Zaru — CS2 Stats

US76561198224890936[U:1:264625208]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,912Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating4.5 Developing

Premier CS Rating16,494Purple band · top ~22.5% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#15452 of 26630 tracked

FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim35

Positioning59

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateLWWLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.06 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim3.5

Aggression8.7

Utility4.9

Positioning5.9

Opening Duels3.3

Clutch3.6

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like b1t 82% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 624ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.5

Positioning5.9

Utility4.9

Mechanics4.2

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.5/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01

first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00

Reaction time617ms+14ms

first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 617ms

Headshot accuracy15.7%−1.5%

first ⅓ avg 17.2% → last ⅓ avg 15.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.18Best rating — ancient 13–6

13–2Biggest win — mirage

6Longest win streak

8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 64% over 11dust2Weakest map · 14% over 7

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
cache	C	21	9–12	43%	-0.01
mirage	C	20	8–12	40%	-0.01
nuke	A	20	12–8	60%	0.01
anubis	A	11	7–4	64%	-0.01
ancient	B	11	5–6	45%	0.01
inferno	C	8	3–5	38%	0.01
dust2	D	7	1–6	14%	-0.03
office	—	1	0–1	0%	0.05
fachwerk	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

39Matches

46%Win rate

0.89Avg K/D

83.5ADR

33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

7%1v2 clutch win

6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	9	44%	0.77	16.0
Anubis	6	50%	1.13	15.3
Dust2	5	0%	1.07	19.2
Inferno	3	33%	1.02	17.0
Nuke	3	67%	0.93	15.7
Ancient	2	50%	0.58	9.5
Train	1	100%	1.38	22.0
Overpass	1	100%	0.47	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy

29.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

29.2%Spray accuracy

68.9%Counter-strafing

11.4°Preaim

624msReaction time

36.1%T opening success

49.9%CT opening success

0.48Enemies flashed / flash

2.9%Flash assists

10.40HE damage / grenade

10.34Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.
Enemies flashed per flash 0.4806 — below the 0.5 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.1043% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	9–13	-0.07	15%	19 Aug →
ancient	13–10	-0.03	9%	19 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.04	7%	19 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	16%	18 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.06	25%	18 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.03	16%	7 Aug →
cache	3–13	-0.04	14%	7 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.04	21%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.04	11%	30 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	41%	30 Jul →
mirage	13–2	0.02	24%	30 Jul →
ancient	13–6	0.18	26%	30 Jul →
cache	7–13	-0.00	9%	29 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.01	8%	29 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.05	23%	29 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.00	14%	28 Jul →
mirage	13–4	0.03	18%	28 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.00	11%	28 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	11%	28 Jul →
mirage	7–13	0.04	26%	28 Jul →
ancient	2–13	-0.05	9%	26 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.03	12%	26 Jul →
nuke	16–14	0.03	24%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–9	-0.03	8%	26 Jul →
cache	13–3	0.00	25%	26 Jul →
nuke	13–8	-0.00	18%	26 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	8%	26 Jul →
nuke	12–16	0.02	6%	26 Jul →
ancient	13–9	0.08	15%	26 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	3%	24 Jul →
mirage	13–11	-0.04	13%	24 Jul →
ancient	11–13	0.02	13%	24 Jul →
anubis	6–13	-0.00	18%	24 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.06	9%	24 Jul →
nuke	4–13	-0.02	13%	24 Jul →
mirage	1–13	-0.00	8%	23 Jul →
mirage	13–4	-0.01	15%	23 Jul →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	11%	23 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.02	27%	23 Jul →
ancient	13–10	-0.07	10%	23 Jul →
dust2	13–7	-0.03	24%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–3	0.08	18%	23 Jul →
nuke	13–5	0.06	18%	23 Jul →
nuke	14–16	0.01	22%	22 Jul →
cache	9–13	-0.05	19%	22 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	18%	22 Jul →
ancient	5–13	-0.02	23%	22 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.01	11%	22 Jul →
mirage	5–13	-0.03	10%	22 Jul →
inferno	6–13	-0.00	20%	22 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.07	5%	22 Jul →
mirage	10–13	-0.03	10%	21 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	21%	21 Jul →
inferno	8–13	0.02	37%	21 Jul →
anubis	13–10	0.01	16%	21 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.06	16%	20 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.08	10%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	12%	20 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.03	16%	20 Jul →
office	9–13	0.05	20%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–11	-0.00	12%	19 Jul →
dust2	11–13	0.02	31%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.05	13%	19 Jul →
cache	3–13	-0.05	11%	16 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.00	6%	16 Jul →
cache	9–13	0.04	11%	15 Jul →
mirage	11–13	0.04	13%	15 Jul →
nuke	15–15	0.03	17%	15 Jul →
fachwerk	12–12	-0.02	8%	15 Jul →
dust2	4–13	-0.02	24%	14 Jul →
dust2	5–13	-0.04	17%	14 Jul →
nuke	7–13	-0.01	18%	14 Jul →
nuke	13–7	0.00	23%	14 Jul →
ancient	4–13	-0.04	8%	13 Jul →
mirage	9–13	-0.03	7%	13 Jul →
cache	13–11	-0.02	15%	13 Jul →
cache	13–2	0.06	22%	13 Jul →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	9%	13 Jul →
mirage	14–16	0.01	20%	13 Jul →
cache	8–13	0.05	17%	13 Jul →
inferno	7–13	-0.01	16%	12 Jul →
nuke	13–6	0.02	17%	12 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.07	16%	12 Jul →
anubis	13–9	0.03	21%	12 Jul →
mirage	16–13	0.01	17%	12 Jul →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	20%	12 Jul →
nuke	10–13	-0.01	19%	12 Jul →
anubis	7–13	-0.04	30%	12 Jul →
mirage	13–10	-0.04	14%	11 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.04	4%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.01	7%	11 Jul →
ancient	13–16	0.00	24%	11 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.04	20%	11 Jul →
mirage	8–13	-0.04	14%	10 Jul →
cache	13–8	0.04	15%	10 Jul →
cache	13–8	-0.03	24%	10 Jul →
anubis	11–13	-0.02	22%	10 Jul →
mirage	15–15	-0.02	18%	10 Jul →
cache	7–13	0.01	33%	10 Jul →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	13%	9 Jul →