KeinAbiturAberFlexPur

KeinAbiturAberFlexPur — CS2 Stats

DE76561198290536090[U:1:330270362]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,772Tracked matches59%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating22,299Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#11960 of 45912 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKeinAbiturAberFlexPurFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,299 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning51
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47476Last 10047%Win rateLLWWLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.0
Aggression7.2
Utility3.3
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch4.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning5.1
Utility3.3
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.8
Win Impact7.9

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time577ms−34ms
first ⅓ avg 612ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+1.9%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — boulder 10–13
132Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
L2Current streak
81In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 73% over 11infernoWeakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC28111739%-0.00
dust2S118373%0.01
anubisB105550%0.01
cacheC104640%-0.00
nukeA74357%0.01
ancientC73443%-0.00
officeB63350%-0.00
infernoD62433%-0.02
vertigo32167%0.02
train3030%0.02
shelter220100%0.06
italy21150%0.04
fachwerk21150%0.01
boulder2020%0.04
overpass110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

94Matches
48%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
81.0ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
32%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2045%1.0015.8
Anubis1942%0.8514.1
Inferno1861%1.0015.3
Ancient1040%1.3315.6
Nuke850%0.9715.3
Cache850%1.2816.5
Vertigo633%0.8813.2
Dust2560%1.1316.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.7%Spray accuracy
79.0%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
575msReaction time
45.2%T opening success
37.6%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
8.7%Flash assists
10.06HE damage / grenade
2.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3379 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.5678% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis7–130.0323%25 Aug
office8–13-0.0225%24 Aug
office13–100.0631%24 Aug
dust213–30.0222%21 Aug
mirage11–13-0.1020%21 Aug
nuke13–80.0227%21 Aug
shelter13–40.1128%20 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0624%20 Aug
ancient13–110.0629%20 Aug
ancient13–90.0117%20 Aug
dust213–50.0821%20 Aug
mirage13–2-0.0213%20 Aug
italy13–40.0321%20 Aug
dust213–110.028%19 Aug
mirage6–130.0117%19 Aug
anubis13–20.0717%19 Aug
fachwerk9–13-0.0724%19 Aug
cache13–9-0.0127%19 Aug
dust213–3-0.0331%19 Aug
italy10–130.0426%18 Aug
cache3–13-0.0221%18 Aug
mirage10–130.0219%18 Aug
mirage6–130.0234%18 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0324%18 Aug
inferno13–80.0213%18 Aug
overpass13–11-0.0110%18 Aug
vertigo12–12-0.0115%18 Aug
office13–7-0.0624%18 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0320%18 Aug
dust213–60.0824%18 Aug
nuke5–130.0017%18 Aug
mirage7–130.0621%18 Aug
train9–130.0432%18 Aug
nuke9–60.1121%18 Aug
inferno4–9-0.1321%18 Aug
inferno8–8-0.0528%18 Aug
mirage5–130.0231%16 Aug
inferno13–30.0817%14 Aug
anubis13–30.1119%14 Aug
nuke7–130.0339%14 Aug
mirage13–90.0822%14 Aug
inferno9–13-0.0115%14 Aug
mirage1–13-0.089%14 Aug
mirage13–90.0022%13 Aug
anubis2–13-0.0417%13 Aug
cache13–16-0.0227%12 Aug
cache6–13-0.0218%12 Aug
cache13–110.0114%12 Aug
anubis13–50.0121%12 Aug
mirage13–70.0514%12 Aug
ancient13–80.0215%11 Aug
anubis13–7-0.010%11 Aug
mirage10–130.0627%11 Aug
nuke5–13-0.0925%11 Aug
cache9–13-0.0118%11 Aug
mirage13–8-0.0429%11 Aug
cache13–6-0.0023%11 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0321%11 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0712%11 Aug
dust27–13-0.0310%11 Aug
mirage13–30.0016%11 Aug
office8–130.0524%10 Aug
anubis13–10-0.036%10 Aug
mirage9–130.0516%5 Aug
nuke13–90.0013%5 Aug
office8–13-0.0212%5 Aug
vertigo13–30.0420%2 Aug
vertigo13–110.0235%29 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0425%29 Jul
office13–3-0.0133%28 Jul
boulder10–130.1324%28 Jul
mirage8–13-0.047%26 Jul
mirage8–13-0.0128%26 Jul
train12–120.0215%25 Jul
nuke13–30.0226%25 Jul
mirage13–110.0322%21 Jul
mirage15–150.0016%21 Jul
mirage1–13-0.0018%21 Jul
dust29–130.0217%20 Jul
ancient12–12-0.0414%18 Jul
cache6–13-0.0232%18 Jul
dust213–100.0625%15 Jul
anubis12–120.0117%14 Jul
train4–130.0131%14 Jul
cache8–130.0318%14 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0519%13 Jul
mirage12–16-0.0123%13 Jul
ancient10–13-0.0519%13 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0215%13 Jul
dust213–80.007%13 Jul
dust23–13-0.0819%13 Jul
dust213–9-0.0215%13 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0412%13 Jul
mirage13–100.0519%13 Jul
ancient2–13-0.0227%13 Jul
boulder6–13-0.0530%12 Jul
fachwerk13–70.0920%12 Jul
shelter13–100.018%12 Jul
mirage13–80.008%11 Jul
cache13–110.0220%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →