PR0fess0r — CS2 Stats

76561198252789536[U:1:292523808]Steam profile ↗

3,196Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler

FaceitLevel 7 · 1,308 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanMaster Guardian I

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim68

Positioning51

Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLWLLLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -40pp win rate · -0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.8

Aggression6.4

Utility6.0

Positioning5.1

Opening Duels2.1

Clutch3.2

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 604ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.8

Positioning5.1

Utility6.0

Mechanics6.0

Opening Duels2.1

Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time599ms−10ms

first ⅓ avg 609ms → last ⅓ avg 599ms

Headshot accuracy24.1%+7.0%

first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.28Best rating — nuke 9–1

13–0Biggest win — cache

5Longest win streak

7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

7Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 89% over 9ancientWeakest map · 32% over 25

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
ancient	D	25	8–17	32%	0.00
anubis	B	19	10–9	53%	0.01
dust2	A	16	9–7	56%	0.01
nuke	A	9	5–4	56%	0.03
mirage	S	9	8–1	89%	0.05
inferno	C	7	3–4	43%	0.00
agency	S	5	4–1	80%	0.00
cache	—	4	2–2	50%	-0.00
vertigo	—	2	1–1	50%	0.03
overpass	—	2	1–1	50%	0.01
warden	—	1	1–0	100%	-0.00
office	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 25). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,070Matches

50%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

79.6ADR

46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win

21%1v2 clutch win

9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	366	44%	1.04	14.8
Ancient	349	51%	1.14	16.8
Dust2	346	52%	1.09	15.5
Anubis	338	53%	1.07	16.5
Nuke	170	54%	1.06	15.7
Inferno	138	42%	1.04	14.9
Vertigo	89	53%	0.96	14.2
Overpass	28	57%	1.27	16.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.5%Headshot accuracy

35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

35.6%Spray accuracy

77.1%Counter-strafing

11.9°Preaim

604msReaction time

29.2%T opening success

47.2%CT opening success

0.45Enemies flashed / flash

5.3%Flash assists

8.08HE damage / grenade

21.67Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.448 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.2448% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 25 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	5–13	-0.06	21%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–8	0.04	26%	10 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.04	27%	8 Aug →
vertigo	11–13	0.04	23%	5 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.07	31%	19 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	18%	29 Jun →
dust2	11–13	-0.07	20%	10 Jun →
cache	13–0	-0.00	23%	20 May →
dust2	13–7	0.08	31%	20 May →
cache	7–13	-0.02	37%	18 May →
mirage	11–7	0.02	28%	18 May →
anubis	12–12	0.06	21%	18 May →
ancient	13–0	0.15	32%	18 May →
warden	13–6	-0.00	23%	18 May →
overpass	13–6	-0.04	24%	18 May →
inferno	10–13	0.07	26%	18 May →
nuke	13–5	0.02	36%	18 May →
cache	13–6	0.08	23%	18 May →
dust2	13–10	0.03	26%	18 May →
nuke	12–16	-0.02	29%	12 May →
ancient	10–13	-0.08	10%	12 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.00	28%	11 May →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	24%	15 Mar →
ancient	13–6	0.01	14%	15 Mar →
ancient	11–13	0.00	23%	15 Mar →
inferno	13–8	0.03	30%	11 Mar →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	28%	11 Mar →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	15%	9 Mar →
ancient	16–13	0.02	21%	8 Mar →
overpass	13–16	0.06	22%	7 Mar →
ancient	6–13	-0.06	24%	7 Mar →
anubis	12–16	0.00	14%	5 Mar →
mirage	13–11	-0.01	16%	28 Feb →
anubis	13–9	0.05	17%	21 Feb →
mirage	13–7	-0.05	28%	20 Feb →
vertigo	13–5	0.02	20%	10 Feb →
anubis	13–9	0.04	16%	10 Feb →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	17%	10 Feb →
mirage	13–2	0.11	16%	9 Feb →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	15%	25 Jan →
dust2	7–13	-0.07	20%	15 Jan →
ancient	13–9	0.04	29%	31 Dec →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	21%	17 Dec →
nuke	13–6	-0.01	26%	17 Dec →
ancient	13–10	-0.00	14%	11 Dec →
ancient	10–13	-0.03	10%	11 Dec →
mirage	13–10	0.05	13%	7 Dec →
mirage	12–16	0.06	18%	30 Nov →
inferno	2–13	-0.06	6%	30 Nov →
ancient	10–13	0.04	18%	29 Nov →
nuke	13–4	0.07	29%	29 Nov →
nuke	3–7	-0.10	0%	19 Oct →
mirage	13–6	0.13	33%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–7	0.12	21%	13 Sept →
ancient	13–16	0.00	11%	7 Sept →
dust2	13–4	0.10	27%	25 Aug →
dust2	6–13	-0.04	27%	11 Aug →
nuke	9–1	0.28	18%	10 Aug →
nuke	7–13	-0.02	9%	9 Aug →
ancient	3–13	-0.02	8%	29 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	8%	15 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.04	15%	15 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	23%	15 Jul →
mirage	13–9	0.12	14%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.05	10%	15 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.04	11%	10 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	15%	10 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.03	9%	9 Jul →
ancient	7–13	-0.03	15%	7 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	22%	6 Jul →
anubis	13–11	0.02	13%	6 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.05	14%	5 Jul →
office	7–7	-0.03	13%	4 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.03	22%	4 Jul →
ancient	11–13	-0.06	13%	2 Jul →
anubis	12–16	-0.04	18%	2 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	25%	2 Jul →
ancient	6–13	-0.03	31%	1 Jul →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	8%	1 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.06	16%	1 Jul →
dust2	9–13	-0.03	19%	1 Jul →
anubis	13–5	0.03	28%	1 Jul →
dust2	13–4	0.02	15%	1 Jul →
anubis	9–13	-0.05	26%	29 Jun →
ancient	13–11	-0.02	14%	28 Jun →
agency	13–11	-0.06	17%	15 Jun →
agency	8–6	-0.01	16%	15 Jun →
ancient	12–12	0.04	18%	15 Jun →
ancient	13–2	0.10	13%	15 Jun →
ancient	5–13	-0.04	22%	9 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.03	10%	9 Jun →
ancient	13–5	0.10	19%	9 Jun →
agency	3–13	-0.00	14%	9 Jun →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	11%	8 Jun →
anubis	13–10	0.05	11%	8 Jun →
dust2	13–9	0.05	14%	8 Jun →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	19%	7 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.02	19%	5 Jun →
agency	13–8	0.03	25%	1 Jun →
agency	13–2	0.05	15%	1 Jun →