sheninho™ — CS2 Stats

76561198281423556[U:1:321157828]

998Tracked matches53%Win rate2021Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating18,664Purple band · top ~13.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#11559 of 23209 tracked

FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73

Positioning46

Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY54–40–6Last 10054%Win rateLLLWWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.3

Aggression4.7

Utility5.8

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels0.4

Clutch2.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 561ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3

Positioning4.6

Utility5.8

Mechanics4.7

Opening Duels0.6

Win Impact6.1

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00

Reaction time566ms−83ms

first ⅓ avg 648ms → last ⅓ avg 566ms

Headshot accuracy18.8%−3.4%

first ⅓ avg 22.2% → last ⅓ avg 18.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–0Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

L3Current streak

12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

17Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 15mirageWeakest map · 38% over 24

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	C	24	9–15	38%	0.02
inferno	A	22	12–10	55%	0.01
anubis	S	15	10–5	67%	-0.01
nuke	A	13	8–5	62%	0.02
ancient	A	13	8–5	62%	0.01
cache	B	10	5–5	50%	-0.01
vertigo	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00
poseidon	—	1	1–0	100%	0.02
dust2	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

78Matches

53%Win rate

0.94Avg K/D

79.7ADR

52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	18	72%	0.98	15.2
Anubis	15	40%	0.88	16.1
Mirage	14	36%	0.87	15.5
Nuke	10	60%	1.01	15.8
Cache	5	40%	1.09	16.0
Ancient	5	20%	0.79	13.8
Dust2	5	60%	0.99	13.0
Vertigo	3	100%	1.21	19.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.2%Headshot accuracy

34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

36.5%Spray accuracy

71.1%Counter-strafing

7.4°Preaim

561msReaction time

28.8%T opening success

34.5%CT opening success

0.43Enemies flashed / flash

5.5%Flash assists

7.61HE damage / grenade

12.91Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4274 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 28.8253% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
mirage	9–13	0.01	14%	29 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.02	17%	29 Aug →
anubis	7–13	-0.06	25%	26 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.09	26%	23 Aug →
vertigo	13–9	-0.00	28%	21 Aug →
poseidon	9–7	0.02	24%	19 Aug →
anubis	13–11	0.04	20%	19 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	12%	18 Aug →
ancient	16–14	-0.07	13%	18 Aug →
inferno	16–14	-0.01	15%	18 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.06	21%	17 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.02	14%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.02	23%	16 Aug →
anubis	10–13	-0.03	13%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.14	24%	16 Aug →
nuke	16–12	0.01	16%	16 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.05	22%	16 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.04	22%	16 Aug →
mirage	4–13	-0.12	12%	16 Aug →
mirage	13–10	0.03	17%	16 Aug →
cache	8–13	0.06	12%	16 Aug →
inferno	13–16	0.06	17%	15 Aug →
inferno	3–13	-0.03	17%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–4	-0.01	24%	15 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.02	23%	15 Aug →
cache	10–13	-0.04	16%	15 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	18%	15 Aug →
mirage	13–9	0.05	20%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–3	0.08	26%	14 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.06	17%	14 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	12%	14 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.10	19%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–2	-0.01	24%	14 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.04	26%	14 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	18%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–10	-0.01	20%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.10	24%	13 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.03	24%	13 Aug →
anubis	6–13	0.00	24%	13 Aug →
inferno	16–12	0.01	11%	13 Aug →
cache	13–3	-0.00	27%	13 Aug →
nuke	12–16	-0.02	19%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–5	-0.02	30%	12 Aug →
inferno	15–15	0.02	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	5–13	0.01	22%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.01	20%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.01	12%	11 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.02	20%	11 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.05	15%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–1	0.08	21%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	31%	10 Aug →
ancient	13–8	0.13	16%	10 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	23%	10 Aug →
nuke	16–14	0.05	14%	8 Aug →
anubis	15–15	-0.00	18%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.08	27%	8 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.01	21%	8 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.08	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	28%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–11	0.02	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.07	20%	8 Aug →
inferno	8–13	0.00	26%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.07	22%	8 Aug →
ancient	12–16	-0.00	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	14–16	0.01	23%	7 Aug →
nuke	8–13	-0.04	14%	7 Aug →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	15%	7 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.07	16%	4 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.02	7%	4 Aug →
cache	9–13	-0.01	24%	4 Aug →
inferno	13–5	0.02	25%	3 Aug →
inferno	10–13	0.01	33%	28 Jul →
mirage	5–13	0.04	27%	28 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.00	15%	28 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.12	20%	28 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.01	20%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.01	9%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–5	0.04	30%	27 Jul →
anubis	13–1	0.05	30%	27 Jul →
ancient	14–16	-0.01	18%	27 Jul →
cache	5–3	-0.05	42%	27 Jul →
mirage	13–16	-0.02	24%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–11	-0.03	16%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.07	22%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.06	24%	26 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.05	12%	26 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.09	19%	24 Jul →
dust2	6–13	-0.07	31%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–6	0.05	20%	24 Jul →
ancient	13–0	0.00	10%	24 Jul →
inferno	11–13	-0.01	24%	24 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.06	24%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–4	0.09	31%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.11	24%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–8	-0.05	20%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–7	0.11	22%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–9	-0.01	25%	23 Jul →
inferno	11–13	0.04	27%	23 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	16%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.04	25%	22 Jul →