felgato — CS2 Stats

76561198273477953[U:1:313212225]

224Tracked matches57%Win rate2021Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning46
Utility30

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49474Last 10049%Win rateLLWLLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression4.7
Utility3.0
Positioning4.6
Opening Duels1.3

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 620ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.6
Utility3.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time617ms−24ms
first ⅓ avg 641ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 22.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 4–0
130Biggest win — ancient
8Longest win streak
L2Current streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 39% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC32141844%0.01
dust2C1871139%0.01
ancientA1810856%0.01
nukeC104640%0.00
infernoA106460%-0.00
anubisS54180%0.01
overpass43175%0.06
cache21150%0.03
train1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

22Matches
36%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.5%Headshot accuracy
37.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.0%Spray accuracy
86.3%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
620msReaction time
24.5%T opening success
46.1%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
0.3%Flash assists
4.51HE damage / grenade
3.00Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.9984 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.4673% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust29–130.0214%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0918%22 Aug
ancient13–70.0120%22 Aug
nuke13–16-0.0223%14 Jul
overpass14–160.0322%22 Jun
nuke13–80.0413%22 Jun
dust213–70.0310%22 Jun
mirage1–13-0.0522%22 Jun
mirage9–130.0925%21 Jun
dust213–40.0731%21 Jun
ancient13–00.000%21 Jun
mirage16–130.0723%19 Jun
ancient13–4-0.0510%19 Jun
inferno13–110.0222%19 Jun
ancient13–11-0.0120%18 Jun
mirage13–80.0620%18 Jun
mirage13–4-0.0015%18 Jun
mirage7–130.0418%17 Jun
nuke11–130.0215%17 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0513%16 Jun
dust213–50.0318%16 Jun
ancient11–130.0717%16 Jun
dust213–100.1130%16 Jun
overpass13–8-0.0120%16 Jun
nuke7–130.0014%16 Jun
anubis13–30.1019%16 Jun
mirage13–60.0220%15 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0121%14 Jun
ancient13–90.0725%14 Jun
inferno9–13-0.0632%13 Jun
inferno10–0-0.0150%13 Jun
dust215–150.1022%12 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0114%11 Jun
dust23–13-0.0417%10 Jun
overpass13–100.1224%10 Jun
ancient13–60.0719%10 Jun
ancient3–130.0415%9 Jun
dust213–160.0824%8 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0122%8 Jun
inferno15–150.0114%8 Jun
mirage11–13-0.0120%8 Jun
anubis16–120.0321%8 Jun
ancient16–14-0.0213%7 Jun
nuke13–5-0.0716%7 Jun
inferno8–130.0019%7 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0513%7 Jun
dust213–110.0431%6 Jun
nuke13–60.0243%6 Jun
dust28–130.0222%5 Jun
mirage4–00.1450%5 Jun
ancient8–130.0535%5 Jun
mirage6–130.0220%5 Jun
ancient15–15-0.0323%5 Jun
mirage0–13-0.1650%5 Jun
mirage6–13-0.099%5 Jun
anubis13–6-0.0614%5 Jun
inferno13–10-0.0315%4 Jun
dust213–40.0323%4 Jun
mirage0–4-0.090%3 Jun
dust26–1-0.090%3 Jun
ancient13–110.044%3 Jun
dust210–13-0.0612%2 Jun
mirage13–40.0036%1 Jun
dust27–13-0.0526%30 May
ancient8–13-0.0132%29 May
nuke4–10.0513%29 May
overpass13–90.1021%29 May
mirage13–100.0821%29 May
inferno2–13-0.0821%29 May
cache13–60.104%28 May
anubis13–110.0223%28 May
mirage5–70.0517%27 May
inferno16–140.0220%27 May
cache9–13-0.0333%27 May
mirage9–130.0235%27 May
mirage13–70.0618%27 May
dust212–120.0921%26 May
mirage13–70.1027%24 May
mirage2–13-0.0610%24 May
ancient13–70.0837%24 May
mirage13–2-0.0318%23 May
nuke0–9-0.020%20 May
mirage9–130.0439%19 May
dust22–13-0.059%18 May
inferno13–60.0812%15 May
dust29–130.0424%14 May
mirage11–130.0735%2 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0617%28 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0130%16 Jun
ancient1–13-0.0544%16 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0126%16 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0825%12 Jun
mirage13–80.0827%11 Jun
inferno13–90.0115%11 Jun
nuke10–130.0326%10 Jun
ancient13–2-0.0118%9 Jun
mirage11–130.0127%8 Jun
train14–160.0411%7 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0120%3 Jun
mirage13–50.0421%3 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →