OG $plit

OG $plit — CS2 Stats

DE76561198258008589[U:1:297742861]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

887Tracked matches43%Win rate2024Tracked since
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating9,095Light Blue band · top ~59.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#41637 of 57008 tracked
WingmanGold Nova I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOG $plitPREMIER9,095 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning52
Utility33

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49483Last 10049%Win rateLLWWLWWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.2
Aggression8.9
Utility3.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.5
Clutch5.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 657ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.2
Utility3.3
Mechanics5.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.04 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time656ms+5ms
first ⅓ avg 651ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+5.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.20Best rating — poseidon 9–4
132Biggest win — mirage
5Longest win streak
L2Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

vertigoBest map · 80% over 5infernoWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB1991047%0.02
ancientA1912763%0.05
infernoD123925%0.01
anubisD113827%0.01
dust2A106460%0.02
nukeA85363%0.04
cacheC73443%0.01
vertigoS54180%0.10
poseidon32167%0.04
overpass32167%0.11
office2020%-0.02
debris1010%0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
40%Win rate
0.76Avg K/D
68.5ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
27%1v2 clutch win
2Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage850%0.7812.3
Inferno30%0.8514.0
Ancient2100%0.8813.0
Anubis10%0.569.0
Dust210%0.254.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.6%Headshot accuracy
36.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.5%Spray accuracy
74.6%Counter-strafing
9.4°Preaim
657msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.48Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
6.74HE damage / grenade
5.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4773 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4677% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage1–130.0619%16 Aug
cache6–130.0830%16 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0126%15 Aug
mirage13–60.0828%15 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0618%15 Aug
ancient9–00.0833%15 Aug
vertigo13–100.1224%15 Aug
anubis2–130.0328%14 Aug
ancient5–130.0631%14 Aug
dust213–3-0.0327%14 Aug
cache11–130.0127%14 Aug
mirage13–20.1119%14 Aug
ancient13–60.1130%13 Aug
inferno11–130.0118%13 Aug
ancient10–130.0112%13 Aug
anubis3–13-0.0719%13 Aug
nuke11–130.0420%12 Aug
mirage7–13-0.0216%12 Aug
ancient13–70.0716%12 Aug
dust22–13-0.0238%11 Aug
mirage15–15-0.0120%11 Aug
dust24–130.0113%10 Aug
dust213–40.0320%10 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0220%10 Aug
ancient13–10-0.0019%10 Aug
dust216–140.0033%9 Aug
mirage12–120.0726%9 Aug
vertigo13–40.0918%9 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0118%8 Aug
poseidon9–70.0623%8 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0817%8 Aug
poseidon4–9-0.139%8 Aug
inferno2–13-0.029%8 Aug
poseidon9–40.2027%7 Aug
nuke13–100.0219%7 Aug
inferno10–130.0117%7 Aug
dust26–130.0421%2 Aug
cache4–0-0.1150%2 Aug
office7–13-0.0014%2 Aug
anubis11–130.0622%2 Aug
vertigo13–50.0718%2 Aug
mirage9–130.0310%2 Aug
nuke16–14-0.0211%1 Aug
inferno16–140.0118%1 Aug
mirage5–13-0.069%1 Aug
ancient13–110.0520%1 Aug
mirage3–130.0622%1 Aug
cache7–130.0221%1 Aug
mirage13–80.1625%31 Jul
vertigo13–60.1311%31 Jul
nuke13–110.1017%31 Jul
ancient13–80.0711%31 Jul
anubis6–130.0734%31 Jul
overpass13–80.1628%30 Jul
vertigo5–130.0725%30 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0615%30 Jul
nuke16–120.0315%30 Jul
mirage13–20.0523%30 Jul
ancient13–70.0319%29 Jul
mirage13–5-0.0417%29 Jul
debris5–90.0418%29 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0214%27 Jul
overpass6–90.0526%26 Jul
office5–11-0.0517%22 Jul
cache13–11-0.0118%22 Jul
overpass9–40.1226%21 Jul
dust27–130.0330%21 Jul
nuke11–13-0.0120%21 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0519%20 Jul
mirage16–14-0.039%20 Jul
nuke13–70.0922%20 Jul
inferno13–70.1014%20 Jul
ancient13–80.1513%20 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0411%20 Jul
anubis4–13-0.0510%20 Jul
dust27–20.0610%20 Jul
mirage13–100.0225%19 Jul
dust213–110.0120%19 Jul
dust213–100.0618%19 Jul
anubis13–90.0215%19 Jul
ancient8–130.0416%19 Jul
cache13–80.0711%19 Jul
ancient13–30.0921%19 Jul
inferno7–130.0217%19 Jul
mirage9–130.0118%19 Jul
ancient11–130.0725%18 Jul
anubis10–13-0.0112%18 Jul
ancient13–40.0812%18 Jul
inferno15–150.0410%17 Jul
anubis4–130.058%17 Jul
inferno13–90.0722%17 Jul
inferno4–13-0.029%12 Jul
mirage5–13-0.0015%12 Jul
cache10–13-0.0212%12 Jul
ancient13–90.0921%12 Jul
inferno6–130.0022%11 Jul
ancient6–130.1018%11 Jul
nuke9–130.0715%11 Jul
anubis13–20.1024%11 Jul
anubis13–9-0.0118%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →