CEREAL PEQUENO

CEREAL PEQUENO — CS2 Stats

PT76561198258733131[U:1:298467403]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

848Tracked matches31%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating23,649Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~4.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1652 of 6860 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,191 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

23,649Peak Premier on CSDB
2,191Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB
1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,191
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 309 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 23,649
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 1,351 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGCEREAL PEQUENOFACEITLevel 10 · 2,191 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER23,649 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,191csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning63
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45478Last 10045%Win rateLLLWLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.0
Aggression5.9
Utility2.9
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.6
Clutch2.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.3° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 50% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning6.3
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact0.0

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.05 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time569ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 569ms
Headshot accuracy26.0%+3.7%
first ⅓ avg 22.3% → last ⅓ avg 26.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — anubis 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
37In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 17% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheC2291341%0.03
mirageC2191243%0.01
infernoB189950%0.03
dust2S139469%0.05
nukeB115645%0.02
anubisD61517%0.10
ancient42250%-0.02
vertigo2020%0.09
overpass1010%0.18
boulder1010%0.03
train110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

267Matches
58%Win rate
1.26Avg K/D
87.8ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
29%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage7659%1.2218.4
Dust23355%1.3218.9
Ancient2548%1.1418.5
Inferno1963%1.1917.4
Nuke1267%1.4320.6
Vertigo1164%1.2016.1
Overpass1145%1.0916.4
Anubis743%1.2119.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.8%Headshot accuracy
36.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.3%Spray accuracy
79.3%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
592msReaction time
30.7%T opening success
49.9%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
1.4%Flash assists
9.84HE damage / grenade
2.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3167 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.663% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno6–130.0615%27 Aug
nuke9–130.0422%25 Aug
mirage7–130.0550%24 Aug
inferno9–60.0226%24 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0516%23 Aug
mirage13–10.1419%23 Aug
dust211–130.0217%22 Aug
dust213–90.0427%22 Aug
inferno13–90.0322%22 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0220%21 Aug
dust26–13-0.0818%20 Aug
vertigo10–130.0120%16 Aug
overpass9–130.1826%16 Aug
cache13–40.1322%16 Aug
dust213–30.0438%16 Aug
inferno6–90.0814%16 Aug
nuke7–9-0.0938%16 Aug
nuke2–13-0.0221%14 Aug
mirage11–13-0.0223%12 Aug
mirage16–130.0420%8 Aug
mirage8–130.0324%5 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0326%4 Aug
cache0–6-0.0550%4 Aug
cache5–130.0432%19 Jul
inferno13–110.0123%19 Jul
anubis12–160.0627%19 Jul
cache11–130.0524%19 Jul
dust213–3-0.0226%19 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0225%17 Jul
cache7–130.0111%17 Jul
cache0–13-0.0667%16 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0428%15 Jul
mirage10–130.0321%14 Jul
mirage1–13-0.1033%14 Jul
nuke13–20.1221%14 Jul
cache13–40.0436%14 Jul
ancient3–13-0.084%14 Jul
inferno8–130.0216%13 Jul
mirage13–70.1026%13 Jul
nuke13–4-0.0029%13 Jul
inferno13–7-0.0427%13 Jul
inferno15–150.0014%12 Jul
cache13–11-0.0417%12 Jul
inferno12–12-0.0325%12 Jul
cache11–130.0320%12 Jul
boulder6–130.0319%12 Jul
cache8–130.1231%11 Jul
cache13–60.0815%9 Jul
anubis7–130.0435%9 Jul
mirage13–40.0023%9 Jul
dust213–100.1131%9 Jul
nuke13–70.0216%5 Jul
inferno13–100.0325%5 Jul
anubis10–130.0723%5 Jul
mirage15–150.0734%5 Jul
mirage10–130.0023%5 Jul
nuke13–30.028%5 Jul
inferno16–130.0020%5 Jul
dust213–70.1122%4 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0220%27 Jun
mirage13–80.0918%27 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0222%27 Jun
mirage13–70.0226%23 Jun
inferno5–130.0419%23 Jun
inferno6–130.0624%21 Jun
dust213–30.1038%21 Jun
cache2–13-0.0129%21 Jun
mirage10–130.0421%19 Jun
ancient13–20.0329%19 Jun
inferno13–20.0317%11 Jun
inferno13–80.0920%6 Jun
dust213–10.1735%6 Jun
dust213–80.0822%4 Jun
inferno12–120.0039%4 Jun
train13–10-0.0136%2 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0121%1 Jun
dust211–130.0229%31 May
mirage2–13-0.0217%30 May
nuke5–130.1222%27 May
nuke12–120.0530%24 May
anubis12–120.0818%24 May
mirage13–80.0117%24 May
inferno13–90.1424%24 May
cache13–90.1230%24 May
dust28–130.0424%23 May
dust213–20.0622%22 May
cache9–13-0.0012%20 May
cache8–130.0114%18 May
anubis9–130.0916%17 May
anubis13–30.2324%17 May
mirage7–13-0.0719%15 May
cache11–13-0.0611%13 May
cache12–12-0.0518%13 May
vertigo10–130.1732%9 May
mirage13–90.0013%9 May
cache13–30.0613%8 May
cache13–40.1028%8 May
cache9–13-0.0018%8 May
cache13–100.0720%7 May
cache13–60.1326%5 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →