AMEN — CS2 Stats

76561198244471222[U:1:284205494]

1,291Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating7.2 StrongAggressive Rifler

Premier CS Rating26,726Top 25% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.2% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#1073 of 16821 tracked

FaceitLevel 10Top 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning52

Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48–45–7Last 10048%Win rateLWLLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive Rifler — Takes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim8.1

Aggression7.2

Utility6.7

Positioning5.2

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch1.8

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.75 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.7° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 621ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning5.2

Utility6.7

Mechanics8.1

Opening Duels3.2

Win Impact8.6

Composite 7.2/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time628ms+4ms

first ⅓ avg 625ms → last ⅓ avg 628ms

Headshot accuracy20.7%+2.8%

first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 20.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 9–2

13–0Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

6–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

8Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 62% over 13anubisWeakest map · 30% over 10

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	B	25	12–13	48%	0.04
mirage	B	24	11–13	46%	0.00
dust2	A	13	8–5	62%	0.01
inferno	B	12	6–6	50%	0.04
anubis	D	10	3–7	30%	-0.00
ancient	A	7	4–3	57%	0.02
nuke	C	5	2–3	40%	0.05
overpass	—	3	2–1	67%	0.00
train	—	1	0–1	0%	0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,727Matches

55%Win rate

1.27Avg K/D

77.5ADR

51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win

33%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	34	50%	1.03	15.1
Ancient	19	68%	1.05	16.4
Dust2	12	42%	0.69	12.3
Nuke	11	45%	1.08	15.4
Inferno	8	50%	1.02	17.6
Overpass	8	62%	1.15	17.6
Anubis	7	57%	0.94	16.0
Cache	4	25%	0.65	10.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

39.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.4%Spray accuracy

86.4%Counter-strafing

10.7°Preaim

621msReaction time

33.1%T opening success

52.4%CT opening success

0.75Enemies flashed / flash

11.1%Flash assists

9.49HE damage / grenade

8.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 33.0661% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	3–13	-0.02	23%	4 Jul →
overpass	13–10	-0.05	31%	4 Jul →
train	9–13	0.01	17%	22 Jun →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	24%	19 Jun →
ancient	2–13	-0.03	31%	15 Jun →
mirage	13–5	0.01	15%	15 Jun →
inferno	6–13	0.13	21%	14 Jun →
inferno	10–13	0.06	22%	13 Jun →
inferno	13–11	0.03	21%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–8	0.04	19%	12 Jun →
mirage	13–11	0.07	24%	6 Jun →
cache	6–13	-0.07	22%	4 Jun →
cache	13–8	0.09	27%	2 Jun →
ancient	13–6	-0.02	22%	31 May →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	13%	28 May →
anubis	12–12	0.01	18%	27 May →
anubis	13–6	-0.03	21%	27 May →
anubis	8–13	-0.05	10%	27 May →
cache	12–12	0.10	37%	27 May →
inferno	9–2	0.17	30%	26 May →
cache	13–7	0.08	16%	26 May →
mirage	14–16	-0.03	14%	21 May →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	25%	20 May →
dust2	13–2	0.02	11%	20 May →
inferno	13–7	0.05	20%	20 May →
dust2	13–5	-0.06	19%	20 May →
nuke	9–13	0.07	18%	20 May →
dust2	13–3	0.05	20%	20 May →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	18%	20 May →
mirage	13–6	0.09	21%	20 May →
mirage	8–13	-0.03	13%	20 May →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	17%	20 May →
mirage	16–13	0.02	21%	19 May →
dust2	13–6	0.05	14%	19 May →
ancient	15–15	0.07	17%	13 May →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	29%	13 May →
dust2	10–13	0.04	15%	13 May →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	8%	13 May →
overpass	8–13	0.04	10%	13 May →
cache	9–13	0.04	17%	13 May →
inferno	10–13	0.09	12%	12 May →
cache	12–12	0.11	18%	12 May →
cache	13–5	0.02	24%	12 May →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	39%	12 May →
ancient	13–11	0.03	17%	12 May →
nuke	13–0	0.11	20%	12 May →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	13%	11 May →
inferno	13–4	-0.04	25%	11 May →
ancient	13–11	0.06	18%	11 May →
mirage	9–13	0.05	28%	11 May →
anubis	12–16	0.10	23%	11 May →
anubis	13–7	-0.00	15%	11 May →
cache	9–13	0.01	10%	11 May →
cache	5–13	0.04	21%	11 May →
cache	12–12	-0.01	15%	10 May →
cache	13–8	0.07	21%	10 May →
cache	13–4	0.04	29%	10 May →
cache	13–2	0.01	24%	10 May →
cache	13–4	0.05	16%	10 May →
cache	0–4	-0.01	80%	10 May →
cache	10–13	0.00	17%	10 May →
nuke	9–13	0.04	21%	9 May →
dust2	14–16	0.03	14%	9 May →
mirage	5–13	0.01	33%	9 May →
dust2	13–7	0.07	14%	9 May →
inferno	5–13	-0.02	32%	9 May →
anubis	9–13	-0.03	8%	9 May →
mirage	5–13	-0.07	15%	8 May →
mirage	13–6	0.05	24%	8 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.01	17%	8 May →
mirage	13–7	0.02	22%	6 May →
nuke	7–13	-0.04	15%	6 May →
inferno	13–8	0.04	16%	6 May →
mirage	12–16	-0.01	21%	6 May →
anubis	13–9	0.05	26%	6 May →
cache	13–6	0.14	19%	6 May →
mirage	7–13	-0.09	14%	4 May →
anubis	5–13	0.00	14%	4 May →
dust2	10–13	0.05	24%	4 May →
ancient	12–12	0.04	24%	4 May →
cache	13–5	0.14	13%	4 May →
inferno	9–13	-0.05	12%	3 May →
mirage	2–13	-0.07	14%	3 May →
overpass	13–9	0.02	18%	3 May →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	16%	3 May →
mirage	9–13	0.08	20%	2 May →
cache	5–13	-0.10	8%	2 May →
cache	12–12	0.07	22%	2 May →
cache	13–6	0.10	30%	2 May →
inferno	13–10	-0.03	19%	2 May →
inferno	12–16	0.04	15%	1 May →
nuke	13–2	0.05	31%	1 May →
cache	9–13	-0.04	11%	1 May →
mirage	16–13	0.03	19%	30 Apr →
mirage	7–13	-0.05	22%	29 Apr →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	26%	29 Apr →
mirage	5–1	-0.03	0%	29 Apr →
ancient	13–7	-0.02	9%	29 Apr →
cache	13–3	0.16	13%	29 Apr →
cache	13–8	-0.02	22%	29 Apr →