lililop — CS2 Stats

76561198282878150[U:1:322612422]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,617Tracked matches53%Win rate2022Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidPassive Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,138Purple band · top ~15.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#12603 of 24272 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian II

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning42

Utility47

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD50–46–4Last 10050%Win rateWLLLLLLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1

Aggression3.9

Utility4.7

Positioning4.2

Opening Duels0.0

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.1° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 40 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning4.2

Utility4.7

Mechanics7.9

Opening Duels0.7

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.01

Reaction time584ms−17ms

first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 584ms

Headshot accuracy14.8%−2.3%

first ⅓ avg 17.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — anubis 13–2

13–1Biggest win — dust2

7Longest win streak

10–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8anubisWeakest map · 37% over 19

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	29	11–18	38%	-0.01
anubis	C	19	7–12	37%	-0.01
ancient	A	13	8–5	62%	-0.01
vertigo	S	10	7–3	70%	0.00
cache	B	8	4–4	50%	-0.03
inferno	S	8	6–2	75%	0.00
mirage	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
boulder	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07
nuke	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.02
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.02
overpass	—	1	1–0	100%	0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

57Matches

56%Win rate

1.19Avg K/D

74.5ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

19%1v1 clutch win

17%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Dust2	19	74%	1.29	15.1
Mirage	10	60%	1.32	14.9
Ancient	8	38%	0.84	12.5
Anubis	6	67%	1.36	17.5
Nuke	5	40%	0.78	10.0
Inferno	4	50%	1.38	16.3
Vertigo	4	25%	1.06	14.8
Train	1	0%	1.25	20.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.7%Headshot accuracy

39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

46.9%Spray accuracy

85.5%Counter-strafing

10.1°Preaim

585msReaction time

22.1%T opening success

35.7%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

6.9%Flash assists

8.56HE damage / grenade

5.20Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.6622% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →
Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4815 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 22.0507% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–10	-0.06	15%	21 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.01	22%	21 Aug →
ancient	14–16	0.05	9%	21 Aug →
anubis	9–13	-0.00	23%	9 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.05	18%	3 Aug →
boulder	10–13	0.01	13%	3 Aug →
anubis	10–13	0.06	17%	3 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.02	18%	2 Aug →
dust2	13–9	-0.07	14%	2 Aug →
inferno	2–13	-0.01	7%	2 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.07	12%	2 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.07	15%	1 Aug →
anubis	16–13	-0.04	12%	1 Aug →
anubis	13–16	-0.04	13%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–5	-0.00	21%	29 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.07	22%	29 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.03	13%	27 Jul →
cache	13–9	-0.01	15%	27 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	11%	26 Jul →
cache	0–8	-0.02	30%	26 Jul →
cache	6–13	-0.05	12%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.16	17%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	11%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–9	-0.03	7%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–7	0.03	16%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–8	-0.04	14%	19 Jul →
mirage	13–8	0.02	10%	19 Jul →
cache	13–9	0.00	16%	19 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.01	16%	19 Jul →
dust2	13–9	0.02	17%	19 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.05	13%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	6%	19 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.02	14%	19 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.04	5%	17 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	24%	17 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	18%	17 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.06	18%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.04	19%	15 Jul →
dust2	7–13	0.01	11%	15 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	20%	13 Jul →
dust2	13–11	-0.02	17%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–2	-0.03	9%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.03	9%	12 Jul →
vertigo	9–13	-0.02	18%	12 Jul →
fachwerk	11–13	-0.07	25%	11 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	11%	11 Jul →
dust2	12–12	-0.02	6%	11 Jul →
dust2	12–12	0.08	23%	11 Jul →
vertigo	13–8	0.00	19%	9 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.08	13%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.02	19%	9 Jul →
vertigo	13–3	0.08	10%	8 Jul →
vertigo	13–7	0.00	15%	8 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.05	19%	8 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.07	24%	7 Jul →
vertigo	13–2	-0.04	22%	5 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.08	19%	5 Jul →
ancient	13–5	0.01	14%	5 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	31%	5 Jul →
vertigo	13–9	-0.01	15%	4 Jul →
vertigo	12–12	-0.05	13%	4 Jul →
dust2	8–13	0.03	19%	4 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	30%	4 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	15%	3 Jul →
vertigo	11–13	-0.04	22%	3 Jul →
vertigo	6–1	0.01	25%	3 Jul →
nuke	9–7	-0.02	11%	28 Jun →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	19%	28 Jun →
cache	13–10	-0.03	14%	28 Jun →
dust2	12–16	-0.00	27%	28 Jun →
train	12–12	0.02	13%	27 Jun →
overpass	13–5	0.06	21%	27 Jun →
anubis	14–16	0.05	16%	27 Jun →
ancient	13–16	-0.05	14%	27 Jun →
anubis	8–13	-0.03	16%	27 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.04	7%	27 Jun →
anubis	13–11	-0.03	21%	26 Jun →
dust2	13–4	-0.01	15%	21 Jun →
anubis	13–6	-0.05	11%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–10	-0.01	20%	21 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.05	10%	14 Jun →
dust2	5–13	-0.03	14%	14 Jun →
dust2	16–13	-0.01	18%	14 Jun →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	8%	14 Jun →
dust2	13–11	0.03	26%	14 Jun →
ancient	16–12	0.02	16%	13 Jun →
ancient	13–11	0.01	15%	13 Jun →
inferno	9–13	-0.07	9%	13 Jun →
anubis	3–13	-0.00	19%	9 Jun →
mirage	7–13	-0.02	10%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–7	0.03	27%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.03	20%	7 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.13	11%	7 Jun →
mirage	6–13	-0.03	31%	7 Jun →
dust2	13–1	0.08	20%	7 Jun →
inferno	9–1	0.12	29%	7 Jun →
dust2	14–16	0.05	17%	7 Jun →
ancient	13–7	0.09	15%	7 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	14%	7 Jun →
anubis	6–13	-0.04	20%	7 Jun →