est1cky

est1cky — CS2 Stats

US76561198284175578[U:1:323909850]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

830Tracked matches69%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,999 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGest1ckyFACEITLevel 8 · 1,999 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning54
Utility50

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT60391Last 10060%Win rateWWWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.4
Aggression6.3
Utility5.0
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels2.4
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 48% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 586ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.4
Utility5.0
Mechanics8.0
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact10.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time572ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 555ms → last ⅓ avg 572ms
Headshot accuracy19.2%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.35Best rating — cache 3–0
130Biggest win — dust2
9Longest win streak
W9Current streak
76In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 100% over 5dust2Weakest map · 50% over 24
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2720774%0.03
dust2B24121250%0.03
nukeB168850%0.03
ancientB168850%0.01
infernoA106460%0.03
cacheS550100%0.12
overpass21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (50% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

336Matches
54%Win rate
1.39Avg K/D
91.6ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage5456%1.4518.9
Dust23560%1.4920.5
Inferno3253%1.3819.0
Ancient2759%1.3918.8
Anubis2357%1.3922.2
Nuke1867%1.2920.5
Overpass633%1.3720.5
Train540%1.5321.2

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.2%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.7%Spray accuracy
85.9%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
586msReaction time
31.2%T opening success
48.3%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
3.80HE damage / grenade
13.06Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.2075% — below the 40% mark we flag

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–9-0.0017%18 Jul
dust213–70.0919%17 Jul
mirage13–9-0.017%9 Jul
mirage13–50.0117%9 Jul
dust213–00.1020%5 Jul
nuke13–50.0725%5 Jul
inferno13–3-0.0419%5 Jul
ancient13–100.0923%5 Jul
mirage13–40.0411%5 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0315%5 Jul
dust216–130.0418%3 Jul
dust23–13-0.0623%30 Jun
dust214–16-0.0033%28 Jun
ancient16–140.0213%28 Jun
mirage15–15-0.0124%28 Jun
dust210–130.0330%28 Jun
nuke13–90.0215%28 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0319%28 Jun
nuke2–8-0.0320%28 Jun
ancient13–10.1025%28 Jun
nuke13–80.0416%28 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0117%27 Jun
ancient13–30.0716%23 Jun
mirage13–100.0019%23 Jun
inferno7–13-0.0716%22 Jun
dust213–90.1226%21 Jun
dust213–50.0221%21 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0220%21 Jun
dust210–130.0313%21 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0415%21 Jun
inferno13–10.1935%21 Jun
dust213–40.0210%21 Jun
nuke13–110.0016%20 Jun
dust213–60.0322%20 Jun
inferno13–16-0.0412%19 Jun
mirage16–140.0622%19 Jun
mirage10–130.0320%17 Jun
dust210–13-0.0221%17 Jun
mirage13–110.0811%17 Jun
nuke13–80.0112%17 Jun
nuke10–130.0621%17 Jun
ancient13–90.0415%17 Jun
mirage13–30.0738%15 Jun
nuke13–16-0.0129%14 Jun
dust213–50.1020%14 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0314%14 Jun
inferno0–2-0.080%14 Jun
nuke7–13-0.0113%12 Jun
ancient13–70.0418%11 Jun
ancient13–80.0429%11 Jun
mirage13–50.0521%11 Jun
mirage13–80.0813%11 Jun
mirage13–40.0713%11 Jun
dust213–20.2422%11 Jun
nuke14–160.0420%11 Jun
mirage13–60.0519%10 Jun
mirage5–10.0938%10 Jun
inferno13–70.0920%10 Jun
ancient16–130.0722%10 Jun
inferno13–80.0226%10 Jun
mirage13–90.0823%10 Jun
dust213–40.0212%9 Jun
ancient12–160.0216%9 Jun
dust26–13-0.0241%9 Jun
ancient0–13-0.0613%8 Jun
nuke10–130.0018%8 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0820%6 Jun
dust26–13-0.0216%6 Jun
mirage10–130.0522%6 Jun
ancient4–13-0.105%6 Jun
mirage13–6-0.0215%6 Jun
nuke13–30.0728%6 Jun
dust21–13-0.0727%6 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0315%5 Jun
nuke13–60.0730%5 Jun
mirage13–60.0717%5 Jun
inferno13–70.0216%5 Jun
mirage2–13-0.0516%5 Jun
overpass13–110.0613%5 Jun
dust27–13-0.0420%4 Jun
nuke3–00.1342%4 Jun
dust21–13-0.1222%4 Jun
dust211–13-0.0025%1 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0223%1 Jun
cache13–80.0317%1 Jun
ancient9–130.0126%31 May
ancient6–130.0121%31 May
cache13–40.1532%31 May
cache13–60.0928%31 May
cache3–00.3550%31 May
mirage13–80.0718%31 May
dust210–130.0318%31 May
nuke9–13-0.0216%29 May
dust213–60.1426%28 May
overpass3–13-0.0319%27 May
mirage16–12-0.0226%27 May
inferno11–130.0822%26 May
dust213–00.0223%26 May
mirage13–11-0.0013%26 May
inferno13–50.1423%26 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →