Chuck Lidill — CS2 Stats

76561198222491292[U:1:262225564]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,243Tracked matches61%Win rate2020Tracked since

CSDB Rating5.7 Solid

Premier CS Rating21,942Top 50% of 819 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.4% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#6352 of 19811 tracked

WingmanGold Nova III

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim58

Positioning48

Utility51

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–41–4Last 10055%Win rateWWLWLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: -20pp win rate · -0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.8

Aggression5.8

Utility5.1

Positioning4.8

Opening Duels3.2

Clutch0.0

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like Twistzz 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.8

Positioning4.8

Utility5.1

Mechanics6.2

Opening Duels3.3

Win Impact8.6

Composite 5.7/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.02

first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02

Reaction time585ms−99ms

first ⅓ avg 684ms → last ⅓ avg 585ms

Headshot accuracy15.6%−5.5%

first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.14Best rating — mirage 13–3

13–1Biggest win — ancient

5Longest win streak

W2Current streak

10–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 89% over 9dust2Weakest map · 46% over 24

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
mirage	B	30	15–15	50%	-0.00
dust2	B	24	11–13	46%	-0.01
ancient	B	15	8–7	53%	-0.03
nuke	A	13	8–5	62%	0.00
anubis	S	9	8–1	89%	-0.02
cache	S	7	5–2	71%	-0.01
inferno	—	2	0–2	0%	-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 24). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

43Matches

51%Win rate

1.21Avg K/D

92.8ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

20%1v1 clutch win

14%1v2 clutch win

4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	12	42%	1.20	15.8
Dust2	6	67%	1.43	19.0
Nuke	3	100%	2.72	18.7
Ancient	2	50%	0.90	17.5
Cache	2	100%	0.94	16.5
Anubis	2	50%	1.10	19.5
Train	1	0%	1.06	18.0
Inferno	1	0%	0.94	17.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy

30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

34.0%Spray accuracy

78.1%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

585msReaction time

29.5%T opening success

56.5%CT opening success

0.69Enemies flashed / flash

7.8%Flash assists

8.38HE damage / grenade

9.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 29.457% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 24 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
anubis	16–13	-0.08	13%	28 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.04	10%	28 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.04	11%	28 Aug →
dust2	16–14	-0.02	16%	28 Aug →
mirage	11–13	-0.03	15%	28 Aug →
cache	8–13	-0.01	11%	28 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.01	22%	27 Aug →
dust2	4–13	-0.07	23%	27 Aug →
nuke	16–13	0.06	14%	27 Aug →
anubis	13–4	-0.10	8%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–8	-0.05	16%	26 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.06	13%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–7	-0.01	17%	25 Aug →
cache	13–11	0.07	16%	24 Aug →
mirage	13–7	0.01	15%	23 Aug →
anubis	13–3	-0.01	15%	23 Aug →
nuke	11–13	-0.04	23%	23 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	18%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–11	-0.06	15%	23 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.06	9%	23 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.08	24%	23 Aug →
mirage	10–1	0.02	14%	23 Aug →
nuke	3–13	-0.04	17%	23 Aug →
anubis	15–15	0.00	11%	23 Aug →
ancient	7–13	-0.01	18%	23 Aug →
mirage	15–15	0.02	11%	23 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.03	12%	23 Aug →
dust2	13–6	0.05	17%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–1	0.01	28%	23 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	21%	21 Aug →
dust2	8–13	0.01	20%	21 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.02	10%	21 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.05	14%	20 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.02	18%	20 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.02	25%	20 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.06	16%	18 Aug →
nuke	13–7	-0.00	26%	18 Aug →
cache	13–10	-0.04	23%	18 Aug →
dust2	9–13	-0.08	20%	18 Aug →
mirage	13–2	0.03	14%	18 Aug →
cache	13–8	-0.06	13%	17 Aug →
anubis	13–3	0.04	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	17%	17 Aug →
mirage	9–13	-0.01	16%	17 Aug →
nuke	15–15	-0.05	10%	17 Aug →
mirage	13–11	0.01	15%	17 Aug →
nuke	13–9	0.02	22%	17 Aug →
mirage	11–13	0.04	15%	16 Aug →
dust2	9–13	0.01	19%	16 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.02	19%	16 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	24%	16 Aug →
ancient	13–5	-0.04	21%	16 Aug →
dust2	7–13	-0.03	17%	16 Aug →
dust2	6–13	0.05	20%	16 Aug →
dust2	11–13	0.02	19%	16 Aug →
cache	5–13	-0.03	16%	15 Aug →
ancient	13–11	-0.04	13%	15 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.01	16%	14 Aug →
ancient	16–13	-0.04	8%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	22%	14 Aug →
dust2	13–6	-0.02	17%	13 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.02	14%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.04	25%	13 Aug →
mirage	13–10	-0.01	27%	13 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.02	16%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–9	-0.05	9%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–8	0.02	19%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–16	-0.06	24%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–16	0.01	14%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–6	-0.05	21%	12 Aug →
mirage	13–3	0.14	14%	12 Aug →
ancient	13–7	-0.04	8%	12 Aug →
nuke	13–11	-0.00	22%	12 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.00	16%	12 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.05	27%	9 Aug →
mirage	15–15	-0.04	22%	8 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.02	15%	8 Aug →
ancient	0–13	-0.05	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–1	0.09	28%	8 Aug →
inferno	10–13	-0.01	26%	8 Aug →
mirage	13–6	0.05	34%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.09	19%	8 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	21%	8 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.00	27%	8 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.01	22%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–10	-0.01	24%	7 Aug →
ancient	10–13	-0.04	27%	7 Aug →
mirage	13–8	-0.01	34%	7 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.07	24%	7 Aug →
mirage	5–13	-0.10	15%	6 Aug →
dust2	13–4	-0.03	24%	6 Aug →
mirage	13–4	0.02	15%	6 Aug →
nuke	4–13	-0.07	29%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–6	-0.06	17%	6 Aug →
inferno	9–13	-0.09	21%	6 Aug →
cache	13–6	-0.03	19%	6 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.02	5%	6 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.00	19%	6 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.05	24%	6 Aug →
anubis	13–11	-0.01	22%	6 Aug →