeWeakest map · 38% over 13

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	27	13–14	48%	0.03
mirage	C	22	9–13	41%	0.00
anubis	A	20	12–8	60%	0.03
nuke	C	13	5–8	38%	0.02
ancient	S	11	9–2	82%	0.05
cache	S	6	5–1	83%	0.08
inferno	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

221Matches

55%Win rate

1.56Avg K/D

78.5ADR

44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

28%1v1 clutch win

22%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	24	54%	1.11	16.0
Nuke	9	44%	1.23	17.2
Anubis	9	67%	1.42	20.4
Dust2	7	71%	1.59	17.9
Ancient	6	50%	1.34	18.7
Overpass	3	33%	1.63	19.0
Inferno	3	67%	1.21	18.0
Train	1	100%	1.00	14.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.8%Headshot accuracy

42.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

45.4%Spray accuracy

87.3%Counter-strafing

7.7°Preaim

523msReaction time

30.6%T opening success

38.5%CT opening success

0.49Enemies flashed / flash

4.4%Flash assists

7.47HE damage / grenade

6.31Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4891 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 30.5645% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	15–15	-0.03	12%	27 Aug →
cache	4–0	0.16	44%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.00	20%	27 Aug →
dust2	14–16	0.07	16%	27 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.05	17%	27 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.04	33%	27 Aug →
dust2	15–15	0.02	7%	27 Aug →
mirage	3–13	-0.07	11%	26 Aug →
anubis	16–13	0.11	22%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.08	32%	26 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.00	27%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.06	20%	26 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.07	15%	26 Aug →
nuke	9–13	-0.05	8%	26 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.02	23%	26 Aug →
anubis	4–13	-0.03	38%	26 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.09	34%	25 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	24%	25 Aug →
anubis	0–2	0.00	0%	25 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.06	28%	23 Aug →
nuke	6–13	0.07	15%	23 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	9%	22 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	20%	22 Aug →
anubis	5–13	0.01	12%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–6	0.02	26%	19 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.09	11%	19 Aug →
anubis	2–13	-0.09	19%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–3	-0.08	30%	17 Aug →
anubis	16–14	0.01	18%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.05	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	20%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.05	19%	16 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.05	17%	15 Aug →
anubis	5–13	-0.02	10%	15 Aug →
cache	13–5	0.07	31%	15 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.04	27%	14 Aug →
dust2	5–13	0.00	13%	14 Aug →
dust2	16–14	0.01	28%	14 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.05	20%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–4	0.08	24%	12 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	26%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.10	11%	12 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	27%	11 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.05	16%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–5	0.02	15%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–4	0.12	15%	5 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.02	11%	5 Aug →
dust2	8–13	-0.05	14%	5 Aug →
mirage	16–14	0.08	21%	4 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.03	17%	27 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	17%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.02	15%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.01	16%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–11	0.08	12%	25 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.05	16%	24 Jul →
nuke	13–1	-0.00	20%	24 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.04	20%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–10	0.06	29%	22 Jul →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	13%	16 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	22%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–9	0.07	22%	16 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.18	12%	14 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	24%	14 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.14	13%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.07	27%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.03	7%	24 Jun →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	28%	24 Jun →
nuke	11–13	0.01	25%	23 Jun →
dust2	9–13	-0.00	24%	23 Jun →
ancient	13–6	0.06	9%	22 Jun →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	19%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	14%	22 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.02	33%	20 Jun →
anubis	7–13	0.00	10%	20 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.15	11%	20 Jun →
anubis	13–11	0.06	20%	19 Jun →
mirage	2–13	-0.01	13%	19 Jun →
dust2	15–15	-0.07	11%	18 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.05	20%	18 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.01	17%	18 Jun →
mirage	15–15	-0.01	19%	18 Jun →
dust2	15–15	0.00	22%	17 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.17	25%	27 May →
anubis	7–13	0.00	13%	27 May →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	20%	19 May →
cache	12–12	-0.04	4%	18 May →
cache	13–6	0.09	34%	18 May →
ancient	13–9	0.04	14%	18 May →
dust2	13–10	0.01	20%	18 May →
ancient	13–1	0.03	30%	17 May →
dust2	8–13	0.07	23%	17 May →
inferno	10–13	-0.06	11%	17 May →
nuke	8–13	-0.03	19%	17 May →
ancient	13–10	0.06	23%	17 May →
nuke	13–6	0.12	18%	17 May →
nuke	13–0	0.04	21%	17 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.01	17%	17 May →
dust2	7–13	0.02	19%	17 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	16%	17 May →
dust2	13–7	0.07	19%	17 May →