Gniht — CS2 Stats

76561198240767354[U:1:280501626]

2,488Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingHybrid Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,641Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#13561 of 45690 tracked
FaceitLevel 9Top 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGnihtFACEITLevel 9STANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER21,641 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim60
Positioning52
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55432Last 10055%Win rateWLLWLLWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.0
Aggression6.3
Utility5.8
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch3.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 602ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.8
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact5.0

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time597ms+30ms
first ⅓ avg 567ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.17Best rating — inferno 13–3
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
105In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 72% over 18dust2Weakest map · 33% over 6
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB23121152%-0.01
ancientS1813572%0.01
infernoA1810856%0.00
cacheC167944%0.01
anubisB126650%-0.02
dust2D62433%-0.04
nukeA53260%-0.04
overpass220100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

290Matches
53%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
82.1ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient6052%0.9715.9
Mirage5758%1.0114.2
Inferno5050%0.9713.5
Anubis4856%0.9515.3
Nuke1242%0.7615.3
Vertigo1050%0.8116.6
Cache967%1.3116.0
Overpass757%1.1617.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
35.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
66.8%Counter-strafing
10.2°Preaim
602msReaction time
37.6%T opening success
39.6%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
10.49HE damage / grenade
6.78Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.6319% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient13–80.0113%6 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0415%5 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0414%5 Jul
ancient13–40.1314%15 Jun
inferno4–13-0.0829%10 Jun
inferno5–13-0.0823%10 Jun
ancient13–9-0.0413%8 Jun
ancient10–13-0.0114%8 Jun
inferno13–30.1728%7 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0214%7 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0311%7 Jun
anubis5–130.0117%5 Jun
ancient13–110.0619%4 Jun
ancient13–10-0.0613%4 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0916%4 Jun
cache4–13-0.0423%4 Jun
mirage13–10-0.058%4 Jun
anubis9–13-0.0614%3 Jun
mirage16–12-0.0114%3 Jun
mirage13–8-0.0216%3 Jun
ancient13–100.0212%3 Jun
overpass13–110.0216%2 Jun
inferno13–90.0019%2 Jun
anubis8–13-0.0123%1 Jun
ancient9–130.0714%1 Jun
ancient7–13-0.0316%1 Jun
nuke6–13-0.0621%1 Jun
mirage9–13-0.0019%31 May
mirage4–100.0130%31 May
ancient13–11-0.0413%30 May
anubis16–140.0116%29 May
anubis13–11-0.0113%29 May
mirage16–120.0115%29 May
mirage11–130.0122%28 May
ancient13–90.0613%28 May
mirage16–14-0.0514%28 May
inferno16–140.0213%27 May
ancient13–7-0.0213%27 May
anubis13–50.0311%26 May
mirage13–60.0621%26 May
inferno7–13-0.0017%24 May
inferno9–130.0220%24 May
mirage10–13-0.0611%23 May
ancient13–90.0217%23 May
mirage8–13-0.0316%23 May
ancient19–160.019%23 May
ancient5–13-0.046%22 May
mirage8–130.049%21 May
anubis13–7-0.0112%20 May
ancient14–16-0.0110%19 May
inferno13–50.049%19 May
inferno13–50.0713%18 May
mirage13–30.0622%18 May
inferno10–13-0.0217%18 May
anubis13–7-0.0418%18 May
cache13–80.0924%17 May
mirage14–16-0.0412%16 May
ancient16–140.0122%16 May
mirage13–90.0112%16 May
dust29–13-0.0512%15 May
dust213–9-0.0011%15 May
inferno16–13-0.0119%15 May
inferno9–13-0.038%15 May
mirage11–13-0.0418%10 May
ancient13–70.0419%10 May
mirage10–130.0115%9 May
nuke13–4-0.074%9 May
dust216–13-0.0119%9 May
cache3–130.0319%9 May
nuke13–70.0219%8 May
cache13–8-0.0216%8 May
anubis5–13-0.0432%7 May
cache13–60.0713%7 May
cache13–90.0217%4 May
cache13–80.017%4 May
cache12–12-0.028%3 May
cache8–13-0.0218%3 May
dust26–13-0.119%2 May
cache9–130.0010%1 May
cache5–130.0120%30 Apr
cache12–12-0.0321%30 Apr
cache3–13-0.0325%30 Apr
cache13–50.0510%28 Apr
cache10–13-0.036%28 Apr
cache13–7-0.0123%28 Apr
inferno13–10-0.0417%26 Apr
overpass13–50.0011%26 Apr
anubis13–11-0.0117%24 Apr
nuke16–140.0018%23 Apr
dust22–13-0.0411%22 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0023%22 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0110%20 Apr
mirage13–9-0.017%20 Apr
inferno10–13-0.0314%20 Apr
nuke4–13-0.0820%19 Apr
inferno13–90.0516%19 Apr
mirage13–10.0616%19 Apr
inferno8–13-0.0518%19 Apr
dust210–13-0.0123%12 Apr
inferno13–100.0317%12 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →