Peanut Butter Baby

Peanut Butter Baby — CS2 Stats

US76561198272438786[U:1:312173058]Steam profile ↗

1,000Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler
FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGPeanut Butter BabyFACEITLevel 10STANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim79
Positioning45
Utility42

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55441Last 10055%Win rateLWLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.9
Aggression4.6
Utility4.2
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels0.4
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 34 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 573ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.9
Positioning4.5
Utility4.2
Mechanics7.4
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time555ms−40ms
first ⅓ avg 595ms → last ⅓ avg 555ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%−0.5%
first ⅓ avg 23.0% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.13Best rating — inferno 13–5
131Biggest win — dust2
8Longest win streak
87In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 18dust2Weakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1991047%-0.00
dust2C1881044%-0.00
infernoS1812667%0.04
overpassA148657%0.01
ancientA117464%0.01
nukeA95456%0.01
anubisS64267%0.04
train21150%0.04
cache110100%-0.00
thera1010%-0.02
vertigo1010%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

650Matches
53%Win rate
1.25Avg K/D
76.5ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis3762%1.2217.0
Mirage2654%1.0916.1
Inferno2552%1.3017.8
Dust22450%0.9014.1
Vertigo2339%1.0215.2
Ancient2245%1.2118.4
Nuke1958%1.0513.5
Overpass560%1.0314.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.3%Spray accuracy
83.5%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
573msReaction time
28.1%T opening success
35.5%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.7%Flash assists
5.82HE damage / grenade
6.62Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.0521% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0736%11 Jul
cache13–6-0.009%11 Jul
nuke3–130.0123%11 Jul
nuke13–30.1222%11 Jul
dust24–13-0.0343%4 Jul
dust211–13-0.0322%28 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0027%26 Jun
dust213–20.0645%26 Jun
inferno10–130.0728%25 Jun
mirage13–70.0319%19 Jun
anubis16–140.0518%18 Jun
mirage13–9-0.0517%17 Jun
nuke13–50.0219%14 Feb
ancient13–70.1014%5 Feb
inferno13–110.0227%5 Feb
dust211–13-0.0229%3 Feb
nuke7–13-0.0424%2 Feb
overpass8–13-0.0017%2 Feb
inferno13–90.0414%1 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0122%30 Jan
anubis12–20.0532%30 Jan
dust216–13-0.0116%29 Jan
anubis13–11-0.079%29 Jan
nuke13–70.0628%28 Jan
dust213–40.0324%28 Jan
inferno13–50.1236%25 Jan
dust213–100.0222%15 Jan
overpass16–13-0.0323%14 Jan
mirage10–13-0.0214%13 Jan
dust26–13-0.0813%2 Dec
ancient0–13-0.020%30 Nov
overpass10–30.0612%30 Nov
inferno13–50.0636%30 Nov
dust29–13-0.0325%25 Nov
ancient13–100.0623%17 Nov
inferno15–150.0116%17 Nov
overpass13–90.0119%15 Nov
ancient8–13-0.0712%15 Nov
mirage7–130.0219%15 Nov
overpass7–130.0218%14 Nov
mirage10–13-0.0117%14 Nov
nuke13–80.0117%10 Nov
inferno13–8-0.0417%9 Nov
train11–130.0216%3 Nov
inferno13–60.0529%3 Nov
dust213–90.0124%26 Oct
inferno16–120.0319%22 Oct
overpass13–70.0729%22 Oct
ancient13–5-0.0518%22 Oct
overpass13–7-0.0125%13 Oct
dust213–90.0421%13 Oct
nuke8–13-0.0523%29 Sept
nuke10–130.0129%26 Sept
dust29–130.0228%26 Sept
dust29–130.0318%25 Sept
mirage16–14-0.0024%25 Sept
overpass13–50.0127%25 Sept
dust27–13-0.0724%24 Sept
overpass13–110.0222%18 Sept
dust213–1-0.0324%18 Sept
overpass10–13-0.0120%17 Sept
inferno9–130.0312%17 Sept
ancient11–130.0617%16 Sept
train13–30.0724%16 Sept
mirage13–6-0.0118%14 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0621%14 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0213%13 Sept
dust27–130.0330%13 Sept
inferno1–80.0421%12 Sept
ancient13–90.0627%8 Sept
inferno13–50.1325%6 Sept
overpass11–130.0324%4 Sept
dust213–40.0432%4 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0813%4 Sept
overpass13–9-0.049%16 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0022%16 Aug
overpass6–130.0736%11 Aug
mirage13–80.0416%11 Aug
ancient13–5-0.0417%9 Aug
ancient13–6-0.019%9 Aug
inferno16–140.0523%6 Aug
overpass6–13-0.0219%6 Aug
inferno13–90.0417%2 Aug
mirage13–110.0122%30 Jul
mirage13–100.0624%25 Jul
mirage13–50.0527%25 Jul
nuke11–4-0.0332%24 Jul
inferno8–130.0221%24 Oct
thera11–13-0.0232%10 Oct
anubis13–60.0624%10 Oct
inferno13–100.0925%30 Sept
ancient19–17-0.0123%24 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0531%24 Sept
inferno13–7-0.0116%22 Sept
anubis8–130.0721%21 Sept
mirage17–19-0.0424%19 Sept
ancient6–130.0224%15 Sept
mirage13–8-0.0031%2 Sept
anubis9–130.0728%2 Sept
vertigo10–13-0.0214%11 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 101,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →